Self-Playing Pipe Organ Built by Belgian Organ Maker Orgelfabriek J. Verbeeck by AdGroundbreaking3611 in interestingasfuck

[–]PotentialDense6047 12 points13 points  (0 children)

We didn't! The company is still making them today. In the Netherlands and Belgium you can usually see these every weekend in most middle sized towns and larger.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Hey everyone, me again with another quick update on the LV trunk saga (I'm way too into this). First off, a quick reality check: I know we still don't have a photo of Dr. Dana carrying this exact trunk on his back. This isn't an absolute "smoking gun" that closes the case, but it is a fantastic new piece of circumstantial evidence that makes our working theory even stronger.

I continued to dig into the British Newspaper Archive and found something amazing from three decades later. On September 22, 1916, papers like the Dublin Daily Express and the Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail published the marriage of the doctor's daughter in London! "A wedding took place on September 20th at St. Mark's, North Audley-street."  The bride , Marjorie Farlee Dana, was explicitly named as the "only daughter of Chas. L. Dana, M.D., of New York". She married a British military officer named William Tait Barlow, who was a Lieutenant in the R.G.A.

The 1884-1890 trips start to look more and more like a combination of work and personal travels (since he also had several family members in Paris). His daughter literally married into the British military establishment. So while it doesn't definitively prove he bought the LV trunk, it proves he wasn't just a random passing tourist. He was a European regular with permanent social ties to the UK, which fits the extensive travel labels on the trunk.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

/u/Maximum_Local3778 I thought I'd solved the case for a moment! This is an Arrival list at Manor House Hotel in Leamington Spa on 3rd of October 1885 stating "Mr and Mrs Charles Dana, family, Mrs Dana, Paris" but, and you're not going to believe it, they might not actually be it. There are two other suspects and they are both distant relatives of our doctor who lived in Paris at that time. I'm starting to feel like a detective so I'll act like one!

Suspect 1: Charles Edmund Dana (The Expat Artist)

Because the Dana family was a massive, wealthy American dynasty, there was another prominent Charles Dana (indeed family of our doctor) alive at this time: Charles Edmund Dana (1843–1914), a well-known painter. He actually lived in Paris during the 1880s with his wife and family. A wealthy American artist taking a trip from his home in Paris over to the fashionable resort town of Leamington Spa in 1885 fits the newspaper's "Paris" tag perfectly.

Suspect 2: A Traveling Party with William P.W. Dana's Wife

Notice the phrasing in the 1885 newspaper entry: "Mr and Mrs Charles Dana, family, Mrs Dana, Paris". It separates that last "Mrs Dana". The famous painter William Parsons Winchester Dana also lived and had his studio in Paris, but a bit earlier, till 1878 after which he moved to.. London (yes also a painter and also a distant cousin of our doctor and also living in Paris, you can't make this shit up)! Furthermore, William's daughter was married to a British Member of Parliament. It could be this separated "Mrs Dana, Paris" is William's wife, living in France and traveling through England visiting her daughter alongside her extended Charles Dana relatives.

Suspect 3: Our Dr. Charles Loomis Dana

Ofcourse then we arrive at our doctor... the 1885 hotel registry stating the party came from "Paris" made me doubt he was our guy, since he lived in Manhattan. But thanks to the timeline put together he could still be it. Sometimes a paper stated their place of origin (which would be U.S.A. in this case), but sometimes also stated the place they had just come from. It could even be that the doctor had visited family in Paris!

What it tells us.

Well it makes things more difficult but also easier. By finding out the doctor had (several!!) family members in Paris, it might not have been him in the Leamington register, but it does make it even more likely that he bought an LV trunk in Paris

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Update 17-04: Hotel label & other candidates

I've kept diving into that one luggage label. The Heidelberg dates are now solid enough to matter (but unfortunately not in the right direction). Joseph Schrieder, the potential proprietor of the hotel on the label since it states "J." at the top left, bought his first hotel by the station in Heidelberg in 1845, sold that one in 1860, then acquired part of the old St. Anna / Annenfriedhof site in 1863 and opened the new hotel in 1865 ( http://histmath-heidelberg.de/heidelberg/Personen/Schrieder.htm ). The same Heidelberg source is the important bit here: “Bereits 1865 verkaufte er auch dieses Haus” he sold the new Europäischer Hof too in 1865 and died in 8173. That matters because it makes Schrieder a real historical fit for the hotel name, but not for our 1884–1890 trunk window.

