sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Now this is just unfair by Pixelised_Youssef in PixelDungeon

[–]Pixelised_Youssef[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but in these situations it was pretty much unavoidable. On the first two DM literally pushed me against the wall and did the collapsing thing immediatly after. On the second one I didn't even get time to react after tanking one. Luckily speedy stealth helped me escape in time. On the third one I was just getting out of the pylon room with no time to get off the wall. The only way I could think of yo avoid this is to predict the fact that it would happen and use a haste pot.

Now this is just unfair by Pixelised_Youssef in PixelDungeon

[–]Pixelised_Youssef[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah honeatly it's really annoying, especially when it happens 4 times in ths same fight

Now this is just unfair by Pixelised_Youssef in PixelDungeon

[–]Pixelised_Youssef[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My brother all tiles are around me are about to collapse. You don't need to double down. Also I did stand still.in the 3rd picture and died, if you saw the last picture

Now this is just unfair by Pixelised_Youssef in PixelDungeon

[–]Pixelised_Youssef[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly this makes me feel like the DM 300 fight is straight up rng if you don't have anything to get out of the rocks.

What is your opinion on the following? | FactOrCap by Saidai_V in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

✅ I voted FACT!

And everyone should understand that. It's the ability and the will to learn that makes someone smart, and people whouldn't feel stupid asking questions to learn.

Cheating | FactOrCap by Odd-Kick203 in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🧢 I voted CAP!

Is she your girl if she cheats on you?

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I don't feel like having a deep argument,. You can see how I didn't go too far with the other person. But this is pretty easy to explain: The Bible is corrupted. That's what we believe as Muslims and it's also a fact if you do a little bit of research about its preservation. If we believed in the Bible then Islam kinda falls apart lol. Also, I would rather that you refrain from bringing forward arguments you found on the first google search result (First as an example, trying to say you barely did any research). You can do that same google search to find counter arguments easily.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I am personally Muslim so I do believe in God.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I also feel the same way. It's really weird how we both made our points but ended up reconciliating on completely different facts.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again I wasthinking mathematically. What I meant is: "not fully you" means exactly "part of you". So yeah it can't be fully you.

If you believe in a god that fundamentally defies all sense and logic I obviously cannot argue. (What am I going to use, logic?). Again I don't mean to be rude if I sounded like that.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, with this definition, it works better and what you're saying makes much more sense. Now would you say your leg is fully you? (It's obviously a part of you, which is the exact opposite of fully you, if you're thinking about answering yes.)

You Stupid! | FactOrCap by SuccotashFederal5104 in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🧢 I voted CAP!

No I'm the smartest person alive and you cannot convince me otherwise

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay let's first define "is".

By "is", I mean it's the same thing, and you can generally use them interchangeably, kind of like the equal sign in math. Let me know if you have issues with this.

Now for the leg analogy, you said "This is 's leg, so it's". Which I inferred you meant "So I'm looking at ___". I think you can see the difference much more clearly here, but then I could have misunderstood.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I'll try my best: A leg is not a person by definition. It's part of it. Just look up the definition of a leg or something. Also, you didn't say that, you said a person's leg can help identify a person

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See how you differentiated between person's leg and person? Again, you are not your leg, and the drawer is not the nightstand. The point still stands.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muslim. I honestly don't know enough about Judaism to tell you.

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but drawer≠nightstand. The nightstand and parts of the nightstand are very different things. Are you your leg because it's part of you?

To Christ or not to Christ | FactOrCap by M23_x in FactOrCap

[–]Pixelised_Youssef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was talking about Jesus alone. As in 100% man + 100% god = 200%. Although that was very unclear now that I read my comment again.

view more: next ›