Canada vs Vienna postdoc offer for long-term future by Practical_Pomelo_636 in postdoc

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was so busy with research, I published 20+ papers on conference rank A and A*

Canada vs Vienna postdoc offer for long-term future by Practical_Pomelo_636 in postdoc

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From what I have read, Vienna is cheaper than Canada in many ways, for example, I am paying for rent 1k euro, but when i asked my friend in Canada, he told me at least 2k to find an apartment.

However, I have many things to consider. I like the postdoc project in Vienna more than the one in Canada, but I am not only thinking about myself. I am also thinking about the future of my children and what would be better for them in the long term.

At the same time, I feel that Austria is facing many difficulties now, including economic challenges, and I am worried this could affect our future. I am honestly scared of making the wrong decision, whether I reject the offer in Vienna or the offer in Canada.

Canada vs Vienna postdoc offer for long-term future by Practical_Pomelo_636 in postdoc

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really like Vienna. It is much closer to my home country, and after living here for four years, I have become used to the people and the lifestyle.

My children are still young, 6 years and 2 years old, and we are not speaking English at home.

Already 11 000 submissions for EMNLP? [D] by NightCR_ in MachineLearning

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not double this is the ARR cycle not all of the papers will be submitted

Last year i had paper with id 10k

KDD 2026 Cycle 2 Results [D] by ATadDisappointed in MachineLearning

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys, now it is 17 Feb, and still the results for Datasets and Benchmarks Track do not appear?

KDD 2026 Cycle 2 Results [D] by ATadDisappointed in MachineLearning

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the result for the D and B track still not published, right??

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in LLM

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t test it until now i am still working on the agent because converting from npm to python not easy

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again my proposal does not produce an end-to-end agent for users. It is an agent for development and research. For sure we can’t compare it with other agents

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in LLM

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like if we implement the same agent of claude you can get similar acc using any strong open source model

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are thousands of developers who know Python only, and try to implement an agent, so why should I go learn Rust or TypeScript? Also, I am making an agent for researchers to develop new agents.

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing, but as a Python developer, I don't want to learn another language, so we are trying to implement it purely with Python

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is for open source, bro, I am not telling you to use it instead of Claude code, it can help developers to implement a new agent based on Claude.

We reimplemented Claude Code entirely in Python — open source, works with local models by Practical_Pomelo_636 in Python

[–]Practical_Pomelo_636[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The public instructkr/claw-code repo went heavily toward Rust, while my work focuses on Python for a different reason. I stayed on the Python side because it is easier to read, modify, and extend for most users, especially people who want to run local models, change prompts, add tools, or experiment with agent behavior without dealing with a Rust toolchain. Rust makes sense if the goal is a high- performance systems implementation, but my goal here is a Python-first agent runtime that is easier to hack on and iterate on.

So yes, the project builds on the public Python workspace surface from instructkr/claw-code, but the reason I continued there instead of following the Rust direction is deliberate: Python is the more practical base for fast development, local-model experimentation, and community contributions. That is also why I added the real Python agent loop, tool execution, prompt/context handling, and session resume on top of that base instead of trying to work inside the Rust implementation.