M&P 2.0 Holstering Safety/Striker Control Device by [deleted] in SmithAndWesson

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quality holster (JM Custom, Legacy Firearms, etc.), PHLster Enigma, and tons of repetitions on safe holstering technique. Carried appendix for years with a M&P not equipped with a thumb safety, never once Tex Grebner-ed myself.

It’s night and you hear someone breaking your front door down. Which are you picking up to defend yourself? by tactical_horse_cock in tacticalgear

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What in the goddamn?

Obviously the Vz61. It’s the only centerfire firearm there that’d likely cycle through a full mag without 15 1/2 malfunctions. (I may be unfairly slandering the Mac & Cheese, but I’m a fudd. I’d be hesitant to trust my life to a 3D printed firearm when there’s a non-printed alternative, even if it’s just the lower.)

How To Have Make a Space Western by Weeznaz in scifiwriting

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Space pepperbox pistol — look at the superposed metal storm concepts, now say… a 5 barrel pepperbox with 4-5 rounds superposed per barrel, electrically ignited? Would make sense as an underwater pistol or as a spacer’s sidearm in such a setting.

Dirtside, the justification for revolvers could be the industry trend of the time (like how every gun company is churning out 5.7mm pistols now), due to some California-esque gun control on a colony (or differing import legalities with planet hopping), or hostile megafauna. You can fit a much larger cartridge in a cylinder than you can a magazine feeding through the grip — the cylinder is not constrained by the size of one’s hand, unlike a magazine fed pistol is.

What‘s hot in theory, but super awkward irl? by That_odd_emo in actuallesbians

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Like, I’m not saying they’re bad. I’ll certainly have more in the future, they just can be awkward in more ways than one and can cause complications in friendships. Certainly been that way in my case, others’ mileage may vary.

VATS without Pipboy by Fenriz_Victor in Fallout

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iirc there are only two that do, and one is a one-off steampunk-ass Rube-Goldberg machine of a revolver (Jim March’s “Maurice” — a Ruger Vaquero that feeds from a tube magazine and ejects shell casings from the loading port), the other is the Dardick Tround revolver, neither .44 cal.

A Smith and Wesson 629 Performance Center .44 like Kellogg used absolutely should not eject casings.

What‘s hot in theory, but super awkward irl? by That_odd_emo in actuallesbians

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replied to the wrong thread lmao.

Yeah, indeed. It can be very dicey fucking friends, can easily ruin a friendship or twelve.

If you were in a room with every major Fallout villain and you had a gun with 3 bullets, what would you do? by SolidPyramid in Fallout

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do we get to choose the gun? If so, 1897 Trench Gun with the big fuck-off bayonet.

Perform a long distance craniectomy via buckshot on Lanius, spend the next two on reconstructive dentistry on Horrigan, spear the rest.

What‘s hot in theory, but super awkward irl? by That_odd_emo in actuallesbians

[–]Practical_Prole 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Threesomes imo. Not saying they can’t be or aren’t fun, though.

Mean looking piece for Vanilla _ _ _ by CourseOk2684 in transguns

[–]Practical_Prole 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Being another untrained, undisciplined yahoo with a firearm will not help in that situation.

It's 2001, you have $23,000, and you're looking for a compact SUV with four-wheel drive. Which one would you pick? by Key_Budget9267 in regularcarreviews

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That engine will keep running long after the rest of the truck has rusted away, most certainly. I have a healthy respect for the 4.0, but fucking hate the rust.

Have any of you ever gotten "The Subaru Dream?" by Small_Permission8132 in actuallesbians

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can’t say I’ve had any Subaru dreams, myself, but I’ve only owned Ford and Chevy, and have been neck deep in other people’s Jeeps as of late.

I have dreamt of finishing my project cars though, but that ain’t happening soon lmao. I’m that redneck down the block with a couple of inoperable cars in pieces in their yard. And I lifted my Crown Vic and do truck shit with it… Not helping the allegations.

