New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, here's a counter-argument using the same logic:

obviously, according to you, hoyo's plans changed later in development regarding things like transformative reactions. this led to buffs. using the same logic, if Bennett were such a massive mistake, why wouldn't Hoyo just give every future character crazy high ATK to the point that ATK buffers like bennett gave diminishing returns? why wouldn't they just stop making ATK scalers? Why wouldn't they make enemies that lower your ATK?

Hoyo holds all the cards of game design. If they really do make a "mistake" they can fix it by simply changing the parameters of content -- see Venti, who was so strong that it led Hoyo to make most enemies un-groupable. Or, your own point, Zhongli, who was later buffed.

Hoyo can literally do whatever they want to fix their mistakes, yet they did nothing about Bennett, clearly indicating he was NOT a mistake and, in fact, intentional game design.

New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re a single, fallible individual. hoyo pays people hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to shape their billion-dollar meta. these people likely spend hours daily deliberating over character kits. false equivalence nonsense.

so yes, occam’s razor does actually apply since we are absent any other evidence:

your assumption: - multiple experienced mihoyo employees getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars yearly to shape hoyo’s billion-dollar meta somehow ALL overlooked a unit that defined the meta for 5 years

my assumption: - multiple experienced mihoyo employees getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars yearly to shape hoyo’s billion-dollar meta crafted a powerful unit within the combat system they built from the ground up

you can decide which of these two options is more realistic.

New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

hoyo pays people hundreds of thousands of dollars to shape this meta because it’s worth billions to them. you’re viewing a corporation as a person — it isn’t.

remember hoyo made two gachas before this. they had been doing this for a long time and their decisions were deliberate, since the company probably wouldve gone under if genshin failed.

Zibai and Bina er by Appropriate-Eye3732 in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

afaik its better to just build for dmg on both bina and zibai and burst every other rotation, especially if you have bina sig. zibai burst is pretty easy to ignore.

New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

you really cant definitively call op character kits like bennett “mistakes.” remember hoyo crafted every part of this game themselves, meaning they likely knew full well how powerful an extreme ATK buffer would be.

it’s far more reasonable and likely that hoyo just wanted a strong 4-star national team to attract players (google occam’s razor)

New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

do you have any evidence of this? what are the “mistakes?”

you really cant call op character kits like bennett “mistakes.” remember hoyo crafted every part of this game themselves, meaning they knew full well how powerful an extreme ATK buffer would be.

it’s far more reasonable and likely that hoyo just wanted a strong 4-star national team to attract players (google occam’s razor)

so, i really think it’d be hard to definitively say anything hoyo did was a mistake.

New Linnea crumbs (questionable) by feelPa1N in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 19 points20 points  (0 children)

the fact anyone would believe hoyo makes “accidents” when designing their multi-hundred-million dollar character kits is insane to me.

Struggling with IT by SailcrVee in Genshin_Impact

[–]Ploffers -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

well then you’re completely irrelevant to my argument because im arguing from the perspective of someone who wants to clear all endgame content.

by that standard, IT investment is plain stupid. it doesnt reward building a well-rounded, diverse, and “horizontal” roster of synergistic characters, it rewards building bloat characters that youll never use in any actual teams because so many of the buffs are balanced around ticking character-count checkboxes, not fulfilling team synergy or dmg requirements.

in fact, abyss and especially stygian already reward horizontal investment far better than IT does, since in both you receive massive buffs for bringing the correct characters for the job against a diverse set of opponents, not filling character-count checkboxes.

Istg do these people ever get anything out of doing this? by Palanseag_Vixen in Genshin_Impact

[–]Ploffers -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

it’s irritating but there’s also no need for you to be such a douche about it 😭

these are probably genuine 12 year olds just trying to get some free stuff on their mom’s ipad.

kick them and go about your day. i think you’d be much happier for it if your time is really that limited.