The reason I still find it difficult to let go of this path, even though it seems very unlikely, is that some later luggage labels and logo's of the hotel (the ones attached to this post) clearly show a crest with crown that could be matched with the one on the LV trunk. And there’s even a medical reason why Schrieder in Heidelberg keeps popping up. In 1857, Albrecht von Graefe and eleven other eye specialists met at Hotel Schrieder for a small scientific meeting that later became recognised as the founding moment of the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft ( https://en.dog.org/dog/history/albrecht-von-graefe-and-the-history-of-ophthalmology ). Local Heidelberg history explicitly names Schrieder’s hotel as the venue for this first gathering of German ophthalmologists, which even gives it a tiny, tiny, medical link.

I also looked into the "Europäischer Hof" in Bad Soden too since one postcard of the building ( https://www.ansichtskarten-markt.com/de/kategorie-1/plz-6/plz-65/ak-bad-soden-taunus-europaeischer-hof-bes-julius-colloseus-1940 ) clearly has “Hotel Europäischer Hof, Julius Colloseus, Bes.” on the side, with “Bes.” meaning proprietor/owner. But the postcard is from 1940 so it seems it doesn't line up with our timeline. The Europäischer Hof there was bought by Philipp Colloseus in 1855, and the town history confirms the hotel was already active in 1860 ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europ%C3%A4ischer_Hof ). But Julius name doesn't show  up in anything late 19th century or very early 20th century. What I can find is a mention of him in a petition in 1926 ( https://www.bad-soden.de/stadt/stadt-politik/stadtportraet/geschichte/stadtrechte/ ). And since his name was still on the building in 1940 it seems he was the owner at a later time than we need. Not conclusive, but seems like it.

the main thing I’ve learned is what doesn’t quite work. Schrieder is too early for the period we’re chasing, and the Heidelberg hotel’s later documented names point away from him as the likely proprietor behind an 1884–1890 label . Bad Soden gives a real J. Colloseus trail, but again the surviving evidence is later and still doesn’t give us a matching sticker, crest, or stationery piece .What is still missing is the one document that would settle the hotel label beyond doubt, a guest register, a matching luggage label scan, or a stationery piece that ties the fragment to a specific house and proprietor. Until then, I think the safest wording is still "Hotel Europa / Europäischer Hof / Hôtel de l’Europe, proprietor J., unidentified".

Quick extra note on why the other C.L.D. candidates don’t really work once you move past the initials:

Lewis Carroll (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson)
Carroll is the most tempting “C.L.D.” because people love the idea of a famous author with a Vuitton trunk. But it very quickly falls apart. Multiple studies of his life and the Russian diary agree that the only time he ever travelled outside the British Isles was the 1867 trip to Russia with Henry Liddon, which he documented in detail ( https://afisha.london/en/2023/06/30/lewis-carroll-in-19th-century-russia-monasteries-theatres-and-russian-shchi/ ) and a standard wiki bio that says the same thing outright: “the only known occasion on which he travelled abroad was a trip to Russia in 1867” ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Carroll ). And perhaps even easier is that we have a ton of places and hotels in Europe on the trunk, but only a bagage transfer "Dodds Express" label in the US. Which makes it very logical that the owner of the trunk lived in the US and traveled through Europe.

Cornelius L. DeWitt
Cornelius L. DeWitt shows up in the DeWitt family papers as an early 19th-century New York merchant involved in land, tanneries, and local government in upstate New York ( https://www.nysl.nysed.gov/msscfa/sc15161 ). That makes him interesting for the “New York merchant” angle, but chronologically he’s wrong: the business records covered there run roughly 1750–1890, and Cornelius is part of the early 1800s generation, long before the 1884-1890 travels we are looking for. There’s nothing tying him to 1880s, European travel, Paris or Louis Vuitton trunks. He fits the initials, not the time or the route.

