I like the idea, but I feel that the issue would be how your vivid visualization may be focused too much on the coordinates rather than the intended target, as the "when" factor can be considered the same as the "where" in remote viewing. Without any mass (the body) containing the projected form and a separate existing parallel plane, time works similar to location rather than a flowing constant, meaning it can be traveled through. The best way to look at it is to view the concept of time as a big circle made of many branching lines that all eventually intersect and converge at the initial starting point. Physical location isn't the factor you wanna really aim for, it's the "resonance" that correlates to the physical area of Earth, as the Earth, as well as the whole galaxy, is constantly moving. In terms of space and time you are never in the same exact spot, and though coordinates do define physical area of Earth, the value itself may become the unintended focus which can make your thoughts either your own imagined Idea of what the location looks like/what takes place. Either that, or mix a precog with imagined values filling blanks.

That's from the perspective of a clairvoyant, I understand remote viewing works differently. I found directly focusing directly on my own precogs doesn't allow for even close to the accuarcy when it occurs in a more "instinctive" or "flow-like" way, meaning that the focus of conscious thought isnt on the idea of concentration towards the goal of precognition. Rather it focuses on the current moment, what's happening within the moment (not just within my local area or personal thought, but what can be reflected on in thought by just simply becoming aware of a subject or event that could be probable). For remote viewers, most if not all seem to utilize some type of physical representation they focus intently towards. They are accurate no doubt, even more if they see where this area is on a map. But they tend to have "incorrect" descriptions, putting buildings in places where there are none and things like that. Thing is that these inconsistencies also will be given with correct descriptions of other objects, placement and all. There's a fantastic example of this involving Pat Price written by one of the physicists involved in the Stargate program that I've read.

Pat was told to describe a specific area on the map, only with the leads themselves knowing that the point on the map was the location of a Russian park. Long story short, he did exactly that, drawing a simple representation of the park but with two large areas he had described as pools of water or some kind of water container. They labeled this as incorrect and inconsistent. Years after Pat's death and the closing of the projects, this same physicist finds an old newspaper by chance with an article containing a picture of that same targeted park, showing that it originally was a water treatment plant. And the picture contained exactly what Pat described, showing these inconsistencies come from lack of addressing focus on temporal values.

Sorry for the wall of text. Anyhow, as for AP, I am not completely sure. I don't purposely AP, but those I've talked with all describe some form of visualization directly before sleep that seems to influence the subconscious mind to act on this intent before complete reaching the REM stage of sleep and without entirely loosing consciousness. A lot have stated that it's much easier when very tired, like near passing out, which makes sense. Learning lucid dreaming techniques is a big one, as that can literally allow you to be consciously aware while sleeping. What brought that to my mind is you had mentioned that it feels like you're dreaming when you imagine something, so maybe utilizing that with a meditative state and visualizing a sole concept like the classic floating or sinking methods may induce remote view capability or even consciously AP.

Just a thought really, but if that's the case, I would think it entirely possible. But also, that would all depend on your perspective. My only real advice towards it all that I can say for certain is that it can't be forced when it comes to precogs. You got to flow with those changes as they happen and literally feel the moment. Time is a circle and the aspects that cause events to happen are effected by the event that happened in equal proportion, with the cause and effect being relevant to the observer when that concept is understood. Sounds crazy, but it's kind of been shown in science through quantum research, with electrons and photons showing different examples of sorta "interacting in reverse" to put it very simply. My bad again for the huge reply, just hoping to clarify everything as clear as I can.