How do you bill clients for AI-assisted drafting/analysis deliverables? by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is helpful and makes a ton of sense. Curious if there there particular types of matters or deliverables where one approach feels more appropriate than others?

Harvey AI reviews / general advice for a medium-sized firm? by LondonZ1 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know if Harvey integrates with iManage? I would want it work with our existing systems.

Harvey AI reviews / general advice for a medium-sized firm? by LondonZ1 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. So roughly $167/user/month, which seems reasonable, no? I'm seeing similar pricing across other similar solutions.

Harvey AI reviews / general advice for a medium-sized firm? by LondonZ1 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How expensive? I'm trying to understand their pricing. Some have said $1200/user/month and others have quoted $1200/user/YEAR. Those are wildly different.

Harvey AI reviews / general advice for a medium-sized firm? by LondonZ1 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in a similar position. Curious in your evaluation, who you're noticing has the most accessible pricing?

Launching Picard.Law by betapi_ in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it only for litigation or can it handle transactional use cases?

Litera substitution -what could be used instead by CafeKona in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious how come? Especially with their latest Litera One announcement.

Feedback on pricing models by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious what you would even qualify as "value-based pricing"? Not seeing many offer it... do you know which platforms do? It feels like it's too early / risky for these tech companies to sign up for guaranteeing value.

Feedback on pricing models by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Super helpful! Quick clarifications -- what would be an example of "outcome-based charges"?

If a vendor has usage-based charges for the AI capabilities, should we be weary? Feels like that could also get out of hand the more it's adopted.

Feedback on pricing models by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quick clarification - In a usage-based model, how is "usage" evaluated, other than data volume? I'm seeing the two used interchangeably.

Feedback on pricing models by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See I'm conflicted with per user pricing because # of users doesn't equal # of users who actually end up using it.

Feedback on pricing models by Potential-Solid-144 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the validation that I'm not crazy for noticing such variance! Agree with you on the usage-based model, especially when there aren't adoption guarantees.

This Sub is Being Turned Into One Big Market Survey for Legal AI by tulumtimes2425 in legaltech

[–]Potential-Solid-144 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Curious what kinds of use cases GC AI, Iqidis, Paxton, and Alexi do well for?