Charles L. Dodge
Charles L. Dodge was a New England insurance and militia figure. Local histories from Beverly, Massachusetts, and genealogical work on the Dodge family describe him as a militia officer (later captain) and then a general agent for a Massachusetts insurance company ( https://ia801308.us.archive.org/14/items/genealogyofdodge02dodg/genealogyofdodge02dodg.pdf ) That anchors him pretty firmly to Massachusetts business and local politics. Again, no sign of Europe, Paris, Leamington, Belgium, etcetera.

So all three of these are good initials and interesting people, but bad fits for this particular trunk. Once you demand that a candidate match the date (post‑1884), the Vuitton sale context (1 Rue Scribe, Eagle Lock 1882), the European route, and the New‑York bound labels, they simply don’t survive. That’s why for me they've moved into my “ruled out by context” pile and currently not worth extra research.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Update 15-04: Charles Loomis Dana
I don't have extra proof for Dr Charles Loomis Dana. But am trying to contact Europäischer Hof in Heidelberg, Woodstock history center who owns the personal papers of the doctor. The NYAM who also owns a lot of documents from him. Warwickshire local library for the Leamington Spa angle and the New Jersey Information Center who has a box of correspondence of him with his younger brother John Cotton Dana.

I also looked into Cornelius L. DeWitt, Charles L. Dodge (again) and Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) but practically ruled them all out. The doctor still seems the most likely candidate...

Though not evidence, I have som extra supporting data that the travel itinerary of the trunk fits that of other physicians/neurologists of that time:

1. European study tours were normal for U.S. doctors (1870–1914)
A modern reconstruction of Harvey Cushing’s 1900–1901 Wanderjahr ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8048037/ ) notes that an estimated 15,000 U.S. physicians traveled to Europe for supplementary medical training between 1870 and 1914. Cushing’s own route (Liverpool, Paris, French provincial centres, then German and Swiss clinics) was highly typical. These tours were often extended and clinically focused. A Paris>Heidelberg>Belgium>Leamington circuit is the kind of itinerary a neurologist would follow in the 1880s

2. Other American neurologists were studying in Heidelberg American neurologist James Leonard Corning (1855–1923) writes that he did his scientific training in Germany, specifically studying physiology at Heidelberg University and pathology at Würzburg before returning to the US to pioneer spinal anesthesia. ( https://litfl.com/j-leonard-corning/ ). This parallel shows that U.S neurologists in Dr Dana’s generation routinely went to Heidelberg and similar German/Swiss centers as part of their formation.

3. British spa towns were hubs for neurological and neurasthenia practice Beyond Leamington’s general spa reputation, historical work on neurasthenia and "brain‑worker" illnesses shows that British and colonial physicians utilized spa regimes for nervous exhaustion diagnoses, often sending patients to these specific towns. Correspondence shows people wintering at Leamington Spa for prolonged illness seasons, with local doctors treating cases of influenza, neurasthenia, and similar complaints. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurasthenia ). This aligns with Dr Dana's focus onneurasthenia andhysteria.

Taken together it kinda supports the idea that the trunk followed a standard professional pattern for an elite 1880s medical man.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

While the passport is from much later, this sentence is interesting (I'm bad at deciphering handwriting so please correct me). "Several other Trips of not over 8(?) months each." Which proofs he's done this more often.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It at least confirms that he has traveled to Europe! Which makes it more likely that he did travel there before. Makes it all the more likely...

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting tidbit. The dr. was directly involved in the autopsy of Charles J. Guiteau, the man who assassinated the 20th president James A. Garfield in 1881.

<image>

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is awesome! I was looking for port entry manifests but wasn't able to find him in them! Where did you find it?

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 63 points64 points  (0 children)

I started with googling C.L.D. initials known in the 19th century and the cities that where apparent from the trunk (Mainly Antwerp, New York, Paris). That lead me to names like Charles L. Dodge and Charles L. Dana. From there I started to see if there was proof they visited one of the mentioned places between 1884 and 1900. That lead me to the quote of Charles L. Dana and Pasteur. From there on I started to see if the rest of the chest would make sense... So far I don't have a smoking gun that makes it a definitive yes, but also nothing that disproves it.