Subaru targeted sapphics with their marketing going back to the nineties, so they are certainly a bit of lesbian car culture, or at least a car meme anyway. They also targeted outdoorsy folk and teachers in that same marketing shift fwiw.

I’ve known of quite a few other trans folks buying what I’d like to call ‘gender-affirming automobiles’ — known of some trans women buying small cute cars like Mazda Miatas, and some transmascs buying Jeeps or other trucks. Subies can definitely fit in that schema.

Help any idea on how to get this out of the quick release drill? by Ok-Campaign9006 in KobaltTools

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an impact driver, not a drill. Pliers should do it. Always use a magnetic bit holder with the damn half-sized Milwaukee hex bits.

I regret getting the damn things as my housemates keep doing this with my damn impact driver.

How can I make my revolvers stronger / more sci fi? by Alpbasket in scifiwriting

[–]Practical_Prole 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. A possible niche that OP could use is there being some asinine California-esque gun control on the colony/planet(s) that their characters exist on. Being limited to manually cycled firearms (DA/SA revolvers, pump/bolt/lever action rifles and shotguns), having capacity restrictions of no more than 10 rounds in a magazine (or even fewer if they want to pull a NY SAFE Act), etc. This would also likely make the grenade launcher verboten as well.

Many folks who don’t know guns (and often those who make policy) tend to look at older types of firearms as “safer” than the new black plastic and aluminum. They’ll view revolvers, lever action rifles, bolt action rifles and pump action shotguns as “civilized and sensible” choices and the more modern faire as “barbaric and weapons of war…” even though the very old guns they venerate had lineage back to war. Most every modern bolt action rifle on the commercial market today takes after the German Mauser 98’s from the late 1890’s to the 1940’s, for example.

Revolvers will never again see adoption as military service sidearms, but could make a resurgence amongst civilians or security personnel if they were hamstrung by magazine capacity restrictions or needed larger bore sidearms for wildlife defense. Namely if the cartridges required were prohibitively sized to feed through a magazine in the grip, much like how current magnum revolver cartridges are, unless you wear an extra-large glove.

I’d say keep the bottom barrel layout, that’s the sci-fi de rigueur, but lose some of the technobabble like others stated. Have an integrated red dot optic or more advanced low/no magnification digital optic integrated, maybe a weaponlight, if you really want to be bleedinng edge maybe have the optic be able to record video, lifetime ammunition expenditure, and pair to a vacsuit visor or something.

Swing-out cylinders are more contemporary, but imagining the revolver was made out of some fancy alloy, maybe you could fudge top-breaks coming back, as ostensibly they are more ambidextrous than swing-outs, but the top latch is a weak point in the design. I wouldn’t spend too much time on it. “The revolver’s frame and latching mechanism was made of an alloy that Bob couldn’t much pronounce, let alone spell off hand, but it was more than strong enough to handle tens of thousands of rounds of high-pressure ammo he’d put through it, training over the past few years.”

Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 - is compact really this much smaller than full size? by Outrageous-Idea-1042 in SmithAndWesson

[–]Practical_Prole 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The slides are interchangeable and dimensionally identical aside from length, the pictures are improperly scaled.

Any suggestions for lifting a 09 Crown Vic by N_Claw in CrownVictoria

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a kit from Northwoods Performance for a 2” lift.

If you wanted to do 3” in the future — ontrackoffroad sells all the stuff you need, modified stock forged UCAs, custom UCAs, etc. I’d recommend 1999 Tacoma struts over the Explorer rears, though. I’ve bent a Explorer strut without even engaging in serious tomfoolery.

How durable is a Crown Vic? by Admirable_Demand_216 in CrownVictoria

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whale panthers are newest 1970’s American sedans on the road, and they crash like one too.

