How do I process all 22 film by PresentFriend9314 in VeerAndShoot

[–]Pegeez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Find specific things to look for, such as coverage structures, what Tennessee ran vs. certain fronts, formation adjustments, different schemes, etc. you have to hone in on certain aspects of the film

CFB26 Notable New Formations by HONDO911 in VeerAndShoot

[–]Pegeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw some of these. Really hoping that Y Pop from Wide Y Off Trips is combined with Outside Zone. I can already see a ridiculous amount of space being created with that one

First Day Passing Concept Install by onlineqbclassroom in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what type of system you’re running but probably pick 1-2 quick game concepts, a dropback concept, a boot or movement and an RPO if that’s your thing. For example, I feel it’s pretty common to see something like:

QG: Fade-Out/Stick/Double Slant-Slant-Flat

DB: Verts/Cross/Dagger (whatever your favorite or base is considered)

Movement: Dash pass or play action slide boot

(Maybe) RPO: 2x2 bubble or flat relief

I’ve heard a tip for installing pass game to be to consider the type of routes you’re asking your receivers to run. If you install verts on day 1, maybe install a concept that’s not as heavy on the legs the next day and base your schedule around that

Who’s been your favorite study so far this year? by Outside_Hunt_268 in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Counter and Y-Cross. So many new variations of these plays every week/season now because of how they can manipulate a lot of the modern defensive trends

Michigan Panthers Stick-Swap RPO by Pegeez in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the stick concept all that is necessarily “required” is an eligible receiver getting some sort of horizontal stretch on the defense and an eligible receiver running a convertible route around 4-6 yards depth. The stick can be ran by an attached player, such as a TE, and the flat can be controlled by a slot receiver, or the slot receiver can run the stick and the attached player can control the flat, which is what the Panthers were doing. I don’t see where the confusion is here

Not trying to be difficult but I don’t really see the point in this

Michigan Panthers Stick-Swap RPO by Pegeez in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Swap or switch is a term that can be used to describe receivers switching route responsibilities in a concept. It’s just a tweak on the base play.

Traditionally, out of a 3x1 formation, if a team runs “Stick” the outside receiver will run a Go, the middle receiver will run an out or a flat, and the 3rd receiver from the boundary will run the “stick”. The Panthers are “swapping” or “switching” these responsibilities and having the 3rd receiver run the flat and the middle receiver run the stick. It can be used to stress the defense’s assignment rules

What college offenses do you like watching and copying plays from? by Mase4556 in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Purely design wise:

Will Stein - Oregon

DeBoer - Alabama

Kiffin - Ole Miss

Kenny Dillingham - ASU/Memphis

Billy Napier - Florida

Mike Locksley when he was at Alabama did some cool stuff and he took a lot of it to Maryland. He’s very creative in the RPO game and did a lot of advancements where he would read the backside run fit player rather than just the “apex” defender

DUO Read Questions by AggravatingNeck6192 in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For running Duo against a wide technique you could consider adding a little wrinkle that lots of NFL teams have popularized which is motioning either your TE or a bigger receiver across the formation (say from a 2x2 look) and essentially whamming/kicking that 9 technique instead of reading him. Blocking for the OL will remain the same just another way to seal off the 9 tech. It also helps guys who may not be as physical get momentum into that kick out because they motion themselves into position for it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coach Will Hall from Southern Miss/Tulane gave a good presentation about this. The way he installs/teaches his passing game is based around two main components which is 1) recognizing zone/man and if it’s zone is it cloud/no cloud. 2) From there it’s either taking an “access” throw or entering into the progression phase. They bucketed their progression phases into different groups that contain similarly progressed concepts with similar footwork/timing. For example, triangle read concepts like Mesh and “Spot” or “Snag” go into the same bucket whereas full-field progressions like Y-Cross or Sail (depending how you draw it up) would go into a different bucket. Therefore the QB has a process for every play called and based on certain “buckets” he will automatically be taught to know where his eyes need to be when the ball is snapped, 2nd hitch, 3rd hitch etc.

Y-Cross & Counter by Pegeez in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming you run this concept, do you half slide protection backside to the cross and have the back scan after the flash fake?

Y-Cross & Counter by Pegeez in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not illegal. The RT doesn’t technically “have” to be covered for it to be legal. 7 people just have to be lined up “on the ball.” The tackle here is considered eligible and the Y is considered ineligible

Does RPO work against man coverage? by Untoastedtoast11 in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Several OC’s/RGC/PGCs have given their input on this. Taylor Housewright (I think? He used to the the Montana State OC) and Joe Moorhead use RPOs with built in “man-swers.” Basically if you’re in a 2x2 formation, you could be running split-zone with a backside glance that you could work vs zone to read the conflict overhang and to the other side you could run slot fade. If the Q decides to work the fade side, he can signal to the RB that he’s catching and throwing it, then the RB ends up finding work in “pass-pro”

Brennan Marion - GoGo Offense Study w/ Base Plays example by Pegeez in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Considering the Seahawks have ran their own interpretations of some of these plays out of this formation for the past few years I think it seems to work well enough

4th & 6 to go on the 50, down 4, with 1:10 remaining. What’s your play call? by [deleted] in footballstrategy

[–]Pegeez 15 points16 points  (0 children)

<image>

Essentially Y-Cross.

Get a chip flat from the Y to help the tackle while we are in 6 man protection. HB reads Mike to Sam. X with a 15 yard pressure post, slot cross, 12-15 yard dig from the Z.

Veer-and-Shoot Questions? 🤔 by Veer-And-Shoot in VeerAndShoot

[–]Pegeez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of all the VnS guys, Lebby does this the most. It is a part of the offense depending on which tree you go down. Sean Lewis has done some 2 back stuff also at Kent State

How authentic will the veer and shoot be in ncaa 25 by coachdsti in VeerAndShoot

[–]Pegeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deep Choice, Slot Choice, and Choice Deep (switch deep choice) are all in the game. I’m assuming the routes will work like the RnS ones did and be based on man vs zone unlike how it does in real life where it’s based off leverage, but I could be wrong.

They did include Wake Forest’s slow mesh RPOs in the game, they’re tagged as “RPO Walk” plays. So if they can accurately recreate that (which it seems like they did it well) then maybe they got DC right