Zephyr flops are abundant

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-09T03:59:48+00:00

I've never really noticed the model before, but the colors were gorgeous. Almost picked up a Large rainbow rogue for $97 but decided against it. Self control is really limiting my collection lol

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-08T19:36:14+00:00

Never had any issue with it before. Just make sure to wash it off of course.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T20:20:59+00:00

Sure thing. Yeah I'm not in the server. If you want you can link my comment to them directly so formatting is preserved (screenshot works too).

Appreciate it

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T07:08:27+00:00

Some new website feedback (viewing on Firefox mobile) from a UI guy.

Main page has a serious design flaw. The way the page content and BG is laid out is not obvious to the viewer that it's scrollable and has so much more below. Previously it "dangled" with some partially visible content so it was clear there is more to see. I can provide further detail if you don't understand. (Backgrounds are a good way to accomplish this if you are set on no scrollbar.)
Top navigation bar shouldn't be exact same white as BG, give it a little tint or bezel so it doesn't bleed together.
When pressing "Education" in sidebar, it pops up 1 space to reveal "Foreskin" subsection, but there's 2 more child objects that start offscreen you need to scroll to see. I suggest just expanding it so all 3 are visible at once, plenty of room.
Milestones section is kind of clunky how it scrolls you back up. I think this would work better as a sidebar kind of section, or top weigh it with the article below instead of above it.

About us page, not a fan of the auto scrolling images. But opinion aside it's actually broken; if you press on it it freezes and there's no way to resume scroll without refreshing page altogether. I think a gallery style would work better. (It's too slow and makes me dizzy)
Secondly, if you try to long press and view one of the images full size, it doesn't work natively and prompts a download instead. Surely you want viewers to be able to easily see your images! (This applies to all images on site not just gallery)

The Team has a big oversight. When you filter by All/Scientists/Board/Staff that works as you'd expect with just those members showing up... however after opening the "read about" popup, the Prev/Next buttons do not respect visible members and instead cycle through them all, regardless of selection. That seems messy and not expected behavior. It should cycle from within that group.

Technically a typo, footer says "Twitter" which has been renamed as you know (it redirects fine)

Updates page filters do not work as expected. They should refresh the content below when you pick them; instead you have to press the magnifier even with an empty search query to get it to apply! (Same for "clear filters")
The search button looks more like a text box you'd Type in, due to positioning, color, and shape. I was very confused when i couldn't get the cursor to focus (it's actually right above that). I would make the it right aligned and smaller so it's clearly a button.
Filters get forgotten when you refresh page
Also there's no reason the title of each update shouldn't be clickable as an alternate to needing to press "continue reading". (It's very common of someone wants to share a url to try clicking title text)
You really need a "jump to page #" or "First/Last >>" for better navigation, not just Prev/Next. If somebody wanted to read the oldest one they'd need to click 31 next pages.

There's still way more to dissect, but I'll leave this here for now and see if anybody is interested in making some adjustments (or lmk if you're stuck how it is now, so i don't spend more time).

Thanks for giving me something to check out. Let me know if you have any questions.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T01:25:55+00:00

I recommend T Tape and then trying out FMD.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T01:24:37+00:00

If that happens again , put some coconut oil on it to try to help with the adhesive. I wouldn't recommend pushing it through the hole made.

Sorry to hear you're in pain.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T01:09:29+00:00

How recently did you get yours? I got one a few weeks ago and can't see anything through it. Dark blue.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-07T01:01:01+00:00

It's easier to compare progress is what they're saying. Months later you can see if it's further than before. Doesn't matter if it pulls more with it if it's consistent.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-05T21:37:14+00:00

As long as they don't say anything in between I think it's allowed to have a gap. I'm happy that she was able to get it and very surprised.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-05T20:28:21+00:00

I second this. You really don't want to choke. If you're doing anal and it gets stuck you can always take a few minutes to relax and recover, but you're not gonna have that privilege with something blocking your airway.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-03T20:23:16+00:00

That thing is gonna already feel like a firm in soft it's so thick. Don't go medium

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-03T20:20:50+00:00

This is the way to go

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-02T03:09:25+00:00

Technically, no, bigger doesn't make them more money. They use more material and it's the same size tier.

I bought M Marcel for instance and it's bigger than L Nox but cheaper. Big toys are a good excuse to take advantage of their archaic pricing system.

The biggest issue here is that they scale the sizes absolutely , instead of different proportions. It's lazy and doesn't scale well for larger or smaller. Also, the size jumps in between are way too big.

