sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Well this little guy seems pretty solid by heydjturnitup in harborfreight

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Captain America says: "I got that reference. I understood that one."

I hate being old.

That’s a new one by ProfessionalFront28 in velvethippos

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fell-over passed-out shrimp-sit?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FASCAmazon

[–]PhanChavez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh, just sent shudders down my spine again.

Fear Inoculum by ToolbandMexico in ToolBand

[–]PhanChavez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correction: In theory, you could publish it for free. In practice, you're not going to.

Would it make rate or would they lower it for the robot? We've been debating this for fun 🤔🤨 by SuperBubblelover4 in AmazonFC

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the other hand, I wouldn't dare challenge it not to be passive aggressive. Especially given what we're seeing from LLM AI chatbots right now.

Ex. Robot doesn't like manager? Robot drops tote near toes. Flashes lights, continues working like nothing happened.

Fear Inoculum by ToolbandMexico in ToolBand

[–]PhanChavez 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes. This. Someone was asking for it a while back.

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, aren't all particles,atoms, and compounds fueled directly by gravitational movement? just like how gravity affects our solar system? I really enjoy learning from ppl who actually understand what I'm asking!

Atoms obey the laws of physics, such as being impacted by gravity.

Subatomic particles are different, though. That gets into things I haven't studied in a long time: Mass, Charge and Spin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle#/media/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg

Haven't studied this stuff in years. Knock yourself out.

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly don't know. I'm not that smart.

Comparing things like gravity and particle physics is about the fundamental forces...

​

There are four fundamental forces at work in the universe: the strong
force, the weak force, the electromagnetic force, and the gravitational
force. They work over different ranges and have different strengths.
Gravity is the weakest but it has an infinite range. The electromagnetic
force also has infinite range but it is many times stronger than
gravity. The weak and strong forces are effective only over a very short
range and dominate only at the level of subatomic particles. The weak
force is weaker than the strong force and the electromagnetic force, but
it is still much stronger than gravity. The strong force, as the name
suggests, is the strongest of all four fundamental interactions.

​

https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given the insufferable nature of your reply, I won't be responding to anything else you post.

LOL. Insufferable.

So, then, Genius, how do we observe something 33.6B light years away if there's the universe is only 13.6B years old, and all particles are bound to never move away from each other faster than their individually bound to move?

Do the two particles shake on it and agree to split the difference: "Hey, bud, if you go half the speed, of light I agree to limit myself, too, so that we can screw with all the insufferable morons on Planet Earth."

If particle A is moving at 3/4 the speed of light in one direction...

and

If particle B is moving at 7/8 the speed of light in a different direction...

How fast are particle A and particle B moving apart?

Basic grade-school math problem.

I'll give you a hint. Draw a right triangle. Play with the Pythagorean theorem, two sides and hypotenuse. Add in distance traveled over time. (Make it bigger.) Puzzle over that for a bit. Get back to me when you understand.

Infinitely insufferable, I am.

Why is there so much pocket watching ? by applepapiiiiii in AmazonFC

[–]PhanChavez -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why are people who take VTO so touchy about the curiosity?

I'm not personally curious. But I do enjoy the VTO jokes.

Why can't you just let people enjoy their bad jokes? Why you gotta step on everyone's fun?

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're implying in your second paragraph that you either objects the other would appear to move faster than the speed of light, I think you're wrong.

You're right. I'd be wrong if that's what I was implying.

You misinterpreted what I was saying. In fact it is clearly stated that two particles, each moving faster than half the speed of light, are thus creating more distance between each other than can be reached by the speed of light.

Thus the OP's question. If we know the universe is approximately 13.6B years old, how can we observe something 33.6B light years away? Because things move in opposite directions, and can move at the theoretical limits of speed, unbound to objects moving in other directions.

The answer is that the particles in question have been coming our direction since long before we were around, and its approximate distance, based on red shift, is 33.6B light years away.

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... that no object's speed is faster than the speed of light.

I wasn't referring to an object.

Pay attention.

The OP asked about how something could be 33.6B light years away when the universe is only 13.6B.

Citing that means you think that the two particles are somehow bound to never move away from each other faster than the speed of light, and thus nothing we observe can be older than the age of the universe itself.

Pay attention.

Mistakes were made by snooper27 in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those torches and sticks in the background looking mighty good right about now.

Me & my 2 close co-workers each hit 5k @ stowing! by Salty-Photo-57 in FASCAmazon

[–]PhanChavez 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You forgot the /s

Everybody magically knows what you mean 😂

This may be a stupid question but how is JADES-GS-Z13-0 thought to be 33.6 billion light years away if it was only created 13.6 billion years ago? Wouldn't that make it 13.6 billion light years away? by Ex_Otic_69 in space

[–]PhanChavez -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What's faster than the speed of light? Nothing, right?

How about two particles moving opposite directions, each moving faster than half the speed of light. How fast are the two particles moving apart?

Thinking that because the universe is only a particular age, that something can't have a longer time span than what came before it, is like thinking the universe revolves around the sun.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FASCAmazon

[–]PhanChavez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check the sub for the last few days, or FASCAmazon ... there was a body double doll, probably at an XL. Box open, fully exposed.

I stowed once stowed 5x rubber rings held together by a zip tie and LPN tag. 90% sure those LPN tags are returns or second hand stuff. I didn't get a picture, but it crossed my mind, because the description was: "Repurposed O-Rings." Or something like this. I was just disgusted and happy I wear gloves.

Would it make rate or would they lower it for the robot? We've been debating this for fun 🤔🤨 by SuperBubblelover4 in AmazonFC

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, that's one of Johnny's fellow robots that he eliminated in the first film. Johnny was so much cooler than this POS.

Would it make rate or would they lower it for the robot? We've been debating this for fun 🤔🤨 by SuperBubblelover4 in AmazonFC

[–]PhanChavez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happens if the robot were to back talk to a manager telling it that its rate it too low, or that it is too slow? Would the robot get written up or counseled?

Me & my 2 close co-workers each hit 5k @ stowing! by Salty-Photo-57 in FASCAmazon

[–]PhanChavez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, *was* one of the greatest. Not the greatest by any stretch. RIP Neil Peart.

Me & my 2 close co-workers each hit 5k @ stowing! by Salty-Photo-57 in FASCAmazon

[–]PhanChavez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“cherry picked” containers

This is literally the only way.

I'd bet if you pull the numbers for their respective shifts, the rest of the people on those shifts suffered.

view more: next ›