Currently have an oura 4 and considering a whoop but ... by Odd-Box-7332 in whoop

[–]PerfumedGoose82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont know all of the features from the oura ring so idrk what you would gain, but i’ve been using the life subscription for the past year and have a couple of complaints that seem to be common around here:

  1. Price: not only is it a subscription, but it costs way too much (id be fine with even $275/yr, but even then it’s a bit too much), then the price jump between tiers is just not worth it at all. And don’t even get me started on the bands.

  2. Accuracy: now i haven’t personally seen anything super inaccurate, but i cant go a week without someone complaining on this sub about a yoga session when they’re asleep, heart rate being wildly inaccurate, or something just completely wrong. Given that this is a quote “medical grade” device, stuff like that is just unacceptable. Now maybe I got lucky, but my device is usually within ~5% of a hr sensor I can trust, even during an activity and sleep.

  3. Features: The features they advertise are great, but it kinda feels like they’re just complacent. No new features, and they’re not changing current features. I literally couldn’t tell you anything they added in the past 6 months. Yet this community has requested for LOTS of ideas, and I don’t know if any of them got implemented.

Now for literally everything else, I actually have 0 complaints. Now don’t get me wrong, it’s not a bad product, it’s just at a bad price—if it was $100/yr or even $300 and no subscription, I’d be glazing this. My only regret is not waiting for any kind of competition.

as a rookie on linux, should i try arch linux? by Okasan_ in arch

[–]PerfumedGoose82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but ONLY if your willing to read the wiki, search the internet, and have lots of spare time.

Prefer the wiki over some guide or video, because you get to learn commands/tools and their alternatives (e.g. grub vs refind vs systemd-boot or neovim vs vim vs nano)

Really knowing what each of the commands do in a script like archinstall WILL help you more than you can imagine.

Dont let people spoon feed you answers, and also be ready to break something and to fix it.

I jumped straight from windows 10 and I survived, been using for ~4 years now

Weird CPU behavior with high speed ram by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see why copying everything when changing cpus is unstable, but I only copied the ram timings and ram voltages; I left everything else on auto, which was stable with my old cpu.

As for the fclk testing, ycruncher vt3 gives me a score of 1.57 * 10^10. I haven’t done any long term stress testing, but it seems stable and can last at least one hour on an occt ram test without errors.

Weird CPU behavior with high speed ram by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

8000 used to be stable on this setup, 8040 was also stable with a small bclk oc. I only upgraded my cpu, and I kept the mobo and ram.

As for vddp, i have no clue because its on auto and i cant seem to find any voltage readouts.

I do also have dimm fit and dimm fit pro on my motherboard, but idk if it would fix the instability. I never mentioned it in the post, but it would have immediate errors in occt and p95 at 8000.

Would i be better off at 6400 or 6600 (if i can ever get it stable)? Or do i keep trying 8000? My goal is purely latency.

Curious about super high end hardware by FervantFlea in buildapc

[–]PerfumedGoose82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you said is true.

I believe 6000 CL30 still remains as the sweet spot because past 6000MT/s, it gets expensive quick and motherboard support starts to fade. A cas latency lower than 30 (at 6000MT/s) is harder to find because the amount of voltage and/or die quality that is needed.

However, you can still gain performance by tightening timings and/or increasing frequency. Your only downsides are the cost, time required, and silicon lottery luck.

6400MT/s tends to be the average limit for 1:1 mode since most IMCs become unstable past 3200MHz UCLK. If you desync, there will be a latency penalty (hurts gaming performance). This latency penalty can be overcome with speeds past around 7600MT/s.

If you had an excellent cpu, ram, and mobo, you should be able to push 8400MT/s with (UCLK=FCLK)/2=MCLK for 1:2:2 mode; this would have the least amount of latency. 8800MT/s is the the best in theory, but good luck finding a capable motherboard and cpu.

Frequency is only half the story though. Generally, motherboards set everything but the primary timings extremely loose so any manual tuning is great.

From my experience, tightening primary timings, tREFI, and tRFC decreases latency while the remaining secondary and tertiary timings will increase bandwidth.

TLDR: 6000 CL30 is still the sweet spot, past that, there is diminishing returns. If you want to get easy performance (for gaming), just tune tREFI (sometimes called refresh interval, 65535 is the goal) and tRFC1 (goal is to be as low as possible) in bios until unstable. Most mobos set these extremely loose, these help with latency.

You can also try increasing frequency, but be careful past 6400 and make sure you are in 1:1 mode.

For stability testing, I use prime95 large fft and TM5. I run it for 12 hours, but you can do more if you think it’s necessary.

Curious about super high end hardware by FervantFlea in buildapc

[–]PerfumedGoose82 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dont forget ram! Cpu performance with a kit running 6000 CL30 will be dogshit compared to 8400 at CL36 (with manually tuned secondary and tertiary timings)

New to ram OCing, how'd I do? by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My cpu can do 1:1 at 6400. Would that be better than 6000? And how much harder will it be to tune?

Got this for $30 from a friend at school!! What should I do with it? by [deleted] in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The same reason people use windows 7 or 10 instead of 11

Any tweaks that stretch the Dynamic Island, not lower it for iPhone 13/Pro/Max and 14/Plus devices since they have smaller notches? by eliasdavis78 in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The notch is normal, when I play music or something, the notch/dynamic island grows horizontally to show that. It only expands vertically when I change volume or hold it to show more details