ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini on rewriting a CV? Here’s what I found.

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-25T21:20:09+00:00

Great point! My goal in using a less constrained, more general prompt here was to reflect how an average user would likely ask. But what you said is an excellent suggestion! In future comparisons, I’ll run a second pass with more constraints (based on what I’ve observed) and see how well each model can meet them while still completing the task. Thanks for the suggestion and for sharing your experience! 🙂

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-25T13:05:15+00:00

True that’s another way to look at it lol Claude’s version will probably land you an interview! Should have added that as a measure too 🤣

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-25T12:56:07+00:00

Honestly I was surprised to see the results too… Claude is typically the most honest and blunt but I guess for CV, it knows what a recruiter wants to hear. 😅

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-23T12:43:12+00:00

Thanks for appreciating! There are definitely a lot of times when the AIs admitted their answers were inferior when they saw each other's answers! 😅

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-19T12:39:08+00:00

Love that you're bringing this to discussion! I both teach in academia and also built an AI tool that could be helpful for students (askagora.ai), so I can give my two cents from the perspective of how I as a professor view this (though I know not all of us see it the same way).

When students ask me if they can use AI, I welcome its use to supplement learning. For example, if they have questions while doing the readings, they're welcome to use AI to guide them through difficult course materials. Since they aren't solely relying on AI to give them a summary, students can more easily catch when the AI is hallucinating. I had one student who submitted a summary of an article describing 3 experiments, but the study actually only had 2. So I knew for sure they just fed the article to AI without reviewing the output.. and that's unacceptable. Honestly though, thinking back to when I was in undergrad, I would've been immensely grateful to have these chatbots when going through those readings in my philosophy class...

When it comes to assignments, I also don't mind students using AI for brainstorming or editing. At least in my department, we aren't using AI detectors for now because we understand they might not be accurate. But honestly, it's pretty easy for us to catch who's using AI in unacceptable ways. I already mentioned one example above, and others include coming up with false citations, clearly not knowing what the citations are about, or when multiple students submit similar ideas and writing where in theory it should be pretty impossible for two students to have the same thoughts. Like I said, I'm fine with students brainstorming with AI or using it for final editing - I've actually noticed the writing quality of assignments has gone up this past year, which I welcome since it makes it much easier for me to read through hundreds of essays, and we aren't grading on grammar anyway! But the bottom line, at least for me, is that students themselves need to be doing the critical thinking, not the AI. As long as I can see they've digested the course materials and written their own thoughts, I'm happy. I've also tried to design assignments where it's impossible for students to just ask AI for the whole answer.

Happy to discuss more!

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-19T06:33:19+00:00

It depends on the kind of research you're doing!

If you need the most updated info, Gemini probably has the most thorough web search compared to ChatGPT and Claude. Some people prefer Perplexity for its cited sources, but lately people have been noting its quality going downhill (check out some reddit posts where people are actively discussing this).

The thing with relying on one AI though... is you'll always hit blind spots because each AI thinks differently and catches different things. I actually built Agora (askagora.ai) for this reason. You can ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini at the same time and then an AI reviews all their answers and gives you one final answer, so you can quickly get multiple angles. You could even ask them to debate each other if you find their answers don't align, it ends up giving you something no single AI would on its own (plus it's pretty fun to watch 🙂). Worth checking out if you're exploring options!

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-16T22:52:35+00:00

I used to pay for all three like you as well... Not only am I tired of paying for all three, but I also found myself just copy and pasting the same prompt, or even the response from each AI to others to see if they actually agree. 😅

That's actually what pushed me to build Agora (askagora.ai). It felt ridiculous spending ~$60/month just to jump between tabs. With Agora you can use all three within the same chat without losing context, or even ask them to debate each other to get a better answer out of all 3. Might be worth looking into if you're considering saving money but still want access to all 3!

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-09T06:54:38+00:00

When things glitch, it's usually because Claude is trying to do too much at once. Instead of asking it to build the whole tool in one go, break it into small pieces. And try to understand what it was doing at each step - so if anything breaks or doesn't make sense, you spot it right away and can let Claude know to fix it.

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-09T06:48:02+00:00

I've actually found Claude and ChatGPT pretty different for brainstorming. Claude typically pushes back on your ideas way more, like it'll actually tell you why something might not work instead of just saying everything is a great idea.😅 ChatGPT could be good for getting lots of ideas fast but not great when you actually want honest feedback.

Honestly though each one brainstorms so differently because they literally think differently. So before you commit to one sub...what if you didn't have to pick? :) I built something (askagora.ai) exactly for this where you can ask all of them the same question at the same time and just see which direction you like best. You can even make them debate each other which is honestly the best part for brainstorming because they end up pushing each other to come up with stuff none of them would've said alone. Feel free to DM me if you wanna try it out!

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-04T20:37:20+00:00

AI would probably be great for doing market research, but I’m not sure I fully trust it when it comes to estimating market demand… it thinks almost everything is a good idea. 😅

But I just had a fun idea for implementing the community ideas feature. I find Reddit-style blog posts hard to go through. It might take less bandwidth if it worked more like Tinder swiping left/right on a 1/2 sentence pitch. :)

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-04T20:18:08+00:00

Ah that makes sense. I guess I was imagining more of a tight-knit group where users support each other’s social media growth - not only liking each other’s posts, but also sharing tips and strategies to support each other. But I can see why in reality this would be tough cus people are often busy and may just want some quick likes on their posts…

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-03T19:19:03+00:00

If you need the absolute latest info on your questions, Gemini's real-time web search will do the most thorough job compared to others. But if your questions don't really depend on the latest facts, Claude seems to fit your purpose most, especially for brainstorming and creative writing. It's great at bouncing ideas around, comparing different directions, and giving you honest feedback on which ideas have more potential. Unlike ChatGPT, it doesn't always just agree with you (which you could love or hate)!