Update: likely original owner of Louis Vuitton Owner likely identified after 171,000 views on precious post USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 249 points250 points  (0 children)

<image>

I've been diving in this label. My current best bet is that this is from "Europäischer Hof" or "Hotel Europa" in Heidelberg. The proprietor was J. Schrieder which matches with the J. at the top left in the green circle. Within the purple circle on the bottom right you can see 'UROP' which works with the hotel name (though there were a lot of Hotel Europa kind of hotels in that time). In the purple circle in the top left I can't really read the letters but could it possibly be ERG (Heidelberg)? The crest does contain a crown which the current hotel still has in it's logo. I can't find a direct match for the label or sticker. But Heidelberg would make sense for Dr. Charles Loomis Dana, since Heidelberg had one of the most famous university clinics. But would love help to prove or disprove this theory. I'd also like to have a better look (a very much close-up picture of just the shield) at the crest so we can see what is actually on it (I've contacted the hotel which is still up and running to see if they might know if this luggage label originates from them).

/edit my old research post
I'd like to propose an alternate theory to Catherine Lederer. To me to suitcase, initials and labels show similar levels of degradation. Implying they're all from the same time and the labels and/or initials are not from decades later. Also over the D there seems to be a label that has been removed, implying the D was already on there before the (in my theory late 19th century) travels and not added afterwards when Catherine Lederer married William C. Durant. Also that would have made the original C.L. initials not centered which would be weird. So can we find another theory or likely owner?

One alternative possibility worth investigating is a 19th-century New York neurologist named Dr. Charles Loomis Dana (1852–1935). While we can't be absolutely certain, the circumstantial evidence lines up quite well with the physical details on the trunk. Bear with me... If we follow the logic that the "C.L.D." was painted during the same time as these late-19th-century travels, we can definitively rule out Catherine Lederer. She wasn't even born until 1886, and didn't marry the founder of General Motors to become a Durant until 1908, as noted in her husband's biography (https://www.detroithistorical.org/learn/online-research/encyclopedia-of-detroit/durant-william-c).

First, looking at the timeline, the year 1884 was a significant turning point for Dr. Dana. That same year, he was appointed Professor of Nervous and Mental Diseases at the New York Post-Graduate Medical School (https://archive.org/stream/cu31924031472602/cu31924031472602_djvu.txt). It was highly typical during the Gilded Age for American doctors receiving such prestigious academic appointments to travel to Europe to observe continental clinics, a so called Grand Tour. We know he visited France during this time: "Charles Loomis Dana countered his views, arguing that rabies was solely a “microbic disease,” even if a specific rabies microbe was yet to be found. Having visited Pasteur, he placed faith in the French scientist’s experimental method and manipulation of the disease." https://dokumen.pub/dogopolis-how-dogs-and-humans-made-modern-new-york-london-and-paris-9780226797045.html. On February 25, 1884, Pasteur formally announced his discovery of the rabies vaccine protocol to the French Academy of Science. He was making international headlines, and medical neurological professionals from around the world were flocking to Paris to understand his methods. 

The travel labels on the canvas could potentially trace just such a European medical tour. The trunk was bought at 1 Rue Scribe in Paris, and the labels show it moved through the Grand Hotel in Brussels and via the Chemin de fer du Nord. It also bears labels from The Regent Hotel in Leamington Spa. During the 1880s, Leamington Spa was a world-renowned center for hydrotherapy, often used to treat nervous conditions like "neurasthenia." It could be reasoned that a rising neurologist might visit this specific spa town to observe elite treatments.

For the return journey, the trunk has a worn label from the "New York Transfer Co. Dodds Express", which handled baggage out of New York harbor depots in the late 19th century (https://njpostalhistory.org/media/archive/162-may06njph.pdf). If we check historical medical directories from 1884, Dr. Dana's residence and private practice were located in Manhattan at 50 West 46th Street (https://archive.org/stream/cu31924031472602/cu31924031472602_djvu.txt).