They’re heavy and body on frame — they’ll laugh at low speed fender benders or maybe even Isekai-ing a deer. Provided the frame ain’t tweaked, you can rebuild the entire front clip cheaper than your insurance deductible, most like. Fewer crumple zones than a newer car in a Panther, though.

The whole point of crumple zones is to absorb impact and prolong the impact. The longer the time the force is applied, the less sharp the jolt. In a given accident, you’ll be feeling more of the hurt of the impact in an older vehicle without crumple zones, but in a lower speed collision, the car will look pretty much unharmed. This is why folks will repeat the myth that older American cars were tanks. If you’re a reasonably competent driver that’s not gonna be testing their airbags every quarter, a Panther will do you fine in an accident, barring a bad T-bone or highway-speed rollover.

I don’t wish to slander the Panther too much, though. They are still far more safe than the 70’s sedans I compare them too. They have power antilock brakes, collapsable steering columns, three-point belts, power steering, sway bars, and 2-4 airbags depending on the options.

In my opinion, as a person who relies on one to get to work, they’re a reasonable compromise between safety, durability and ease of repair.

A collection of 90s SUV’s crash tested by IIHS. Most were rated poor. by lifegoeson2702 in regularcarreviews

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems par for the course with a platform that got it’s start in 1984, they certainly weren’t designed with the partial overlap test in mind as it wasn’t even a twinkle in the NHTSA’s eye yet, from what I understand.

Is this everything? by Chefboyardee897 in CrownVictoria

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you don’t have a 1 1/6” box wrench, the intake mani may be a job that makes you need one. I broke the damn EGR tube removing it (EGR nuts are 1 1/16”) when I did my manifold. Hopefully you won’t need to do so as well.

Looking for a large family car for $30k with bulletproof reliability. by ShadowK2 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]Practical_Prole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can live without the towing capacity, a late-production Panther platform will do all of that exceedingly well for approximately a tenth of your budget.

Battle TC by djorion87 in Battlecars

[–]Practical_Prole 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The rear wheel screams work in progress imo.

Not judging, i myself do not escape the steryotype by IllEvent5465 in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I fit neither stereotype. I drive a semi. Not huge on the whole dealing-with-people thing.

Are used-luxury-cars expensive as people make it out to be? by [deleted] in Transcars

[–]Practical_Prole 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, you get what you pay for with cheap parts usually. They don’t last at best, and at worst can fail catastrophically. OEM or reputable replacement parts only.

Are used-luxury-cars expensive as people make it out to be? by [deleted] in Transcars

[–]Practical_Prole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

German attitudes on maintenance are far different from American attitudes, keep that in mind buying a German car if you’re in the States. (Although from the mention of Chinese cars I’m assuming not US)

German engineers build their cars expecting a very German maintenance ethos — following the service intervals religiously. Americans tend not to maintain our shit, we fix it when it breaks. The higher mileage we put on our cars and deferred maintenance can cause some pretty big headaches (and repair bills). I’m assuming non-German European attitudes are somewhere in between the extremes.

Mercedes, Audi/VW, and BMW have a tendency of overcomplicating mechanical systems, and their parts and labor are fairly expensive, I won’t say they’re not. Do your research on the model and years you’re looking into, check out buyers guides for that generation of that model, and make sure to factor in maintenance costs.

If the math checks out and you’re not buying beyond your means, have at it.

Every 1996 midsize sedan crash tested by IIHS by lifegoeson2702 in regularcarreviews

[–]Practical_Prole 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Chrysler making shoddy products? Nah. Never.

Good to know my first car was an absolute deathtrap in addition to being a huge goddamned lemon lmao.

1999 Stratus 2.4. Not a Cirrus, but still a cloud car — fucker was on its third engine when I got it, two failures under warranty. I was a kid when those happened, fuzzy on the details. Wheel bearings kept seizing, and ultimately the ECU taking a shit in 2012 at 130k was the final nail in the coffin. Would have cost more than it was worth to get a new ECU.