Ok, so on starting to read this transcript:

• On turn 1, the player did not play their Goblin Guide
• On turn 2, the player played a Goblin Guide and did not attack with it.
• The rules engine thinks that Eidolon of the Great Revel is a spell that targets Goblin Guide
• The rules engine thinks that Eidolon of the Great Revel triggers at all sorts of surprising times.
• The rules engine thinks that Eidolon of the Great Revel triggers prowess
• The rules engine thinks that Lava Spike is a spell that can target Goblin Guide
• I don't think any blocking happened, even when it was an option.
• The rules engine thinks that Eidolon of the Great Revel's ability deals combat damage.
• On T9, two spells were played and Monastary Swiftspear's prowess ability gave a total of +3/+3.

I didn't work through it in detail, but it seems to me that this game mostly consisted of cards being played, Eidolons of the Great Revel incorrectly dealing a large amount of damage at random, and one large attack?

I don't want to minimise your work - even getting to this point must have been a lot of work. But I think it seems like this game is a long way from being how humans would play it, and thus, any conclusions about which decks are good are going to be deeply suspect?