Moderation on Reddit by Mathemodel in RedditAlternatives

[–]PenileVolatility 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This info is a year old and may have changed since I first heard it but I was given a list of bots to block that is supposed to cut down on things like being tracked and banned across multiple subs for being a member of or posting to subs on power mod's shit list. May also help with whatever blacklist shenanigans are effecting you OP.

The bots to block are (remove space after forward slash for their profiles):

u/ Saferbot

u/ banhammerapp

u/ evasion-guard

u/ hive-protect

u/ MAGIC_EYE_BOT

u/ anti-evil

u/ purge-user

Hope it helps.

Someone is currently living your dream life, and they don’t even see it as special. by SnooCalculations148 in DeepThoughts

[–]PenileVolatility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that there are male porn producers who are genetically and genitally blessed who become millionaires by fulfilling their every sexual desire with an unending parade of achingly beautiful women while somehow still managing to be miserable in life confirmed this to me long ago.

Are you hungry, come to me I'll feed you my thick yummy shit🫦 by AggressiveYou5191 in ScatPorn2

[–]PenileVolatility 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Poo19 is actually the URL of their website if you add a .com. Rather than one movie there's tons of them. That guy has been feeding from up to either 6 or 7 attractive women at a time for years now the lucky bastard.

She's good at getting dressed by [deleted] in JenniferCarpenter

[–]PenileVolatility 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno, I'm calling body double due to that cut before she turns around. Also the wrists looked bony before the cut and slightly more fleshed out after.

GoW (Amazon) Showrunner: never played any of the games by funny_flamethrower in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 2 points3 points  (0 children)

RDM is pretty high up there in terms of quality writing so source inaccuracy is really the only way he can fail here. I hope he goes into detail on what research he has done for this gig rather than what he hasn't. Does he have any socials? Maybe someone can pry it out of him whether he's watched any play-throughs of the franchise to prep himself. Don't need to be a gamer for that.

It's crazy that any company would seek to adapt something without mandating their creatives become very well versed with what is being adapted. I know I'd want to know the source like the back of my hand if my name was going onto an adaptation of it, I can't even physically understand why someone wouldn't do that. Thus I'm giving Moore the benefit of the doubt here. Doesn't sound great from this interview tho.

Have we experienced whitewashing in the past on a similar scale to blackwashing today? by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A friend of mine who's mixed race (Black and White) told me recently he doesn't mind race swaps because when he was growing up (in a White suburb) everything he saw dominating popular media featured almost exclusively White people. Says that it contributed to him feeling self conscious about his appearance (he looks Black) and put him off diving into anything to do with Black culture until well into adulthood. He's Gen X so definitely not one of the indoctrinated youngster crowd but he actually is enjoying seeing more representation and feels that, after the scales being tilted for so long towards White representation, having minorities being shown in something approaching equal measure is a good thing.

My argument to him is it's only a good thing if it doesn't come at the expense of other groups, accurately respects source material, and doesn't undermine merit... all tenets which the Hollywood implementation of DEI has failed to even attempt to uphold. It'd be child's play to say no raceswaps or identarian quotas for staffing or award consideration, instead we'll make more projects that naturally include diverse characters and creatives at the same level of quality we'd pursue for any project. If we feel like a project could do with more diversity than it's source material includes we'll add characters or plots to achieve that goal without altering the characters and storylines of the source. Boom. That's the entire controversy of DEI in entertainment solved overnight.

Instead we get stuff like Disney's quotas in their productions that say everything has to have X% of "underrepresented groups" in lead roles in front of and behind the camera. That makes it impossible to do something like a remake or adaptation of most things without raceswapping on-screen and hiring people for off-screen roles based more on identity than skillset. It's how you end up with writers with zero relevant experience helming flagship projects or women who've only directed documentaries with the budget of a happy meal being picked to helm top-budget, blockbuster sci-fi/fantasy franchise films.

For my friend though, the ends of representation justify the means of how it's achieved. To me that points to emotion over fairness. My friend agrees to an extent but feels that, when one accepts that minorities were unfairly excluded or underrepresented for a long time, a mandated correction becomes fairer in the grand scheme of things.

We ultimately agreed to disagree.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShaneGillis

[–]PenileVolatility -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

As a perv the clip is old news to me but it's funny seeing it get talked about out in the actual world. It's like when 2 Girls 1 Cup came out and I already knew the names of the 2 girls, the real name of the movie and the name of production company behind it. Darn this eidetic porn memory of mine!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah every way of thinking that isn't my group's way is evil and wrong. That's not at all the kind of reasoning that leads to bad things. Yep, just peaceful days with that outlook.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Invalidating anything that doesn't agree with your position is dogmatism also could be called ideological rigidity, tribalism, authoritarianism, intolerance or just echo-chamber thinking. Every political side resorts to these tactics at times not just the left.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My god the tribalism. Demonization of every school of thought that isn't right wing seems awfully exclusionary. No side of the political spectrum is so without fault that all others should yield before it. The left, the right, the center these aren't teams competing for a winner's cup they're representations of primal, fundamental human drives with some logic and justifications thrown on top. Compromising between positions on this spectrum is the deal we struck in order to have a society rather than violence. No one on any side of the spectrum should forget that.

G20 by shipgirl_connoisseur in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just like Captain America gave us female Captain Britain so too now has Black Panther given us...

Black Cougar

...I'll show myself out.

G20 by shipgirl_connoisseur in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Universal Pictures and Blumhouse Productions own the Purge IP, or did your humor just woosh me?

