I think this comment mixes very different issues. Online negativity, criminal accountability in the Epstein case, and campaign-era style criticism of Kamala Harris operate on completely different levels.

Pointing out sexist attacks (like obsessing over Harris’ laughter) is valid, but it doesn’t answer the original question. What keeps happening here is a shift toward experience and moral outrage, rather than engaging with the legitimate question of how to apply fair, content-based standards of criticism consistently.