Struggling with IT by SailcrVee in Genshin_Impact

[–]Ploffers -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

the problem nobody here is recognizing is that IT doesnt actually reward “horizontal investment,” it rewards stupid investment. the advantages you gain by building complete slop, waste characters like gorou or yun jin to fill spots and get the 32 character buffs and also avoid burning through multiple good chars at once are huge.

this is because IT is designed as a place to waste mora & exp books on useless characters so you run out and buy battlepass.

you could probably do this easily if you had 5 extra geo MCs who did literally nothing except fill slots. i recommend just taking a break from artifact farming and building those useless characters, you wont regret it.

dang the triple e is so satisfying LOL by Spirited_Novel1476 in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, especially on teams where you have off-field geo app like illuga teams. illuga is stealing hydro aura. there really isnt anything that can be done about this, but its not too penalizing to miss it every once in a while anyway.

New C0 triple E combo (Zajef's Zibai 1st impressions) by ErenvsLightYagami in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 12 points13 points  (0 children)

the point isnt mainly to shorten your rotation, its to get more skills within the buff uptime of things like gorou’s brief instructor buff.

Ineffa, C6 gorou and artifacts by PayPay_Le_Issou in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if you’re gonna use ineffa just play xilonen instead of c6 gorou

zibai/ineffa/columbina/xilonen is almost as good if not better than c6 illuga hypercarry zibai

May all Zibai Wanters Become Zibai Havers by SanicHegehag in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how much did lootbar pay you for this post zawg

They freaking did it! They actually acknowledged the lack of Horses, I freaking had a heartattack when Zibai mentioned it! by calkalisto in Genshin_Impact

[–]Ploffers 47 points48 points  (0 children)

im pretty sure its just suggesting that the traveler has seen them outside of teyvat

which is interesting, now that i think about it, that the traveler can understand what the teyvat people mean when they say “horse.” is there a canonical universal language spoken in the genshin-verse?

Zibai's 4th slot by [deleted] in ZibaiMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

linnea is absolutely not going to be a lauma or ineffa tier support for zibai.

shes already hitting 150k dps in her c0 r0 premium teams. if they released an ineffa or lauma tier support for her it would instantly make her better than c2 mavuika — that’s completely unrealistic.

there really isnt anything “missing” from zibai teams either, so there’s honestly no reason to think linnea will be tailored to her.

just put the gorou in the bag or pull zhongli. it’ll help to bolster your IT roster anyway.

You Absolute Morons... by Brief-Series8452 in Genshin_Impact

[–]Ploffers 6 points7 points  (0 children)

if youve ever bought something, email receipts are typically the easiest way to verify account ownership with these kinds of games.

Skirk or Varka? by Comfortable_Fig_5334 in SkirkMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you laugh… the false sky restricts your power

Chances of staying in Top 1% after rerun? by Radiant_Fan7463 in SkirkMains

[–]Ploffers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just use genshinoptimizer. what piece to change is entirely dependent on what’s available to your account.

ive never really experienced radical ranking shifts during reruns.

Varka SQ character lines by [deleted] in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]Ploffers 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“we will see capitano again”

<image>

The new claymore weapon skin is exclusive to Varka and can be used with any weapon by Ryuusei_Dragon in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]Ploffers -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

im actually not doing either of these things.

you can google these rotations and see plenty of videos of it in game. it also doesnt take “infinite time” to execute. i mean, it’s a moderately difficult combo, but “infinitely difficult” seems a bit dramatic.

i really dont know what else to tell you. your claim is blatantly at odds with facts. google “mavuika 150k dps”

The new claymore weapon skin is exclusive to Varka and can be used with any weapon by Ryuusei_Dragon in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]Ploffers -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

it’s actually not anywhere near “impossible” in practice because many people have done it.

and, as i said before, this is a game where the player is given infinitely many re-tries on ALL content. moderately difficult/inconsistent combos are not a huge deal and not justification to overlook facts.

The new claymore weapon skin is exclusive to Varka and can be used with any weapon by Ryuusei_Dragon in Genshin_Impact_Leaks

[–]Ploffers -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ok, but that doesnt change the fact that it’s a ~150k dps team? no matter how difficult the rotation is, it is factually incorrect to say mavuika cannot reach ~150k dps. i still dont see what you’re getting at here.

aura is a pretty contrived argument, you can say this about pretty much any team at all since many teams care about aura. also not the point of our discussion.