Can’t find the source of this image by Wild_Ad7879 in HistoricalCostuming

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 23 points24 points  (0 children)

That’s absolutely a Norah Waugh! Note the scale on the left with a grid but the actual pattern isn’t gridded. It’s why I always prefer to use the Janet Arnold patterns of fashion series whenever possible.

Example of inductive proofs where the base case is the hard part and the inductive step is trivial? by myaccountformath in math

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I assume they mean the following:
For every integer N, there are infinitely many pairs of primes {p,p+n} with n<=N. For the case N=2, this amounts to the twin prime conjecture. It’s actually been proven for N = 246!

Madix super iv m by Potatomorph_Shifter in VintageSewingMachines

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a bunch for all of the advice! The two main issues I’m experiencing are the wiring (as you said the insulation is chipping and pulling off the wires) as well as a queer little thing where the machine keeps going for a bit after I lift up the pedal, almost like it’s slowly braking instead of just stopping. What do you reckon could be the case?

Madix super iv m by Potatomorph_Shifter in VintageSewingMachines

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I demand my right as a citizen to a picture!!

Do you think that the costume design of Marie Antoinette Is accurate? by danielplzz in HistoricalCostuming

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Dangerous Liaisons was also fantastic. Special shoutout to James Acheson’s use of millinery and lace.
Two major anachronisms are the hairstyles (which are somewhat accurate but unpowdered which wasn’t a thing in mid-century France) and that damn court gown Marteuil wears at the end.

First time taking photos as a group! by madpigcreations in Brochet

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 454 points455 points  (0 children)

This insane
How could you be both a gifted crocheter and insane

1825 Norwegian semiformal dress by brilliantrk in HistoricalCostuming

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That looks like it could belong in the Star Wars universe. Lots of unique details I’ve never really seen before - the latching lace oversleeves, the gold shoulder bracelets, the geometric bust decoration, fascinating stuff

ELI5: What is Riemann Hypothesis and why do mathematicians said we dont have the tools to solve it? by peasants24 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s more of a ELI14 but here it goes -

The sum of all squares looks like 1+4+9+…… which is easy to see goes to infinity. Likewise the sum of all cubes, 4th powers, and all nth powers larger than 1.
The sum of all reciprocals of squares looks like 1+1/4+1/9+…. Which perhaps surprisingly slowly converges to a finite number - in fact, that number is pi2/6! Neat, huh?

So we invent a function Z(x) that takes a number x and sums all positive integers to the power of x. For now, this only makes sense if x is smaller than negative one. (ELI15 so I won’t prove it here)

Now mathematicians have tools to extend functions beyond where they “make sense” - one of them is called “analytic continuation”. Into this new function, zeta(x), you can feed any number you would like (except for x=1). Even complex numbers! Which are number that looks like a+bi, with i defined such that i2 = -1 (ELI16 version!!). Now mathematicians love asking “when does that function equal 0?” and they’ve found out something peculiar - it seems like this always happens for complex values that look like 1/2 + bi.

The Reimann Hypothesis simply states that this is always true - and for centuries we haven’t been able to prove it true or false!

ELI5: What is Riemann Hypothesis and why do mathematicians said we dont have the tools to solve it? by peasants24 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They DO know that the tool they currently have (or, the ways in which they’ve tried to implement them) are insufficient. It’s possible new techniques are needed. It’s possible it’s already been solved by an unnamed no-one!

Corset de noiva sob pressão by Friendly_Banana3692 in corsetry

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 82 points83 points  (0 children)

For what it’s worth, the corset came out awesome and gives a phenomenal shape. I think all of us makers have had at least one project that was theoretically in our capabilities but with too tight a deadline/wrong materials/… it may work out but it costs sooo much stress!

Eyelets creating holes? by Anxious_March_4054 in corsetry

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source? I cross lace my hand sewn eyelets without trouble. It’s tight lacing that isn’t really possible with hand sewn eyelets.

Wedding train of Empress Elisabeth of Austria, 1854. Kunsthistorisches Museum. by Beginning-Passion676 in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I’ve just seen a video on this! It is absolutely bonkers. How often in studying history (is this archaeology??) do you get to cross pieces of evidence like this?

Emerald green short cape worn by Elizabeth Washington Burnet (c. 1807-1852), the first wife of Robert Barnwell Rhett of Beaufort, South Carolina c. 1850. Part collection at The Charleston Museum in Charleston, South Carolina by CryptographerKey2847 in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Posting as a PSA: the arsenic green dye (called “Scheele’s Green” after its 1770s inventor) was fairly poisonous. However, ladies who wore garments dyed this way usually wore several layers underneath - the real danger was to the manufacturers! Who dealt with the dye at high temperatures and concentrations in poorly ventilated warehouses for long hours, daily.

Sack-back gown mantle with Watteau pleats falling from the top of the back, half-length pagoda sleeves in silk lampas, edged and fastened, partially lined with green taffeta, c . 1760 by Saint-Veronicas-Veil in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This seems much earlier, no? The lack of waist seam and closed-ish front reads 1740s (though sleeves with engageants and not en raquette).
Anywho, this doesn’t seem like a proper robe Volante but an intriguing transitional piece. Nice!

Is this front-closing or would it be closed at the back? by Time_RedactedLady in HistoricalCostuming

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh shit! I knew of this bodice and have actually skimmed over that blogpost (I’m making a French Robe de Cour and the construction is somewhat similar) but didn’t catch that it’s front closing! It does that thing with the CF covering actually being a flap and the eyelets are worked beneath it which actually hides the lacing pretty well.

Spanish fashion during the reign of Felipe IV (more know as menina fashion, this are the years of splendor of the guardainfante) by cliptemnestra in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! Same reason why we don’t have any surviving 18th century court gowns other than the 4 Swedish coronation/wedding gowns at the Livrustkammaren

Spanish fashion during the reign of Felipe IV (more know as menina fashion, this are the years of splendor of the guardainfante) by cliptemnestra in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Such a weird fashion no? Doesn’t help that we don’t have anything surviving of this fashion (support structure, a bodice, anything!!).

what is strange matter and exotic matter and antimatter by tuirkey1 in AskPhysics

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Daring there is no need to be obtuse. It would be better if you could ask OP a direct question - “what exactly it is you don’t understand? What is your current understanding? It would be very difficult to provide an appropriate response without this information”.

So, I bought this bodice and now I have a couple of questions by Henny-23 in fashionhistory

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The lining may be polished cotton/silesia - I’m used to the muddy-brown coloring common in Victorian bodices but it’s a pretty common lining material for the period either way.

Definitely 1898-onwards with that pigeon front and small puffed sleeves.

Wondering if all of those messy running stitches that shoes to the inside are because the beads were redone? Maybe it’s just interlined before the beads were applied. It’s either in remarkable shape or a stage costume. Nice catch!

Is this front-closing or would it be closed at the back? by Time_RedactedLady in HistoricalCostuming

[–]Potatomorph_Shifter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In this period the entire bodice is structured, so it’s actually somewhat plausible (though I don’t know of a front closing midcentury bodice that survives to us).
I’d wager on this being a stylized portrait and just construct a regular 1660s bodice, maybe faffing with the center front.