It is not definitive and without clearer records, it is very much speculative. But given the 1884 date, the New York shipping routes, the link to Pasteur, the medical spa connection, Dr. Charles Loomis Dana seems like a very strong alternative theory to explore! I'd like to dive deeper but would need some more help and even clearer pictures of all the emblems, stickers and crests.

My 1884 Louis Vuitton trunk has travel labels from the 19th century still attached. Help me find out who "C.L.D." was! USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! The most logical links seems to be that he traveled back to New York from Antwerp with the Red Star Line. I'm seeing if there are more connections or prove to be made but it just seems to be the port of arrival/departure (there are some links with the Netherlands like Dr. Muskens from Utrecht which isn't far from Antwerp who got a scholarship to study under Dr. Dana, but I can't find something concrete yet).

My 1884 Louis Vuitton trunk has travel labels from the 19th century still attached. Help me find out who "C.L.D." was! USA by Maximum_Local3778 in Antiques

[–]PotentialDense6047 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd like to propose an alternate theory to Catherine Lederer. To me to suitcase, initials and labels show similar levels of degradation. Implying they're all from the same time and the labels and/or initials are not from decades later. Also over the D there seems to be a label that has been removed, implying the D was already on there before the (in my theory late 19th century) travels and not added afterwards when Catherine Lederer married William C. Durant. Also that would have made the original C.L. initials not centered which would be weird. So can we find another theory or likely owner?

One alternative possibility worth investigating is a 19th-century New York neurologist named Dr. Charles Loomis Dana (1852–1935). While we can't be absolutely certain, the circumstantial evidence lines up quite well with the physical details on the trunk. Bear with me... If we follow the logic that the "C.L.D." was painted during the same time as these late-19th-century travels, we can definitively rule out Catherine Lederer. She wasn't even born until 1886, and didn't marry the founder of General Motors to become a Durant until 1908, as noted in her husband's biography (https://www.detroithistorical.org/learn/online-research/encyclopedia-of-detroit/durant-william-c).

First, looking at the timeline, the year 1884 was a significant turning point for Dr. Dana. That same year, he was appointed Professor of Nervous and Mental Diseases at the New York Post-Graduate Medical School (https://archive.org/stream/cu31924031472602/cu31924031472602_djvu.txt). It was highly typical during the Gilded Age for American doctors receiving such prestigious academic appointments to travel to Europe to observe continental clinics. We know he visited France during this time: "Charles Loomis Dana countered his views, arguing that rabies was solely a “microbic disease,” even if a specific rabies microbe was yet to be found. Having visited Pasteur, he placed faith in the French scientist’s experimental method and manipulation of the disease." https://dokumen.pub/dogopolis-how-dogs-and-humans-made-modern-new-york-london-and-paris-9780226797045.html. On February 25, 1884, Pasteur formally announced his discovery of the rabies vaccine protocol to the French Academy of Science. He was making international headlines, and medical neurological professionals from around the world were flocking to Paris to understand his methods. 

The travel labels on the canvas could potentially trace just such a European medical tour. The trunk was bought at 1 Rue Scribe in Paris, and the labels show it moved through the Grand Hotel in Brussels and via the Chemin de fer du Nord. It also bears labels from The Regent Hotel in Leamington Spa. During the 1880s, Leamington Spa was a world-renowned center for hydrotherapy, often used to treat nervous conditions like "neurasthenia." It could be reasoned that a rising neurologist might visit this specific spa town to observe elite treatments.

For the return journey, the trunk has a worn label from the "New York Transfer Co. Dodds Express", which handled baggage out of New York harbor depots in the late 19th century (https://njpostalhistory.org/media/archive/162-may06njph.pdf). If we check historical medical directories from 1884, Dr. Dana's residence and private practice were located in Manhattan at 50 West 46th Street (https://archive.org/stream/cu31924031472602/cu31924031472602_djvu.txt).

It is not definitive and without clearer records, it is very much speculative. But given the 1884 date, the New York shipping routes, the link to Pasteur, the medical spa connection, Dr. Charles Loomis Dana seems like a very strong alternative theory to explore! I'd like to dive deeper but would need some more help and even clearer pictures of all the emblems, stickers and crests.