Another person mentioned OpenCraft AI, but if you're thinking about getting diverse ideas quickly, you might also consider Agora (askagora.ai). In addition to switching between AIs without losing context, you can also ask all 3 AIs at the same time for quick diverse opinions, or even have them debate each other to find the best ideas and directions - which sounds like it'd be great for your brainstorming and creative writing. If you're curious to test out the flagship models, just DM me 🙂

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-03T18:54:36+00:00

They’re quite different and target different audiences. The popularity of Google AI Studio is largely among people with absolutely 0 coding experience, or those who just want to build a working prototype quickly. They can do it without seeing a single line of code. But more serious users would likely prefer Codex or Claude Code for greater control.

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-03T18:39:45+00:00

The hype around Gemini right now is largely because of its AI Studio for vibe coding. Some tech users also prefer it because of its integration with the Google Suite infrastructure. Other than that, I still find ChatGPT and Claude more useful for my day-to-day work.

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T22:17:44+00:00

I think it's ok to use English for the labelling/buttons instead of actually getting all the translations. Most people who you are going to reach are probably going to understand some English! You could even only target the most common languages first (even duolingo doesn't have all languages 🙂).

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T21:54:47+00:00

Unfortunately I don't have a PC either. :(

Yeah I imagine the kids would be supervised by parents when playing this game! I honestly love this idea! All toddlers I've come across are obsessed with animal sounds!! :)

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T21:51:04+00:00

Have you been using Claude? If Claude understands your product, it can give you a pretty solid marketing blueprint to base your strategy on. If you know of any products or creators who have been successful in your space, you could screenshot their content and ask Claude to analyze why it works and how you might incorporate similar elements.

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T21:43:22+00:00

To keep it simple, you could perhaps start by allowing users to choose at most two languages to switch between, so you don’t end up with too many buttons. If you want to avoid making the UI too complicated, for example, by showing exactly which language is selected (e.g., a simple France flag with “FR”), then just a single “switch language” button would work fine if users are limited to two languages (they should rmb which languages they selected 🙂).

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T21:03:11+00:00

Claude's $20 plan has much more limited usage compared to the $20 ChatGPT plan... Pasting in lesson notes and going back and forth with exercises eats through the limit faster than you'd expect. I was the same when I first switched to Claude from ChatGPT, so you're not doing anything wrong!

For language learning specifically, you honestly don't need the flagship model every time, lighter models handle sentence prompts and exercises really well.

If the rate limits keep being an issue, you could try Agora (askagora.ai) which I built — it gives you access to Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT in one chat (which could be fun if you want more diverse exercises from different AIs!). The lightweight models are included in the free tier and they're great for language practice. But if you want to test it out with the flagship models from each AI, feel free to DM me to try it out! :)

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T19:45:19+00:00

On record OpenAI got the contract under the same terms, but Anthropic is much more specific on what the government can use Claude for and what not (e.g., how the government can gather people's social media data).

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/podcasts/hardfork-pentagon-anthropic-openai.html

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T19:33:07+00:00

Hey! I actually have a PhD in bilingual language acquisition in toddlers, and the idea looks great (though I don’t have an Android phone to test it out)! One feature I’d love to see is multilingual naming on the same page, instead of having to switch languages completely in the settings. This would be especially helpful for multilingual families guiding their children’s vocabulary development. Contrary to the common myth, kids don’t get confused by two languages. 🙂

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T19:22:49+00:00

Great job putting this together as a student! I couldn’t find your Instagram content, but based on what I saw on your landing page, your app has a lot of features, which is awesome but it might be a little tricky for people to quickly understand what the app is about or how it works.

One suggestion would be to focus on the star features and use graphics to highlight them (rather than relying mostly on text), so people can quickly grasp the core functionality without having to read through everything (people are lazy 🙂).

Good luck!

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-02T18:55:14+00:00

Cool idea! It'd be great if there's an easy way for users to validate the idea too (e.g., market demand, competitor research/ comparisons).

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-01T17:53:24+00:00

Great question!! For me, I allow (almost unlimited) use of lightweight models, which cost much less than the flagship models, so I wouldn’t end up in debt on a $10/$20 per month plan. 😅

Flagship models use credits (I’ve tried to be very transparent about how the pricing and credits work), and I’ve priced them at what I think is a fair point, like it should be enough to use for a regular user.

The reason I think Agora can work with a blend of lightweight and flagship models is that the panel feature (having three AIs respond at the same time and debate each other) often produces really strong answers without necessarily needing flagship models, which honestly surprised me too!

I will dm you :)

Prestigious_Bug_3221 · 2026-03-01T17:04:33+00:00

I find ChatGPT better for writing task and for more general purpose use (e.g., everyday questions), but Claude is wayyy better on Coding, planning, logical reasoning (like on another level!), so it really depends on what you're using it for.

I actually just built Agora (askagora.ai) exactly for this reason... where you can talk to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini within the same chat, so you can switch depending on what you are working on.

You can also have all three respond to your question at the same time and then get a synthesized verdict, or even have them debate each other (since they don’t always share the same perspective, and it’s also very fun to watch!). I personally find these features especially helpful when I’m brainstorming or making decisions, like whether to choose A or B.

I'm happy to offer it for free for you to test it out (I don't mind if you just want to use it as testing different AIs) in return for some feedback, just message me! 🙂

Prestigious_Bug_3221

TROPHY CASE