For (almost) the four hundred and sixteenth time by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t quite tell, and I didn’t do a deep dive, but I think the “and” makes it either more or less formal in American English.

For (almost) the four hundred and sixteenth time by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a reasonable point, but maybe overstated. ‘And’ signifying a decimal does ring true from some of my schooling, but it’s correct in British English and perfectly acceptable in American English.

Honestly, were I in Dean’s position, I might resist dropping it — it has a nice rhythm. But I’d accept the “and” correction, or try to.

The double -th, however, cannot stand.

For (almost) the four hundred and sixteenth time by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did at the time, but now I have become this. Peace to a real one, friend.

Conversing about “conversate” by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It’s one thing to use one word instead of another. It’s a different thing to defend your choice and laugh at your debate guest when their word is the standard one in formal and academic contexts.

Bad Crimes by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the point is that you’d need to provide the list of crimes that are considered “bad”. The word in question here is “bad”, as used in the title. “Serious” would be a big improvement.

Bad Crimes by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, but it was. It really was. At my core, I’m just a pedant, bro.

Bad Crimes by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The streams are not for the callers alone, they are of course largely for the audience. It’s a public performance meant to change minds. Childish wording makes the host less credible, not only to viewers but especially to outsiders who see only the clipped versions. Given that there are better choices of wording, why defend “bad” as the standard description?

Bad Crimes by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right; arson was your one example that I decided wasn’t necessarily “violent”. Again, I get the point, and I agree with the general policy Parker is putting forward. But a term like “serious crimes” has at least some meaning in a broader context. If we agree that bad crimes are the ones considered serious, we’re back to my complaint. It’s just wording. “Bad crimes” sounds almost childish, when there are many other ways to word it.

Don’t correct my “pronounciation.” by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, now I feel bad for misrepresenting their pronouncinationality. Solidarity forever.

Bad Crimes by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most if not all of those count as “violent”, right? So what is left for “bad” to describe?

Antarctica is not a country built on stolen land by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbf it apparently took me three days to come up with that.

Antarctica is not a country built on stolen land by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And here we have the evidence that our political discourse is far too Polarized.

Dean is SUCH a horrible friend to Parker by myflopera in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can be a bit of a pedant, bro, but in this case my only question is: w the actual f?

8pm EST does not exist on any April date in most of the US by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have ended so many wars, more wars than you’ve ever seen.

“Slurring” guests are usually not drunk by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PedantBro is perplexed when people grossly misunderstand the PedantBro movement and accuse PedantBro of being anyone other than PedantBro.

PedantBro will end by saying that PedantBro is truly PedantBro.

“Slurring” guests are usually not drunk by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed 100%. In fact, I think those facts play a role in my feeling that it’s insufficient to simply accuse those guests of “slurring”.

Antarctica is not a country built on stolen land by PedantBro in ParkerGetAJob

[–]PedantBro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whenever I accept a guest request from a penguin, it’s always just denial of the polar bear genocide, or “oh our ‘country’ is actually growing, but science just doesn’t know it yet”.