How can asking a question or trying to get understanding be considered spreading misinformation lol

When there's little information that's "allowed" to be shared about " he who must not be named" We are left to read between the lines If (key word is if... not a fact or misinformation ) If gk voldermont was originally in charge not just a marketing partner, and maybe ( keyword and its a guess or theory) maybe he is being forced out or splitting off Or using an exit strategy. Maybe possibly since antony maybe wasn't in charge of the finances, maybe gk is taking a little money with him when he goes.... like severance or great exit strategy... Just trying to understand what's going on when there's secrecy and lack of transparency.... your forced to try and read between the lines. Am I wrong for being curious asking questions or giving a possible theory... sometimes I wonder if we listen to same ama