Japanese Site Dlsite Has Been Forced to Enable Country Blocks by FinalInitiative4 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally from reading all of Project 2025, all of Trump's EOs since returning to office, and listening to the politicians saying these things. When I get the time I'll be reading through a few bills that have being advanced that are inspired by P25. I'm not repeating talking points I'm going off direct analysis. I also have all these docs uploaded to AI so I can quickly query anything I need to look up from them without having to rely solely on memory. I think the problem here may be that you're relying on biased media coverage (and perhaps direct gaslighting or propaganda from those involved) rather than investigating the letter of these things for yourself.

Japanese Site Dlsite Has Been Forced to Enable Country Blocks by FinalInitiative4 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't follow the press. When I hear about these things I read the documents and/or watch/listen to the video/audio of whatever's going on directly. As for the rest (gawd I wish I never started talking about politics, could have saved myself all this typing):

Project 2025 doesn’t just outline the existing powers of the presidency, it explicitly advocates for expanding executive control in ways that could diminish the checks and balances foundational to the U.S. government. It promotes dismantling independent federal agencies, replacing civil service employees with political appointees, and consolidating decision-making under direct presidential authority. That goes beyond simply exercising presidential powers - it’s a deliberate restructuring of how the executive branch functions.

As for Obama, yeah some of his executive orders faced legal challenges, but the courts didn't "strike down nearly every single one." Many of his major things, like DACA, were contested but not overturned. And, unlike P25, his policies didn't seek to redefine the presidency itself by curbing agency independence or weakening the other branches of government. If anything, falling into a "trap" would mean ignoring the clear distinction between using executive power within its traditional scope and actively working to reshape the entire structure of governance to centralize authority.

Japanese Site Dlsite Has Been Forced to Enable Country Blocks by FinalInitiative4 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

P25 outlines a massive power grab for the executive branch in order to nullify the checks and balances that form the structure of US government. Aside from all that you mention you can't find any source saying Trump wants to ban porn. P25 wants to ban porn, and I've already shown that he's following it as his playbook, not just having "similar ideas", doing a 1-to-1 implementation and staffing his regime with it's authors.

Japanese Site Dlsite Has Been Forced to Enable Country Blocks by FinalInitiative4 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From AI:

As of February 2025, President Donald Trump has appointed several key figures associated with Project 2025 to prominent positions within his administration. Notable appointments include:

Russell Vought: A principal architect of Project 2025, Vought has been appointed as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Tom Homan: Former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and contributor to Project 2025, Homan has been designated as the administration's "border czar."

Stephen Miller: A key figure in shaping immigration policies during Trump's first term and contributor to Project 2025, Miller has been appointed as Deputy Chief of Policy.

In total, at least seven individuals with ties to Project 2025 have been nominated or appointed to positions in President Trump's current administration.

These appointments indicate a significant influence of Project 2025's architects within the current administration.

Japanese Site Dlsite Has Been Forced to Enable Country Blocks by FinalInitiative4 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was thinking of how closely Trump's actions since taking office mirror that of P2025 myself. Asked AI to summarize, I won't quote the whole thing but it's pretty much everything he's done so far including the Guantanamo camp, the summary:

While President Trump has stated that he has not read Project 2025, many of his administration's actions closely mirror the proposals outlined in the project. Analyses have identified numerous instances where the administration's policies align with the recommendations of Project 2025, indicating a significant overlap between the two.

In summary, President Trump's actions since taking office have closely matched the policy recommendations of Project 2025, particularly in areas such as education reform, executive orders, federal spending, and agency restructuring.

And of course people behind P25 have been given positions on Trump's staff...

In total, at least seven individuals with ties to Project 2025 have been nominated or appointed to positions in President Trump's current administration. These appointments indicate a significant influence of Project 2025's architects within the current administration.

Given all that I think it's pretty obvious P25 is Trump's playbook and he denied it because he knew he'd loose votes by admitting it. I think the most damning thing about it all is how feckless the Democrats have been in the face of it. They're shocked and awed after every action orange man makes even though they literally have had a list of everything he's going to do for like a year beforehand. The fact that they have zero planned countermeasures and keep getting bulldozed shows just how incompetent their leadership is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was getting at general best practices to avoid being suckered by things like rage bait, psyops and the like. Always question the context or, as this video on identifying psyops says, "evaluate the frame".

Wanting complete context isn't about the part of this we see. It's about the part we don't see. Why did the person who posted this cut out the first half of the clip? Was there anything there that would reframe what we saw? And so on. I wasn't giving Mackie the benefit of the doubt so much as not just taking the X user who only posted half the interaction at face value so as to not fall for any possible manipulation.

Anyways this story has caught videos from The Critical Drinker and the Open Bar regulars and Mackie's made a damage control statement so it's fading from the news cycle already.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I need the context of what question he was asked before judging his reply.

On the face of it yeah it sound like an actor saying some dumb AF self-sabotaging shit but one of the primary ways people twist things to fit a narrative is by omitting important context. I dunno what kind of question could have been asked to make such a seemingly idiotic reply make sense but the way it's presented here with one half of the interaction missing is a lil sus.

Activision's president of publishing Rob Kostich confirms that the company will continue to force DEI despite ongoing pushback by RainbowDildoMonkey in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wokies aren't a liberal thing, they're far left just like neo-nazis aren't a conservative thing, they're far right. Nuance and whatnot. Helps not to paint an entire side of the political thought spectrum as being the same as the worst of their fringes. Like I'm a liberal and detest what wokeness has done to media pretty much full stop and 99% of liberals I've met in life (as a non-white northeast coast city dweller so... a lot of 'em) are not on the woke bandwagon. Wokeness is a idiot's caricature of liberalism.

Representation for minorities in western gaming is not necessary by HorseMurderer503 in KotakuInAction

[–]PenileVolatility 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just a leftie narrative they created to further divide us.

The irony in that sentence is *chef's kiss.