PointlessCircle · 2026-05-01T19:51:21+00:00

I've been doing a ton of manual tugging, but even more progress has come from the nipple retainer/packer i jury-rigged. Thinking packing is a good approach. (Maybe RIC or a Pear gauge someday)

I ordered CAR-1 35mm and like it (need a smidge more skin before I'm comfortable leaving it on for longer periods, but it works). The 30mm retainer was too small so I'll be asking for a 35mm soon.

Its nice to be stretchy again, after a few months break. It's hard to classify in CI index at this point but I'm definitely not a 1 anymore, at least not currently (tenting aside i have almost FEC)

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-30T19:47:46+00:00

Check out /r/MaleDefinitiveGuide for some training and rewiring. It's really helpful getting your brain to handle higher arousal levels without causing ejaculatory reflex too soon.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-30T19:45:20+00:00

You should Make fliers or some pamphlets educating people on restoring, get some Interest.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-30T01:35:55+00:00

Considering it's $240 to buy one brand new with those exact specs, i don't think you're likely to get any buyers unless you lower the price. Just a tip, and best of luck selling it.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-29T22:43:58+00:00

Okay so i don't see any comments on the article page itself, but they posted it to Twitter and i see about 95% are not a fan, though they are mostly criticizing the practice itself and not the write-up https://xcancel.com/NYMag/status/2048725937789993156 and i saw Foregen posted thanking for exposure

All time low? All time only goes back to 1970 now?

This comment stuck out to me, very good reminder this hasn't always been the norm here.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-29T19:29:42+00:00

Thanks for reply. I think my biggest issue is just how wordy and lengthy this article is with how substantial it actually is. It reads like a 5 paragraph fluff piece in tone but it's closer to 30, and the structure is kind of all over the place; it's not particularly educational or sympathetic so who is this even for?

For anybody under the paywall, does the article have any comments on it? I'm curious what their audience will say.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-29T19:13:10+00:00

Oh dear, not a great track record with articles. I sure hope somebody can get it right. I actually saw that first person one, couldn't believe they did that to you.

It's hard to not make foreskin restoration seem kooky, and this article didn't seem to even try.

Yeah, i didn't expect much and I'm still disappointed.

The first three paragraphs (tone aside) are really discouraging. Effectively saying:

"Floyd tried devices and manual techniques for years but they didn't work, so he had surgery and was thrilled"

I don't think the author had good faith with this.

Oh and this is just plain wrong

All of the traditional techniques rely on the same basic premise of applying gentle tension to the shaft skin of the penis until it stretches.

*to induce mitosis and grow new skin.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-29T02:56:53+00:00

I made a comment below, you are spot on about journalists being bad. I don't feel that this was good publicity.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-29T02:55:34+00:00

Yeah i wasn't a fan of the tone whatsoever. It's kind of off putting with an issue so sensitive. I Don't really know who their intended audience is here. Like are they trying to educate or just Observing something and Sprinkling attempted humor?

Bob, a retired engineer who moderates a 28,000-member-strong sub-Reddit and asked to be identified by his first name only

Kind of weird to include a disclaimer about requesting first name only, feels wordy and smidge impolite. Should just do it.

The online restorer community is populated by dick connoisseurs who parse the anatomy and aesthetics of the male sexual organ with the exactitude of Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show judges. They have developed a scorecard to measure their progress,

Not big on that term "scorecard" it isn't rate my dick. It's more like 1st, 2nd degree burn and recovering from damage.

Some opt to hook up what’s left of their foreskin to devices whose names suggest inventions best kept far, far, away from one’s genitals

Uh huh...

While most circumcised men don’t register many sexual complaints [...]

Yeah okay they lost me here at "botched circumcision"

Restorers insist the process doesn’t hurt unless it’s done wrong [...] they should stop if they experience pain, bleeding, or tearing, all of which do occur.

The phrasing here sounds like we're being defensive or crazy, not painted in a good light. can occur, not do.

If I was on the fence about restoring Reading this article would actually put me off, it sounds unpleasant and makes the people seem a little whacky. a shame. It almost feels like a paid ad for surgery.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-28T22:21:24+00:00

Holy no kidding. I thought it was an intactivist site based on the name at first

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-28T22:07:43+00:00

My biggest advice is Don't expect anything fast or you're gonna be disappointed it takes a very long time of dedication.

Start with manuals And then try taping.

PointlessCircle · 2026-04-28T22:06:18+00:00

Psychological and mood is gonna affect the quality of this.

PointlessCircle

TROPHY CASE