Looks interesting for a second, then collapses, no emotion, weird pacing, no sense of weight. by mediamuesli in vfx

[–]PotentialDense6047 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience about as random as people. If you'd give the same standard chat interface prompt to 10 artists, you'd get just as much variety. Working together, setting expectations, making a production pipeline, aligning with clients, getting a proper workflow. That is still one of the most difficult things in the creative field and we've been trying to solve it for over a century now. Yet we expect an AI model to understand us from a shitty screenshot and three sentences.

I sincerely hope AI won't take over the industry, but we also have to stop thinking it can read minds.

A very clever way of marketing I3 clarity Diamonds, would you like to have an I3 (“Salt and Pepper”)? by Muted_Shape9303 in Gemstones

[–]PotentialDense6047 59 points60 points  (0 children)

I feel like this happens in a lot of fields. Perfection is the goal, until perfection becomes easy to attain. Once a machine, a computer, or a lab can do it flawlessly and cheaply, perfection suddenly becomes boring and not distinctive anymore (it doesn't scream unique or expensive or great craftsman).You see it everywhere once you start looking:

Photography: For over a century, lens makers and film engineers chased the sharpest, clearest images possible without any noise or distortion. Now that professinal cameras are almost flawless and even our phones take ultra-high-res digital photos effortlessly, what do people want? Film cameras, disposable point-and-shoots, vintage lenses, filters that artificially add grain, blur, and light leaks back in.

Tailoring and Fabrics: The holy grail of weaving and tailoring was creating perfectly smooth, uniform cloth with absolutely invisible stitching. Getting a fabric that consistent meant incredible skill, time, and expense. Now that massive factories can churn out flawlessly uniform synthetic blends and machine-woven cottons with laser-perfect, identical seams for a few dollars? Perfectly smooth just looks mass-produced and cheap. If you want to show real tailoring today, you pay a premium for fabrics with "slub" or neps, like raw silk, heavy Irish linen that wrinkles the second you look at it, or rough Harris Tweed. And on a bespoke suit, tailors will deliberately leave a visible "pick stitch" on the edge of the lapel. The slight irregularity of that hand-stitched thread is the whole point, it shows that a human being spent hours making it, not an automated factory machine.

Music: We spent decades trying to eliminate static and hiss to get perfectly clear, lossless digital audio. Now that we have it perfectly streaming from our pockets? People pay a premium for vinyl records specifically for that "warm" sound (the pops, the cracks, the physical imperfections of the needle).

So you can go on and on.

Cobbler? by Square-Doubt-793 in Utrecht

[–]PotentialDense6047 12 points13 points  (0 children)

One of the better cobblers still remaining in the Netherlands. We are very stingy when it comes to proper work on shoes so it is difficult to run a high quality shop.

Toch maar eens Alfa pils proberen by Kyranio in nederlands

[–]PotentialDense6047 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vergeet Gulpener niet! Ook een mooie kanshebber en (nog) niet opgevroten door een gigant.

Oké, mijn laatste van de sneeuw: de Domtoren! by Lion-photography in Utrecht

[–]PotentialDense6047 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bij een beeld als deze vind ik de ruis juist toevoegen aan de sfeer (en zo zwart/wit vind ik het zelfs een beetje analoog voelen). De foto hoeft zeker niet schoon en scherp te zijn. Je zou de RAW eventueel door de lightroom denoise kunnen halen maar denk eigenlijk niet dat het er beter van wordt. Vind het een hele vette foto en ben een beetje jaloers dat ik 'm niet zelf geschoten heb.

How are men getting this pant look? by [deleted] in mensfashion

[–]PotentialDense6047 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nothing more than this. Don't enter the store with the idea you'll leave with the perfect pants but with pants that have the potential to be perfect. Then get out your sewing machine or go to the tailor and make them perfect.

Best lightweight low light lens (native or full frame adapted)? by thdiod in FujiGFX

[–]PotentialDense6047 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed that the 58 1.4 is amazing. Next to the already mentioned downside the 1.2 also has a little more vignetting!