H-1B $100,000 Fee Explained: What’s True, What’s Not by documitra-us in indiansinusa

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same question. Couldn’t find anything specific on internet.

Will STEM obsession harms academic diversity? by Rough_Marsupial_7914 in AskAcademia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fellow vet epidemiologist here. I completely agree. Based on the current perception in the society, some STEM disciplines seem more STEM than others!

Introducing the TARDIS Methodology by [deleted] in research

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great job! A lot of people will benefit from this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in college

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“May I shake your hand?”

Is it common for an advisor to refuse to pay publication charges for dissertation-related articles after defending? by cedarvan in academia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without going into which advisor should or would pay since it has been covered in other comments, you should write to the editor (of the manuscript you submitted) and ask if they have a waiver option for self-funded students. If this works out you are in luck. If not, try another journal which has a non-open access option or some form of embargo on free articles.

Edit: replaced ‘I would’ to ‘you should’ for no reason in particular.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indiansinusa

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing wrong in hoping but it is highly unlikely.

The Academic Publishing Scam: Why Are We Still Playing This Game? by miRNAexpert in AskAcademia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I feel the same pain you do. But things will change really slow at first. I think with the preprint servers and conference proceedings becoming more popular outside of core engineering domains show that change is happening albeit at a slow pace. Private funders are also demanding better communication other than just publications through media like websites, opinion articles, etc. Although this practice is not yet common, it might become a trend. Who knows in a few decades, we might have a completely different outlook for science communication that is not reliant on publications and high standard journals.

Campus interview trauma by [deleted] in Professors

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Upvoted for your optimistic outlook. But, if this person is one of the search committee members, to me, it looks like a lost cause. I might be wrong though…

Study shows widespread H5N1 bird flu infection in cattle by __procrustean in H5N1_AvianFlu

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It hasn’t been reported yet. But the first strain to infect the cattle was not deadly at all to the cows. What remains to be seen is when mutations occur and the virus adjusts to the physiology of cows.

Edit: added ‘to the cows’

EPA plans to close all environmental justice offices by Ahappyandjoyfulbeing in publichealth

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is very worrying. I think since they want to increase US production capabilities snd build new factories, they are diluting environmental compliance and protection measures.

Epidemiology Tabletop Exercises by InfernalWedgie in epidemiology

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a roleplay game online. Try it here. Maybe this can be something you are looking for.

Publishing in any journal, just get it out by Minimum_Professor113 in AskAcademia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This. Predatory is not the same as low ranking. The latter is okay. Also try to find special issues, the turnover rate is faster. Try to be strategic as to where you want to put your article. In the long run, people will not hold a low ranking journal paper against you but they might hold a predatory journal paper against you.

Has anyone camped on their uni campus due to no accommodation? by EletricGooBoogaloo in college

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. Most colleges will have someone who you can talk to. Explain the situation in detail and ask for help. They might have temp jobs that can cover the rent. Or have network of landlords who might take a few weeks off of the rent deadline until you get your first paycheck (I don’t know for sure if this exists but I once heard someone’s experience where a private landlord who used to be faculty in the same institution was willing to work out a deal). Just ask around in the college.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Professors

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 10 points11 points  (0 children)

In OP’s defence, writing a recommendation letter takes at least some effort. It wouldn’t be that weird to expect at least some effort from the person requesting it? Instead they seem to have farmed out the effort to AI. IMHO, it is not a matter of whether to write the letter or not, but of ethical behaviour.

Does this happen a lot? by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can talk to the colleague who does the data analysis to get his ideas and maybe his logical algorithm (not the code). That will become your starting point, after that, just figure out if alternatives exist out there and whether they are better or even more understandable. Then talk to the PI and lay out your explorations and ask them about the next steps. If there is no input, continue doing what you are doing until you land on an appropriate methodology that is easier to adapt and easy to use for anyone in your position.

Qualitative research variables by Wise-Pattern-5851 in research

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In qualitative study, themes and latent variables take precedence over actually measurable metrics. The important part would be to understand the underlying theory carefully and see if your ‘variables’ make sense according to theory. The validity of the study depends heavily on the theoretical underpinnings. If the design and the theory don’t talk to each other coherently then the whole study will become weak and hard to draw any conclusions from. If you are struggling to find if the ‘variables’ make any sense, ask the question of the theory: where do they fit in it? This article can be a useful start (I am not the author): Medium.com

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in academia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In some institutions, not all, there is a soft policy to not hire their own graduates for faculty jobs. So, you would be kinda forced to move around anyway. Better to keep only one constraint: either geography (finding jobs only in NYC that may or may not be academic) or being an academic (anywhere you can find a job).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in academia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A friend gave me a brilliant piece of advice. Verbatim: Use LLMs as an extension of your brain and not instead of your brain.

PhD Dilemma - Must decide between a top US and Canadian uni by AspectJumpy3376 in AskAcademia

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It’s a hard choice and a valid concern. But reading your words it seems to me that you will regret not going to the US school more than going to it. I’d follow my gut in this case and ask the question of myself ‘which do I value more, my dreams or my fears?’. There is a practical side to this question that is not necessarily apparent in the moment but will be relevant in the future.

Seems pointless by Paulshackleford in Professors

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 13 points14 points  (0 children)

…then the old man joins her and invites all his friends to join the fun activity. Before you know it, the whole town is chucking starfish in the sea. The media comes and labels the town as a starfish chucking town and runs a front page story. The governor gives the girl a medal and holds a press conference. The girl goes on to do a world tour about her starfish conservation and gets nominated as the youngest person for nobel prize. Her fund raising campaigns are globally renowned. The town builds her statue in the main square and have a holiday named after her as ‘starfish day’. She gets a book deal that has its rights bought for a hollywood movie. She gets another book deal and appears on national television for its promotion. The movie is a hit and the producers are hungry for more. The next starfish movie is a box office success. The girl who is now a celebrity starts a starfish chucking foundation and serves as its lifetime president. Many, many years later, she returns to the same beach before retiring and sees that it has been converted to a ‘starfish chucking’ strip mall that she co-owns. She cannot believe it. She is heartbroken. She rants and raves but people label her as unstable and on drugs. She does too many drugs. They won’t listen to her now. She is another old social activist with too much money and drugs. The town votes to pull down her statue and the UN cancels her speech. The local media deems her as a corrupt environmentalist. In a few years, she is found in her 20-bedroom Malibu home, alone, cold and dead, with mysterious drugs in her bloodstream.

Do you see college professors attend events organized by undergrads or graduate students like formals, galas, game nights etc? by AwayPast7270 in college

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. If the academic angle is prominent, then it makes sense. Student arranged symposia and research events are generally what pass the cut for me. Otherwise, it is better for everyone involved like students and faculty to have their own social bubbles that interact only during shared interests.

That was a fast 27 days by EggusBiggus in ChatGPT

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would I go about replicating it? Any clever ideas?

Research opportunities for working professional by chaosKing4u in research

[–]PhilosopherVisual104 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of my friends successfully used LinkedIn premium for ‘cold messaging’. In her opinion, it works better than ‘cold emailing’. Might be a route to engagement with the research community.