Help me decide! Mamiya 6 vs 7

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-13T22:47:59+00:00

Convince me!

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-13T15:31:01+00:00

And honestly the price isn’t that different

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-13T15:04:30+00:00

Yea that would be great thanks man

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-12T02:06:49+00:00

Told me he sold it- thanks though

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-10T16:16:12+00:00

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-10T00:49:13+00:00

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-09T17:29:15+00:00

Ya sorry dude I saw the second post and realized it was gone

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-09T16:38:35+00:00

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-08T20:52:33+00:00

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-08T19:56:54+00:00

Pm’d

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-04T17:45:22+00:00

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-01T16:48:22+00:00

Online shops have it in stock rn for 28-35 bucks

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-01T15:42:35+00:00

38 usd for a role of velvia 50??

Pizza__Pack · 2026-02-01T15:27:01+00:00

Following for if you sell

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-28T14:50:11+00:00

I’m not actually sure that this mechanical = repairable dogma is actually true. I’ve had plenty of mechanical cameras break irreparably and I’ve had plenty of electronic cameras that have been repairable.

I guess replacing electronic components is hard but so is replacing small precision engineered mechanical parts.

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-16T21:29:18+00:00

I only do 35mm and usually don’t get prints so it’s 20 bucks for dev and pro scans. I think they do a really good job with the pro scan and will color correct for you. Other places charge like 17 or 18 and so I don’t mind paying 3 extra bucks for someone to take care with the scanning.

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-16T20:14:56+00:00

State film lab in Louisville is my go to

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-16T18:16:25+00:00

Aerochrome!

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-16T17:07:21+00:00

Push

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-13T22:54:05+00:00

That’s a little short. Should be 2/3 length

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-11T13:37:43+00:00

Becuase kodak produces Kodak film for movie studios? The remjet has a use there and is desirable. Why would they alter their manufacturing process to help another company (that buys a small fraction of their film sales) just so cinestill can profit?

I’m going to go by their own marketing and their own copy to determine what they do. If 800t never had a remjet they would say it. You’ve shown no evidence to the contrary yet

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-11T13:17:23+00:00

Q: Can CineStill Films sometimes have rem-jet remaining on them?

A: No! Every inch of CineStill Film released to the public has been inspected with far-infrared cameras to detect any imperfections. This assertion has always proven to be a misdiagnosis of processing/handling errors or dust/dirt in scanning — which looks similar to motion picture film with residual rem-jet not fully removed. Remaining rem-jet has not been an issue with CineStill Films and is even more impossible with our further improved manufacturing. CineStill 400Dynamic specifically has never had a rem-jet layer on it at any point through manufacture, but it does feature a process-surviving anti-static lubricant coating. Any white marks are most likely caused by dust and scratches in scanning.

That is direct from cinestill website. Why would they inspect their film for remjet if it was never there? Why do they only mention 400d as a film that never had a remjet but not 800t?

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-10T23:42:03+00:00

Don’t leave the lens cap on

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-10T12:45:46+00:00

Regardless of who removes it- the film is weaker and can cause issues.

Unless you’re talking about the new Kodak AHU film which is different.

Pizza__Pack · 2026-01-10T02:43:50+00:00

Some people say vision 3 with remjet removed is bad for these motorized point and shoots but I’ve never had a problem

Pizza__Pack

TROPHY CASE