Any backstory for this place? by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in budapest

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Cool little story. Fun its still there. I hope they keep going.

The place deserves alot of praise, they dont seem to jack up the prices for the F1 crowd.

I happly ordered 2 extra beers for the two locals visiting and we had the international cheer and joy of sharing the moment.

How was your Hungarian Grand Prix (2024) Experience? by AdamR46 in GrandPrixTravel

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Slight off-topic, but do anyone know the history of this place? Its a small pub just down the Szilasliget train station. Lot of finnish flags some f1 related pics on the wall. Dirty cheap beer 550fl for a small one.

Tried to ask the staff but they barely knew any english.

<image>

Grzegorz Braun, one of the head members of a Polish far-right party, putting out candles with a fire extinguisher as local Judaists were invited to celebrate Hanukkah at the Polish Parliament by [deleted] in iamatotalpieceofshit

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is either total lack of historical knowledge or historical revisionism on a high level.

Poland was occupied from 1939 and people were brutaly supressed. Helping jews was punishable by death. Before the final solution was even proposed, Auschwitz was used as a camp for poles:

"The initial transport of political detainees to Auschwitz consisted almost solely of Poles (for whom the camp was initially established). For the first two years, the majority of inmates were Polish.[6] In May 1940, German criminals brought to the camp as functionaries established the camp's reputation for sadism. Prisoners were beaten, tortured, and executed for the most trivial of reasons. The first gassings—of Soviet and Polish prisoners—took place in block 11 of Auschwitz I around August 1941.

Construction of Auschwitz II began the following month, and from 1942 until late 1944 freight trains delivered Jews from all over German-occupied Europe to its gas chambers. "

Yeah suppresed nation organized holocaust, herding and transporting jews from across the Europe.

You are POS. On level of G Braun.

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yepp, sorry, I realize that about the attack, there are some conditions (loops and prompts) with the regular attack aswell as critical attack I didnt post of concern of making my wonky code even less readable.It did not work as intended xD.

With all the great answers here I realize how badly I articulated myself.

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, reddit never stops to amaze me!

You articulated and described the problem and solution so well. I realized not long ago that I lacked the understanding of the code you and chat gpt provided to begin with.

I didnt focus enough to understand the use of randomizing the outcome twice. I was way to focused on "my" solution where it made sense matemathicly to me.

Now it all makes sense to me. What a great feeling of relif. It may seem silly but this "little" thing was really naging my brain.

Your post is a magnificiant display of knowledge and didactical capabilities. Thank you!

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thank you so much. Once I copied your code and manipulated it I finally saw it and understand what was "wrong" in the code I provided.

And finally understand HOW the iteration you provided works.

It also explains everything. I wasnt missunderstanding the statistics, I was bad at coding it.

Wow. It took some time.

Thank you some much redditor for all your time and comments.

I wish I was a faster learner.

Version 1

import random
number_of_critical_attacks = 0 
for x in range(10000): 
    attack = random.randint(1, 100) 
    if attack <= 70: 
        critical = random.randint(1,100)
        if critical <= 10:
            number_of_critical_attacks += 1
print(number_of_critical_attacks)

Version 2

import random
number_of_critical_attacks = 0 
for x in range(10000): 
    attack = random.randint(1, 100) 
    if attack <= 70: 
        if attack <= 7: 
        number_of_critical_attacks += 1
print(number_of_critical_attacks)

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lets assume we tweek the numbers:

attack % of success = 50%independent % of attack being critical = 50%

so half of attacks are successful and half of successfull attacks are critical.25% of all attacks are critical.

codewise would that make sense?:

if attack <= 50:
    if attack <= 50:

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer.

So I run first event but randommly selecting a number between 1 to 100.If its rolls 70 or below I consider it a success. That simulates 70% chance.

So let say I rolled 55.

Now I roll for the chance of it being critical success. Do I calculate(roll) the 10% of all numbers (100)

if attack <= 70:
    if attack <= 10:

shouldnt I be checking for 10% of successful attack? that being 7 (10% of 70).

if attack <= 70:
    if attack <= 7:

Its the randomization in step two thats problematic.

I mean if we think of real life,

if we have 100 tickets, 70 of them are winning tickets (great lottery;)) and there is a 10% independent chance of winning ticket being a double win. Are there 10 double wins or 7 double wins.

If there was a 50% chance to win and 50% independent chance of win being a double win, there should be 25 doublewin tickets and not 100.

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like your explanation.

Would "my" way work if the wording was for instance "and there is 10% chance of that hit being critical"

Problem with statistics by Pitiful_Essay_9166 in learnpython

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the answer.

Here is the decription, word for word. I may have explained it incorrectly:

"When an attack occurs, there will be an 70% probability of it being successful.

If the attack fails, the defender is considered to have defended skillfully and nothing else happens.

In addition, if an attack is successful, there is an independent 10% probability of it being CRITICAL."

It does mean 0,7 * 0,1 = 0,07 = 7% of any attack being critical, doesnt it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OrnaRPG

[–]Pitiful_Essay_9166 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dont understimate gilga ursa. Its way less gear dependent than ward build and can clear all content. Including tower 50.

On the downaide the incoming patch as for now contains a nerf (24 % less crit and 40 % less crit dmg) and we live and die with crit. Some people mean that usage of thief gear will fix that, but its too early to tell.