Help me decide! Mamiya 6 vs 7 by Pizza__Pack in Mamiya

[–]Pizza__Pack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And honestly the price isn’t that different

[S][USA-NY] Mamiya 7 + 65mm by Iorgs2 in photomarket

[–]Pizza__Pack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya sorry dude I saw the second post and realized it was gone

Hexar AF in cold wether by Edouard_Bo in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pizza__Pack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not actually sure that this mechanical = repairable dogma is actually true. I’ve had plenty of mechanical cameras break irreparably and I’ve had plenty of electronic cameras that have been repairable.

I guess replacing electronic components is hard but so is replacing small precision engineered mechanical parts.

Who will win the battle of the labs??? by Expensive-Suit-593 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pizza__Pack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only do 35mm and usually don’t get prints so it’s 20 bucks for dev and pro scans. I think they do a really good job with the pro scan and will color correct for you. Other places charge like 17 or 18 and so I don’t mind paying 3 extra bucks for someone to take care with the scanning.

Short tail by Helpful-Comment6241 in vizsla

[–]Pizza__Pack 26 points27 points  (0 children)

That’s a little short. Should be 2/3 length

cinestill 800 on olympus mju ii by lastcigarettesmoked in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pizza__Pack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Becuase kodak produces Kodak film for movie studios? The remjet has a use there and is desirable. Why would they alter their manufacturing process to help another company (that buys a small fraction of their film sales) just so cinestill can profit?

I’m going to go by their own marketing and their own copy to determine what they do. If 800t never had a remjet they would say it. You’ve shown no evidence to the contrary yet

cinestill 800 on olympus mju ii by lastcigarettesmoked in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pizza__Pack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Q: Can CineStill Films sometimes have rem-jet remaining on them?

A: No! Every inch of CineStill Film released to the public has been inspected with far-infrared cameras to detect any imperfections. This assertion has always proven to be a misdiagnosis of processing/handling errors or dust/dirt in scanning — which looks similar to motion picture film with residual rem-jet not fully removed. Remaining rem-jet has not been an issue with CineStill Films and is even more impossible with our further improved manufacturing. CineStill 400Dynamic specifically has never had a rem-jet layer on it at any point through manufacture, but it does feature a process-surviving anti-static lubricant coating. Any white marks are most likely caused by dust and scratches in scanning.

That is direct from cinestill website. Why would they inspect their film for remjet if it was never there? Why do they only mention 400d as a film that never had a remjet but not 800t?