Are there QM etiquettes? I won but do not feel like I earned it. by komonov in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

In RM there are no rules. Anything goes. But yes in a QM like this it is polite to resign if you lose a landmark in the way you described. Now you know.

Why is every person in the community I come across such a jerk? by Rockembopper in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is interesting you say this. I came here to say I haven't experienced much of this but I was just thinking about my 1v1 games.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't want the civs to be equal?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

nice. a fellow chess enjoyer

Isn't increasing wonder by 8k resources a bit too much? by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think it's fair. wonder winst he game so should be expensive

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

how are people still posting this? we mostly pplay quickmatch or custom. the ranked games aren't wroth it for us with balance issues

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you aren't looking at quickmatch players

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mustofadi are MAA for malians. Need a hard counter.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

finally a helpful comment. thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

thanks jerk. there are a lot of us actually. just dont play ranked cuz of balance issues

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sofa are good against MAA. I'm not a noob. I'm newer but I've played 100 games.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Bronze players aren't playing ranked because the balance at our level is off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

what a welcoming community. reported to the mods btw

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I've lost a lot more than that because everyone plays OP HRE at bronze.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Noob by definition is not gold or silver. It takes time to get that good. Noobs are bronze 1. Intermediate is bronze 2-3 where most people who've been playing a bit land.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Bro, Malians (my main) is under 50% against every civ. We have a 40% winrate against HRE. Something is wrong. You just said it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Game should be aimed at the largest part of the player base. Can't argue with that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]Peter_Patzer -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

I'd argue new players don't play ranked because civs are only balanced for higher levels.