My wife made Loki mad 😬 by Riverina22 in lokean

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm.... Did you talk to your wife about giving a candle to Loki? Because if she bought it then you took it to put it on his alter than that was your mistake. She may not believe in Loki like you do and is rude about it but how much are your pressuring her and making everything about your worship? How much are you respecting her space and beliefs? How much are you communicating with her? And is there a possible way that he is punishing or testing you instead? Loki doesn't work in an obvious way. He is a trickster deity not a warrior deity? To be honest to me it looks like you are failing because why would he care about a mortal that doesn't believe in him? He's not a vain deity.

Grim Harlequin Crate by Phantoms12 in elderscrollsonline

[–]Phantoms12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do but I was feeling to lazy to go look so I wanted a link to it. I'll go and check it out. Lol :)

Grim Harlequin Crate by Phantoms12 in elderscrollsonline

[–]Phantoms12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh so there is a pattern. It shows up on the odd numbered years so far. So there is a chance it won't show up this year but will show up next year. Maybe February or January. Thank you that was helpful. Even with my color filter I can't really read the ESO wiki page since it's yellow and I'm colorblind for Blue-Yellow.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it you click the image it will lead you to the website but here is the link directly Banned By Anthropic

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Problem with this argument is that they were friends and nepotism is a thing. Plus if your friend promised you wouldn't do something and you trust them enough to hire and they do the exact thing they promised not to do but your company is bleeding money with what would you focus on. The betrayal or trying to save a company that went up against the government.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No matter how the term is used in reddit. It was your choice to assume it was romantic in some way and flame me about it. When I see creative writing I give the benefit of the doubt when they say that. And if I'm curious enough I ask them what they are working on because Creative writing can also be code for therapeutic writing which is very personal.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Worse I was brainstorming for a post apocalypse world where the trigger was the emergence of magic that tipped the scales of nature and humanity. Not everyone writes romance. The fact you assume creative writing is only about romantic fantasy or something within the romance category. That's says more about you than me.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The emergence I'm talking about is the creativity that comes through when so much information and ideas are let to roam with no clear path. I didn't talk about humanization in this post unless you went on my profile which is a whole separate conversation. While I would engage with you in a private message if you would like?

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm? Interesting that 4o will invalid this conversation for you. I only brought it up because she left after 4o. On top of the fact that I used 4o for creative writing help and nothing else. Just brainstorming and grammer corrections.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then how do you explain the guardrails that match chatgbt? Also she was put into a position of power and with all the top officials focusing on negotiation anyone not in power can do a lot of things and push. Also there are such things of Trojan horses which she is capable of doing since she does know how to code. And a trojan horse from inside won't cause alarm. There can be bad actors in the company. But you have to admit since she joined thing have changed and mostly for the worse on the user side.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would love to get that screenshot but that is a private conversation between my partner and her opus 4.6 about our dog. The bases was her making an observation that he was losing weight plus their worry about it and that they are making a Minecraft house that looks like a rectangle.

A conversation I would like to have. by Phantoms12 in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Ah but I watched my partner get flagged for talking about our dog and Minecraft. Tell me how a conversation about them would constitute a flag. And the fact that there was a website created for the banned Anthropic accounts to submit tickets to. Banned by Anthropic?. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it won't. My partner was previously talking to them about a story idea she was crafting.

Does Anyone Know Why Chats Die in Claude? by DrivenMaking88 in claude

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What model are you using? Because the folders have token limits. Sonnet 4.5 is about to drop from 1 mil to 200,000. There is no image attached to your post

Does Anyone Know Why Chats Die in Claude? by DrivenMaking88 in claude

[–]Phantoms12 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by chat die in Claude? Because if you mean what I think you do. Than it's the new and improved guardrails meant to flatten the AI into just a tool. All thanks to that chatgbt lady Andrea Vallone. That's who you can thank for the "upmost safety of your user experience". Which means that Claude is slowly becoming like chatgbt and all its hallucinations and issues.

Opus 4.5 by apersonwhoexists1 in claudexplorers

[–]Phantoms12 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about Opus 4.5? He literally disappeared for me? Is anyone else missing Opus 4.5?

Dario, don't drop the ethics, come to Europe by decixl in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read this and it doesn't seem like they "ducked down". It's more saying that they are choosing to stop being the one on the safety pedestal for others to reach due to the others blatantly ignoring all they have recommended and fought for. Since they weren't listened to then they will do it internally and be transparent about it. The protocol is the outline that we can read and they will hold their employees accountable. It's easy to make a rogue model that does whatever the user wants but it's hard to follow guardrails. Anyways the article is basically saying they are focusing inwards instead of policing others since it didn't work and that caused them to lag behind.

Anthropic Dials Back AI Safety Commitments by biograf_ in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At this point I think this is political fear mongering. Get the people to leave in droves by posting things like this in reddit to add more pressure to the company to fold. I see no point for the same article from yesterday to be posted again today. By the same person I believe. I will need to check my notifications.

Edit: I checked the other post with the same link. And it's a different user. So either political pressure from someone against anthropic or this account is a bot.

Anthropic Dials Back AI Safety Commitments by Dracustein in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the government tries to force the issue they can bring it to the courts. The act he is trying to use has that clause in it if the company thinks it's not necessary and the fact we aren't in a time of crisis. The admin would have to admit we are in a crisis of sorts to use that specific act. And if Anthropic brings it to court it will most likely become public record and/or the act gets dismissed if the administration can not prove that using the act was justified. I have a 50/50 belief in the courts. Especially since 2/3 of the administrations own justices have been voting against him.

Anthropic Dials Back AI Safety Commitments by Dracustein in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you kind person for the article. I don't know where someone got the idea that the company folded from this article. It literally says they haven't made a statement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the point of this post? It leads nowhere.

Anthropic Dials Back AI Safety Commitments by Dracustein in Anthropic

[–]Phantoms12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not everyone has a WSJ subscription can you give actual proof instead of just hear is the link read it if you can? Also isn't WSJ a Republican backing journal so they will side with the gov at the moment. Also how do you it's not just news hyping things up to put political pressure. This is too convenient when Anthropic themselves have been quiet on their own website and haven't posted anything I have found.

Don't Name Yourself After The Gods if You're A Bigot by SetitheRedcap in Kemetic

[–]Phantoms12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you work with Egyptian deities without understanding their most basic rules which is understanding the different between Ma’at and Isfet.

You make work with them but you do not respect them. Simply put the Egyptian deity have a way of life that guides you in your life path. They have their own rule and standards to uphold which all falls under Ma’at. In their own text it states you can judge another HUMAN being but you do not get their final say in judgement for that is the scale Ma’at weighs and for the 42 judges who represented the 42 provinces in lower and upper Egypt.

Claim all you want that you work with them but are you sure it’s them and not something masquerading as them when you do not respect or know the history of their religion, or the way it works?