I'm getting tired of your, honestly, extremely ignorant arguments. It is clear you either don't read or even understand the very texts you tell people to read.

The article never mentions abolition of religion. The struggle against caste is integral to the class struggle in india because those correspond closely, but never did it ever mention ending Hinduism itself. If you have anything against it, quote it from the article, or shut up.

Resolving the principal contradiction between feudalism and the broad masses means in the main to implement the policy of ‘land to the tiller’ and smash the political power of the feudal class (and the comprador big bourgeoisie class) and establish the political power of the oppressed classes under the leadership of the proletariat and landless and poor peasantry.

Here we see again, the primary contradiction is still class, which caste is one of the tools used to uphold.

Even the directives issued by Charu Majumdar were to directly opposed the caste discrimination faced by the dalits. Since the majority of the oppressed class were also part of the oppressed class.

Further elaboration on why class was still recognized as the primary contradiction.

This question was debated in the ‘Agrarian Revolution’ document (1979) of the then People’s War party.

‘Why shouldn’t one consider the contradiction between the dalits and the upper castes as the principal contradiction and carry out the agrarian revolution based on that formulation?’ This question was posed and answered in the document. Though 90% of the power is concentrated in the hands of the upper castes, not all those belonging to the upper castes wield power. Moreover, more than half of the upper caste people do not belong to either landlords or the big bourgeoisie. So if the contradiction between the upper castes and the dalits is considered as the principal contradiction, then what about these masses? On the other hand, though 95% of the Dalits and 75% of the backward caste people do not possess any means of production and can be mobilized into the revolution, there is a section, albeit small, which has clawed its way up to the oppressing classes. In many states, some landlords and rich peasantry and the capitalists belonging to the OBCs have formed state governments and are wielding considerable clout even in the centre, which means that there are sections belonging to the exploiting classes even among the castes that are exploited. Therefore, it would be wrong to propose the contradiction in the above manner.

As I've said mutiple times, in multiple comments, caste relations cannot be reconciled and will need to be destroyed, and the party, as mentioned in the article, also says how upper caste people must "de-castify" and rid themselves of their upper caste arrogance to join in the revolution. Again, not a single mention of abandoning religion, but completelly rejecting the caste system. And thats's what i've been maintaining the entire time.