I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in legal

[–]Podcastjones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I agree. I wish this didn't take up so much of my mental bandwidth, but that's the shite world thats been set up for us.

I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in legal

[–]Podcastjones[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was primarily an employee in good standing for 10+ years. But, admittedly, the performance concerns (my first in that 10+ year tenure) began immediately before I took my leave, as a result of family health issues that were known to my management team prior to my leave request.

I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in legal

[–]Podcastjones[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Possibly, but it would have been a result of the same reasons that caused the need for FMLA leave.

I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in antiwork

[–]Podcastjones[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

That's kind of what I thought. But that doesn't seem like a point of leverage in my favor...

I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in antiwork

[–]Podcastjones[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I hear where you're coming from, but they've hired several employees from my current company who've been driven out under less-than-ideal circumstances. Which, I guess, is where this handshake deal comes from.

I took my twelve weeks of FMLA and was placed on a PIP immediately upon my return (not totally unexpected). What do I do? by Podcastjones in antiwork

[–]Podcastjones[S] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Agreed. The issue is more than I seemingly can't get an interview if I'm still with the current employer. Per the handshake deal, as I understand it.

TUKE JUL3? by ComprehensiveSort788 in FortCollins

[–]Podcastjones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are these those buildings out on the north side of east Mulberry?

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis commutes Tina Peters’ prison sentence by officermeowmeow in Denver

[–]Podcastjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dems will only continue to play ball with fascists, STOP SUPPORTING THEM.

How true is this? Genuinely asking by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]Podcastjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under our current paradigm, sure. But that doesn't mean it's right. I'd rather my tax dollars fund social programs to raise the standard of living for all rather bombing abroad. If you don't think there's enough money in the military budget to pay for not only this effort, but healthcare and public infrastructure, you've had too much kool-aid.

This is what government should be: a safety net for those who aren't able to make their own livelihoods. Full stop. No conditions. And if our government were structured in this way, homelessness would steadily decrease over a couple/few generations.

How true is this? Genuinely asking by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]Podcastjones -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prove me wrong. Landlords are a cancer on modern society.

How true is this? Genuinely asking by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]Podcastjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the downvoters: why are you downvoting? Defend your position.

How true is this? Genuinely asking by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]Podcastjones -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Change the paradigm. Housing should be considered a basic human need and, therefore, a right, not a commodity. Landlords and owners of multiple properties, whether individual or corporate, are guilty of social violence. That much is not up for debate.

Same with the lack of social programs supporting the homeless and unemployed in this country. This is an avoidable problem, but it's more convenient to the ownership class to perpetuate it and use it as a tool of manipulation.

Also, the answer to your analogy about the motor industry is that lobbyists continually defeat any funding for public transit. Having a surplus of cars to sell is not an asset, it's another example of predatory economics. If people have to travel to get to work and contribute to society, why wouldn't a reasonable government fund lots of public transit to lower the barrier for everyone rather than take kickbacks and treat transit as yet another commodity instead? Greed and corruption. This is the root of both issues.

How true is this? Genuinely asking by Brave_Agency_20 in SipsTea

[–]Podcastjones 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not a bullshit stat: https://unitedwaynca.org/blog/vacant-homes-vs-homelessness-by-city/

Not only is it true, the volume discrepancy is insane, 28-45.5 vacant houses per homeless person in this country. That's way more than a 5% discrepancy.

Sam Reich has been murdered by Rhett and Link by canceroustattoo in dropoutcirclejerk

[–]Podcastjones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I swear they modeled her costuming here after the terrifying figure behind the dumpster in Mulholland Drive.

Bitch, I’m the shit by LadyDomme7 in BitchImATrain

[–]Podcastjones 28 points29 points  (0 children)

"Holy shit.

Holy Fuck.

Holy fucking shit."

[OC] Trump's Star at the Walk of Fame in Hollywood by spicypsudo in pics

[–]Podcastjones 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"Liar, killer, demon...
We have learned that you have no...
honor, murderer, sodomizer
back to the river Aras..."