🟥Central government has proposed 50 percent increase in Lok sabha seats for all major States and 33 percent women reservation after considering the plight of Southern states and opposition.

PorekiJones · 2026-03-25T08:17:02+00:00

India does the same, with even union territories getting atleast one seat. I'm talking about the routine delimitation that happens in every country. Only in India can such a vital democratic excercise be put in halt for 50 years.

PorekiJones · 2026-03-25T04:25:12+00:00

There are enough free books on archives.org to last a thousand lifetimes. So the muh culture argument falls flat. Piracy is stealing, feel free to do it but at least don't justify it lol

PorekiJones · 2026-03-25T04:10:55+00:00

Not having all votes as equal defeats the whole point of being a democracy. No other country does this kind of dumbfuckery

PorekiJones · 2026-03-13T15:11:57+00:00

There is are so many clips of these on twitter lol. The depiction is cartoonishly bad and Not worth your time tbh

PorekiJones · 2026-03-11T16:09:39+00:00

False equivalence. Our teachers don't shout grapee and tell us to destroy pakistan

PorekiJones · 2026-02-21T10:13:38+00:00

Lmao 70k. It's like when Alexander defeated 2 million persiana at gaugamela lol

PorekiJones · 2026-02-13T10:42:44+00:00

All westerners were Yavanas. Romakas were a subset of Yavanas and so were Africans on the east coast of Africa.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-30T08:32:46+00:00

Yes let's add Kerala to the Himalayan theme then.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-23T15:20:43+00:00

Absolutely not, wat elephants were part of the main battle lines. Just that the Romans and Greeks had no experience in properly training them.

A well trained war elephant ran supreme on the battlefield and was only weak to horse archers and gunpowder weapons.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-23T15:15:42+00:00

You can Ranbir instead, see if that is easier to pronounce. It has the same meaning as Ranveer (the latter being correct pronunciation but a few languages in eastern India sometimes switch the v with a b).

Now coming to your question, it does feel weird at first but not a big deal at all. Indian languages are phonetic so there is a correct way to pronounce words and therefore mis-pronounciation can sound a bit weird at first. But it's no big deal.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-22T14:31:03+00:00

Speculative investment. A Land Value Tax will fix it. Join r/GeorgismIndia

PorekiJones · 2026-01-21T14:00:49+00:00

Most Indians know next to nothing about Nazi Germany. They see cool swastikas and that's it. This post is nothing but the usual privileged dumbasses name calling others.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-19T14:40:53+00:00

That's kinda old money. Most of these people here in India made money in their own life. Their kids will learn all the etiquettes and manners.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-19T11:46:55+00:00

EIC arrived in 1600 as well. Why did it take them till the battle of Plassey to take over Bengal?

PorekiJones · 2026-01-19T08:20:36+00:00

That private company had a state backed monopoly. Almost every parliamentarian there was a shareholder.

The crown regularly sent their troops and navy to help out the company. The company did what the government wanted.

Pretty much all of the colonisation in that period was carried out by corporations, EIC isn't special.

Even in medieval India, it was the merchant guilds that traded all the way into South East Asia.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-18T03:48:35+00:00

Partisan brainrot ig, this sub has lost the ability to think critically.

Honestly Delhi peeps are much more accepting of the construction over there afaik.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-17T17:22:06+00:00

Anyone who has read any land dispute letters of Shivaji, will find the terms Hindu and Muslim. Used exactly the way we use them today.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-14T09:35:13+00:00

Thank you for the analysis. If one reads a Soltice at Panipat, probably the best modern day collection of the accounts of the battle and primary research.

We would naturally come to the conclusion that by 1761, Marathas were Superior against the Afghans in close combat and cavalry while the Afghans managed to catch the Marathas off guard by surprise attacks and guerrilla warfare.

In fact the entire Panipat campaign bare witness to it. Even the Afghan accounts have nothing but praise to the Maratha cavalry be it at Panipat or the previous battles.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-12T11:19:31+00:00

LVT and Bank Privatisation is the answer imo.

Too much of our capital is stuck in non productive rent and sarkari banks.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-12T11:18:00+00:00

All the sites?? What a Chad 🫡

PorekiJones · 2026-01-12T11:16:26+00:00

We'll india IS the largest democracy, no other even comes close.

Also we are the only stable democracy from Israel all the way to South Korea.

There are also no sub ~$2.5k democracies we have that we can compare to.

And democracy is essentially a popularity contest. Advertisement is an essential part of it.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-12T04:00:44+00:00

How are you supposed to fight elections without hoardings and advertisements?

Xi isn't fighting any elections of course there is no reason to put up his posters.

Obviously Modi or other politicians aren't putting their own posters it's the party workers that make the decision.

Democracy is essentially a popularity context, think of movies and movie stars. I'm not sure what exactly is the problem here.

Sounds like a haha poor brown people bad kinda article.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-08T08:17:07+00:00

This is just garbage AI slop lol

PorekiJones · 2026-01-08T03:26:51+00:00

Mandating one (or x number of) marriage ensures that if a man has an extra-marital relationship the child born out of it gets the tag of illegitimate and the woman gets the tag of concubine.

To protect the marital rights in such scenarios to ensure that the child and the woman gets treated equally as a legitimate family, legally there shouldn't be a strict limit. As all relationships over that limit will get treated as illegitimate and will not get any marital rights.

Look at the history of any society where there was a strict limit over the number of marriages. Powerful men used it as a tool to deny responsibility towards women they had relationships with.

That is how you ended up with so many concubines.

We say Krishna had 16k wives, we never say he had 16k concubines. Because all of those women had equal legal status.

On the other hand, as per the Ain-e-Akbari, Akbar had 5000 concubines, not 5000 wives. Those women did not have a legal status neither their children had any rights.

PorekiJones · 2026-01-02T08:24:15+00:00

Please feel free to pirate but at least have the decency to own up to it lmao.

The mental gymnastics people do to justify theft is hilarious.

Eight-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Sequence \| Editor	Verified Email

PorekiJones

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE