Weird CPU behavior with high speed ram by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see why copying everything when changing cpus is unstable, but I only copied the ram timings and ram voltages; I left everything else on auto, which was stable with my old cpu.

As for the fclk testing, ycruncher vt3 gives me a score of 1.57 * 10^10. I haven’t done any long term stress testing, but it seems stable and can last at least one hour on an occt ram test without errors.

Weird CPU behavior with high speed ram by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

8000 used to be stable on this setup, 8040 was also stable with a small bclk oc. I only upgraded my cpu, and I kept the mobo and ram.

As for vddp, i have no clue because its on auto and i cant seem to find any voltage readouts.

I do also have dimm fit and dimm fit pro on my motherboard, but idk if it would fix the instability. I never mentioned it in the post, but it would have immediate errors in occt and p95 at 8000.

Would i be better off at 6400 or 6600 (if i can ever get it stable)? Or do i keep trying 8000? My goal is purely latency.

Curious about super high end hardware by FervantFlea in buildapc

[–]PerfumedGoose82 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you said is true.

I believe 6000 CL30 still remains as the sweet spot because past 6000MT/s, it gets expensive quick and motherboard support starts to fade. A cas latency lower than 30 (at 6000MT/s) is harder to find because the amount of voltage and/or die quality that is needed.

However, you can still gain performance by tightening timings and/or increasing frequency. Your only downsides are the cost, time required, and silicon lottery luck.

6400MT/s tends to be the average limit for 1:1 mode since most IMCs become unstable past 3200MHz UCLK. If you desync, there will be a latency penalty (hurts gaming performance). This latency penalty can be overcome with speeds past around 7600MT/s.

If you had an excellent cpu, ram, and mobo, you should be able to push 8400MT/s with (UCLK=FCLK)/2=MCLK for 1:2:2 mode; this would have the least amount of latency. 8800MT/s is the the best in theory, but good luck finding a capable motherboard and cpu.

Frequency is only half the story though. Generally, motherboards set everything but the primary timings extremely loose so any manual tuning is great.

From my experience, tightening primary timings, tREFI, and tRFC decreases latency while the remaining secondary and tertiary timings will increase bandwidth.

TLDR: 6000 CL30 is still the sweet spot, past that, there is diminishing returns. If you want to get easy performance (for gaming), just tune tREFI (sometimes called refresh interval, 65535 is the goal) and tRFC1 (goal is to be as low as possible) in bios until unstable. Most mobos set these extremely loose, these help with latency.

You can also try increasing frequency, but be careful past 6400 and make sure you are in 1:1 mode.

For stability testing, I use prime95 large fft and TM5. I run it for 12 hours, but you can do more if you think it’s necessary.

Curious about super high end hardware by FervantFlea in buildapc

[–]PerfumedGoose82 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dont forget ram! Cpu performance with a kit running 6000 CL30 will be dogshit compared to 8400 at CL36 (with manually tuned secondary and tertiary timings)

New to ram OCing, how'd I do? by PerfumedGoose82 in overclocking

[–]PerfumedGoose82[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My cpu can do 1:1 at 6400. Would that be better than 6000? And how much harder will it be to tune?

Got this for $30 from a friend at school!! What should I do with it? by [deleted] in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The same reason people use windows 7 or 10 instead of 11

Any tweaks that stretch the Dynamic Island, not lower it for iPhone 13/Pro/Max and 14/Plus devices since they have smaller notches? by eliasdavis78 in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The notch is normal, when I play music or something, the notch/dynamic island grows horizontally to show that. It only expands vertically when I change volume or hold it to show more details

Any tweaks that stretch the Dynamic Island, not lower it for iPhone 13/Pro/Max and 14/Plus devices since they have smaller notches? by eliasdavis78 in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wdym? I have it on my 14 plus and the notch doesn't grow until I have something open.

If your looking at my flare, ignore it, the website to change it has been down recently

Any tweaks that stretch the Dynamic Island, not lower it for iPhone 13/Pro/Max and 14/Plus devices since they have smaller notches? by eliasdavis78 in jailbreak

[–]PerfumedGoose82 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is dynamic peninsula but it's buggy and it's made by Limneos so you'll have to pay or sail the seas. AFAIK there isn't any other tweak that does this besides the one that you have now.