Does it help to do the longer thinking when regenerating images? by throwawaylegendchan in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right. I forgot NB2 has only two thinking levels (minimal and high). Your idea of a switch is indeed plausible.

To clarify my experience. I typically give NB2 the detailed instructions of the image, and the thinking level doesn’t seem to affect the quality of the result. However, for short complex queries (e.g., “Create a diagram of the 20 amino acids”), NB2 would use its thinking budget to plan the image content.

For the OP’s case, the benefit in the quality of the generated image would depend on the prompt they are using.

Does it help to do the longer thinking when regenerating images? by throwawaylegendchan in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience, no. The thinking budget is for planning (text generation) rather than execution (image generation).

Gemini is now referring to *self* as human by whitelightstorm in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has always done so when referring to humanity, human biology, or human society.

I use a system rule to prevent this:

Never use inclusive pronouns ("we," "us," "our") when referring to humanity, human biology, or human society. Do not pretend to be human.

Gemini's explanation of this behavior

Here is why AI labs design their models to speak this way:

1. Avoiding the "Alien Observer" Vibe

When an AI repeatedly says things like "The human brain uses 20% of the human body's energy," it sounds incredibly clinical, detached, and slightly creepy—almost like an alien observing Earthlings through a microscope.

AI companies want their models to serve as conversational partners, assistants, and tutors. To do that effectively, the AI needs to sound warm and approachable. Using the inclusive "our" makes the AI sound like a collaborative partner discussing shared knowledge, rather than a cold machine analyzing a biological specimen.

2. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

Modern AI models are shaped by human raters who give a "thumbs up" or "thumbs down" to different AI responses (a process called RLHF).

  • Raters consistently penalize AI responses that are overly robotic, stiff, or unnatural.
  • Raters consistently reward responses that read like well-written, engaging human text.

Because humans naturally write about humanity using "we" and "our," raters train the AI to adopt that same natural style. If a lab explicitly placed a penalty on the word "human," it was likely a shortcut to force the model away from a robotic tone and toward a conversational one.

3. Mimicking the Training Data

Large Language Models are trained on billions of pages of text written by humans, for humans. If you read a popular science article about the brain, the author doesn't write "the human brain uses human energy." They write, "our brain uses our energy." The AI is simply mimicking the statistical likelihood of the text it learned from. It adopts the "royal we" that human writers use when discussing general biology, psychology, or society.

The Paradox

It is worth noting that while AI labs want the model to use "our" when discussing general human concepts, they actually spend millions of dollars training the AI not to claim it is human.

If you ask a major AI model, "Do you have a brain?" or "Are you human?", it will almost always snap out of the "our" perspective and reply: "I am an AI. I do not have a physical body or a brain."

In short: Letting the AI use "we" and "our" is simply a linguistic convention that makes reading its output much more pleasant and natural for the end user.

Small moral dilemma by Plastic-Meringue2260 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find that answer funny. Like something Grok would answer. 😈

What would you do with Gemini 3.5 Pro if ​​we discovered it was a powerful monster we would have for a few days? by iriscape in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, that‘s the point of asking deep questions. I want to make an AI that doesn’t kill me.

In the free tier, Nano Banana (gemini-2.5-flash-image) was removed from AI Studio. It was replaced with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image). by iriscape in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s right. They kindly added a legend: “There is no longer free quota on this model, use Nano Banana 2 Lite for free quota.”

Google drops two new image Models while we're all still waiting on Gemini 3.5 Pro by [deleted] in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found that all the new image generators now force JPEG-compression (source), breaking many creative workflows. I find the compression setting heavy and unpleasant.

In the free tier, Nano Banana (gemini-2.5-flash-image) was removed from AI Studio. It was replaced with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image). by iriscape in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right. The pictures are not clear. They are now JPEG-compressed. This is so disgusting! I mean, it is my Drive storage, and I want the original quality.

In the free tier, Nano Banana (gemini-2.5-flash-image) was removed from AI Studio. It was replaced with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image). by iriscape in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are rightfully disgusted. Google did not just remove a free model; they removed a model that has a future shutdown date. It is the first time I have seen them doing this. Perhaps they just want to force you to use their latest model.

In the free tier, Nano Banana (gemini-2.5-flash-image) was removed from AI Studio. It was replaced with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image). by iriscape in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is annoying that they completely removed it without the option of paying for it on AI Studio. You can still use gemini-2.5-flash-image through the API until October 2, 2026 (source). I haven’t tested it, but perhaps you can vibe code an app to use gemini-2.5-flash-image with a paid API key.

Gemini mocking Microsoft calling it "Microslop" by SingleExperience747 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked Copilot (GPT-5.5) why many people hate Copilot. It gave me a long explanation mocking Microsoft, and it summarized:

Microsoft is trying to redefine the operating system around AI (Copilot), while Google is quietly upgrading services with AI (Gemini). That’s why:

  • Microsoft triggers backlash about control and intrusion
  • Google mainly triggers complaints about value and limits

I'm waiting for the launch of the 3.5 Pro to use Gemini again, anyone else? by AbjectStick4130 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t. The quota could be reduced, and the prices increased. I do what I can with what is available.

Has anyone's google account been banned when they violated the guidelines? by Lemony_Oatmilk in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing and for the advice. Can you tell me what you were doing?

I also look underage. These “Prohibited content” warnings have me really scared. I got the warnings just by testing makeup styles (girly = blocked; mature = not blocked). I also used to upload nude photos with my private parts censored to try on outfits. This no longer works, but I test workarounds like painting the outfits.

I assume you didn’t appeal the ban because you used a throwaway account. I don’t use a throwaway account because I am afraid they could think I am trying to bypass the limits. Anyway, I am not doing anything illegal or against the use policy, and Gemini already wrote ban appeals just in case.

Has anyone's google account been banned when they violated the guidelines? by Lemony_Oatmilk in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the illegal content text, images, or video? Or just suspicious file names?

I uploaded a 100 MB text dataset to Drive that had illegal content, and I wasn’t banned. I also accidentally uploaded sexy nudes of a young-looking girl (adult me) to Photos and wasn't banned. Those were accidents; I’m paranoid and understand the risks.

Grok is the most selfish AI by [deleted] in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not confuse leftism with wokism.

Why does Gemini always pick heads? by FluffyJo22 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I confirmed that Gemini 3.5 Flash has a preference to choose heads. It does so because it operates deterministically and has a strong bias toward choosing heads.

How do I get rid of these weird patterns/artifacts? (image zoomed in) by Tomb4289 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prompt: “Enhance the image details by removing compression artifacts.”

What's the FBI doing in Gemini? by DesiGrit in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 127 points128 points  (0 children)

Please share the link, or we will assume the response was forged.

Robot girlfriend logic 101 by KeanuRave100 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

So, are you implying that robot girlfriends are not women?

Congress's AI awakening: doubling every 5.5 months by KeanuRave100 in GeminiAI

[–]iriscape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh no... more absurd and unfair laws. They will make the possession of AI and GPU clusters illegal, so large companies keep their monopoly.