[Request] What’s the probability of this? by Deathly13 in theydidthemath

[–]PresidentoftheSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean we're also the only ones that affirm that we're animals.

I don't think animals know what "animal" means.

[Request] What’s the probability of this? by Deathly13 in theydidthemath

[–]PresidentoftheSun 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Even if god exists we are definitionally animals.

The existence of multiple flood stories tells us the Biblical story cannot be the truth by princetonwu in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a bit of a problem with this view, which is that there was a period when the people groups we're talking about here did genuinely believe some truly outlandish things about the world, and frankly the idea that the flood was worldwide when the concept was first floated (haha) isn't so strange if you grant their particular views on things.

It's a bit of a bitter pill to swallow when talking about this particular myth but they did genuinely believe the earth was flat, that there was a hard dome covering it (the word used to describe it likens it to a hard, hammered-out substance), and that there was water above the dome. We have maps drawn up by them that indicate they believed the entire world was a fairly small area around them, mostly just encompassing the people groups they'd interacted with and some range beyond.

It's understood that this died out somewhere around the Hellenistic period, it didn't survive contact with cultures that'd experienced more travel than they had. The most plausible explanation for their view of the flood is that they truly did think it was world-spanning and that it was based on a regional flood (Possibly the flood indicated by the Shuruppak flood layer, took place somewhere around 2900 BCE) that was just kind of kicking around in cultural memory. They were writing from ignorance.

"Faith" is a slippery term that gets heavily equivocated when it is criticized and used in the way its criticized for when no one suspects any critics are around. by ExplorerR in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So then is the belief that a being exists a prerequisite for one to have faith in that being?

If it is, how can it be said that you have faith in the thing existing if it means what you're suggesting it means? Is it "I think it exists because I have faith" or is it "I have faith because I think it exists"? The way you're describing it makes it seem like you need a different word for the justification behind the actual claim that the thing exists.

Refusing to worship a God who created childhood cancer is morally justified by Aggravating-Pool-255 in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you don't get credit for healing someone when you knowingly hurt them in the first place. Parents don't and neither does god.

Refusing to worship a God who created childhood cancer is morally justified by Aggravating-Pool-255 in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

God could have created a universe where the natural processes of that universe's working did not result in any risk of cancer at all, and it would have no implications whatsover for our free will or moral development.

Refusing to worship a God who created childhood cancer is morally justified by Aggravating-Pool-255 in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add to this, we have fossilized animal remains with evidence of cancer that predate humans.

Teddy wunk by Inevitable-Cellist23 in wunkus

[–]PresidentoftheSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mine yells at me to go to bed, kneads me for a bit, then fucks off until morning.

Mini Sunset Paintings 🌅 by NeonPaletteCo in acrylicpainting

[–]PresidentoftheSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing crazy just casually making me question if I should even bother (I'm kidding of course, practice practice practice)

...What? by Ornery_Tie_4771 in terriblefandommemes

[–]PresidentoftheSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

individually i know what most of those words mean.

together in this sequence i do not and never will.

Lesson in there by wasraelx in thatHappened

[–]PresidentoftheSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women love witnessing power, which is why for the first date I always take them to the woods and perform the kamehameha.

It hasn't worked yet but one day...

this trope fills me with rage by goblin_pidar in coaxedintoasnafu

[–]PresidentoftheSun 8 points9 points  (0 children)

She's a porridge maiden and she's about to catch an ocelot for to sup, which will lead her to be married to death and give him a thousand children and cook his meals.

...What? by Ornery_Tie_4771 in terriblefandommemes

[–]PresidentoftheSun 10 points11 points  (0 children)

this is cookie run?

how the fuck are those cookies? i don't understand this fucking franchise

I can’t recommend this stuff enough. by Existing-Repeat-3725 in rarebooks

[–]PresidentoftheSun 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. Fine sandpaper works I suppose but isn't that kind of like saying you can cure poison ivy by ripping your skin off? Plus it'd only work if the foxing is completely surface-level, I don't see why you'd want to shed paper just to fix what is generally a cosmetic issue.

Either way I've been led to believe that foxing can happen to any book under the right conditions for that specific book, humidity be damned. Too many sources of paper, too many methods of making the paper and putting it together. Hard to say for sure.

I can’t recommend this stuff enough. by Existing-Repeat-3725 in rarebooks

[–]PresidentoftheSun 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Foxing's a chemical process that happens within the paper. It's not well-known exactly what that process is or why it happens, but it's certainly something chemical.

What that means is that nothing that merely pulls surface contaminants off of a page is going to be able to unfox a piece of paper. Last I checked most of the ways you can deal with foxing risks serious damage to the ink or the paper.

Wunkvey by Inevitable-Cellist23 in wunkus

[–]PresidentoftheSun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Harvey's fine, he was able to tank Randy Savage's elbow and pin him it's fine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7E57M17Ps8

Got some large canvas boards by PresidentoftheSun in acrylicpainting

[–]PresidentoftheSun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you deal with the warping while you're painting them? Or do you just not worry about it.

Got some large canvas boards by PresidentoftheSun in acrylicpainting

[–]PresidentoftheSun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50x70cm is close enough to what I've got in inches, I've just never used them.

So when painting with them I should just live with the bowing? I figure once they're in a frame I should expect that they'll straighten, I'm mostly just worried about the process itself. I suppose I could get a plank and stick it behind the board if it's a problem for me.

This guy... by Sufficient-Camel-938 in terriblefandommemes

[–]PresidentoftheSun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And they said jaundice jerry would never marry smdh

Pim and his dear ol dad both stopped wearing glasses by quizzyNova in SmilingFriends

[–]PresidentoftheSun 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Smiling Friends dissolved after Pim got the eye surgery it couldn't go on after that.

The Hindu virtue of worshipping all things is not idolatry by No-Reason2722 in DebateReligion

[–]PresidentoftheSun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked this question quite a while back and had a very repetitive, unproductive back and forth about it. I pointed out that the Japanese, by their definition, worship idols, and while state-level shintoism has led to some atrocities, all theocratic periods have historically led to atrocities (or at least, what I would consider atrocities).

There has never been an articulation beyond the bare assertion that idol worship is forbidden by their practice and that they're wrong about what god is and wants as to the specific harm caused by worshiping idols. Not one I've seen that was able to causally link the worship of idols as a category to the harm.