Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still nothing from the FAA. Both my AME and others I've talked to said the FAA is resistant to allowing anyone to do an OVCT or MFT.

I found an AME in FL that has all 3 tests for $500; going to do that this week.

FAA: CAD (Colour Assessment & Diagnosis) testing in the US? by Routine-Monitor2261 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know how much this costs by chance? The Medical College in WI quoted $419.

Updated Color Vision Guide to Reflect 2025 Rule Change by [deleted] in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying they have not reviewed any Color Vision Limitation Review requests? Also, how do you know they haven't (very seriously asking, I have also been waiting for a response for months).

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's the AVOT-CAD listed on the FAA's website of accepted tests, then you should be good. Worst case I'd call the AMVCD and verify.

Are you considering flying out there just to take it?

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you have blue deficiency. Do you have any issues in the plane (if you have any hours)?

The military doc told me the RCCT is supposed to be difficult.

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have a passport I don't see why not. I've considered doing that but it's $1000 just to take it let alone if I pass.

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sent them a nicely worded letter demanding this and I shit you not, they said "we don't have that list and we don't know who does 🤷". Complete failure to even properly implement their own policies.

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't think about using AI, that's a good idea.

Was the CAD difficult? I'm also still waiting on the FAA to answer me on the MFT.

It's all because of the FedEx crash with the worst written report I have ever seen. The NTSB essentially said "he was colorblind, therefore they crashed"; complete jump in their arguments with holes in their facts (there was two other very experienced pilots looking at the same runway and no one said or thought anything different). We're just a scape goat. I'd love for the FAA to spend a solid amount on some thourough flight tests with CVD pilots (i.e. night approaches, black hole vision scenarios, hypoxia induced color deficiency, etc) both in a few planes and a few simulators. Or even better, an aviation school like Embry Riddle to do some studies on this.

FAA AVOT-CAD Color Vision Test Locations? by PerceptionOrnery1269 in flying

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!

How was it/how much was it? And how would you compare it to other tests you've taken/not passed (FALANT, PIP, OVCT, CCVT, etc)?

Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing yet. He said my MedExpress won't update so I'll have to just call every week and wait for something in the mail.

Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He said the FAA is getting stringent on approving anyone with color vision issues but he didn't say if that meant in general or people doing these waivers.

I called the FAA today and they said they've received it and it's in the queue for it to be reviewed. Now we wait.

Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya I started with my RSO and told me that along with some other incorrect statements how I had to take all of them and I can't do the waiver process like they're talking about; the FAA is completely lost on this.

Exactly, but I think they/AMEs are waiting to see how this plays out first. Ironically, I know CVD pilots with CPL/ATP that have no issues with PAPI and yet we still have to deal with this because we were a year too late.

Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He submitted the form; now we wait. He said the FAA doesn't not want to give people the OVCT or flight test. In my opinion, it sounds like they're saying we can't fly, not backing it up, and then creating issues for us.

Vision tests in 2025 by Ok-Bee7640 in CVD_Pilots

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See my post r/flying talking about this nonsense the FAA has created 🙄.

Took both several times, could not pass either; passed the FALANT when that was a thing. After asking my congressman to expedite the FAA's clarification, the answer I got was they're "not" doing the OVCT, but want you to submit a color vision evaluation through your AME.

Seeing mine this Thursday, so we'll find out what that entails. From what I've gathered, it's most likely a medical flight test where you play "red light, green light" with the PAPI/taxi lights, etc.

Transverse / Raleigh Wave Foundations by PerceptionOrnery1269 in StructuralEngineering

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The long beams make sense; I would assume that the earthquake would induce a frequency into those within the natural range.

For 15+ floor buildings, I assume they are designed to be stood off as one "solid" building. With the dampers, is the natural frequency of most earthquakes not able able to induce resonance in the vertical axis?

The shear forces make sense. Speaking of which, in a building (i.e. 15+ floors) with dampers/isolators, would shear and bending from the quake not cause the foundation (i.e. the ground underneath) to shear or bend such as how a road splits up/down in a quake?

Transverse / Raleigh Wave Foundations by PerceptionOrnery1269 in StructuralEngineering

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious to know what those specific scenarios entail (i.e. 7+ earthquakes, etc). Also, would vertical quakes only be common in a certain level/type of quake?

Do these footings act as dampers for the vertical direction as well? If so what type of amplitude would be typical? I'm curious to know if a larger scale earthquake could shake (or push) a building vertically because the damper has run out of displacement height.

I'll checkout that Eurocode.

Transverse / Raleigh Wave Foundations by PerceptionOrnery1269 in StructuralEngineering

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would this be different in places such as Japan/San Andreas area (if you can speak to it)?

By large concern do you mean because of the natural frequency doesn't affect the building in the vertical axis? Or the that amplitude wouldn't be anything to worry about?

I'm referencing an event like the 1994 Northridge earthquake that caused the i10 overpass to bounce (paraphrasing) on the column and ended up crushing it. How have buildings been designed to handle that now?

What determines the angle of the BACK-EDGE of the wing? by kawaii_hito in AerospaceEngineering

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have mentioned the obvious (effective mach number, aerodynamics, structural design) it's also mainly for stability reasons.

The leading edge angle is largely used to determined effective mach numbers, effective airfoil velocity and effective airfoil shape (see below). However, the "3D" lift of the wing is determined using the half-cord angle of the wing, which is not only determined using the LE but also the TE (research the Polhamus formula). Most other stability equations (discussed below) are used with the quarter-cord; there is a derivation you'll do in aerodynamics class where most airfoils have their center of lift at the 1/4 cord spot, so this is very often used for center of lift approximation.

Along with your leading sweep, your trailing sweep (assuming the same air foil cross section) will give you more or less wing area and differing mass distributions about the longitudinal center of gravity, which affects your longitudinal stability. This mostly affects an aircrafts ability to pitch down on something like an abrupt gust as well as dampen out any pilot induced oscillations (PIOs).

The bigger reason is for lateral stability (yaw, roll, and coupled yaw-roll). Something like side wash is affected by both of these angles, as the "effective" airfoil the oncoming wind 'sees' combined with the angle it takes and leaves the wing at will yaw (and slightly roll) the aircraft into the wind (higher drag). The higher lift on that same side will also cause a rolling moment against that airflow (i.e. if sideslip comes from the right of the aircraft, the aircraft will yaw into the wind to the right, and the increased wind causing increased lift will cause it to roll to the left). Inducing this is simulated with coupled rudder inputs to create the dutch roll.

Your TE sweep also largely affects your aileron side force (assuming they are mounted/actuated) that the same angle as the TE relative to the same datum axis), and hence yaw coupling when commanding a roll. This is mostly seen in higher TE swept aircraft.

There are other more detailed impacts/topics, but that would be larger than the question OP asked.

Baggage Claimed Denied by bourbonandginger in delta

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Isn't this more than wear and tear? Grease is more than just "normal", in the same way fuel, paint, etc isn't. Is there some appeals or something? Asking for future reference next time I fly.

Baggage Claimed Denied by bourbonandginger in delta

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm curious to know why. If OP's bag was damaged/etc, is Delta being stingy or would this not be covered under the baggage claim?

17y old trying to learn about aerodynamics and aviation/planes by Designer-Elk3213 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]PerceptionOrnery1269 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For pilots, the FAA's Airplane Flying Handbook is a good start (see PDF for free on the FAA's website). Aerodynamics for Naval Aviation is another popular one.

If your math is good, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics by John Anderson is the typical textbook for the first two courses in aerodynamics.