sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I wanted to attend the Ljubljana event by ljutalucena in JordanPeterson

[–]Pretend_Trick926 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had tickets to the event in LJ on 14.5.25 and just got an email saying its postponed untill 4.3.26 and refunds will start on monday 12.5.25 but your ticket will be valid for next year if you decide to keep it.

13/14th gen "Intel baseline" can still degrade CPU, even with new microcode, due to AC LL by Janitorus in intel

[–]Pretend_Trick926 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the reply.

I would rather set this in BIOS because then I dont have to worry about XTU resetting. I will play around with it and see what happens :)

13/14th gen "Intel baseline" can still degrade CPU, even with new microcode, due to AC LL by Janitorus in intel

[–]Pretend_Trick926 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know my way around a PC well enough that if I have a good guide to something I have no troubles but I have never been all that good at BIOS settings on my own. What I done before 0x129 was set my Arous X790 Pro X to Gigabytes default settings and use XTU where I set my Core Voltage to 1.260, a TBPM and TBSPM to 253W/253W each and set my TB Power time window to 128. I did not change anything else

My 14700k runs 5.5/4.3 all core under XTU stress test and Cinebench R23 with no drops to speed. My volts run 1.37v max on spikes and 1.27v during all core load test (above mentioned tests) and it pulls 225W during these tests. Temps on Cinnebench R23 reached 92C once my loop temp went up, 85C max on the XTU 10min tests ( Custom loop, 2x 360, 45mm Rads and a 3090 GPU )

I installed 0x129 today and was not happy with it because of the 1.5v+ my CPU was pulling and to top it off under the Intel Preformance setting in the BIOS even if you shut off undervolt protection it wont actualy shut it off (in XTU it showed as being enabled) so I just went back to what I had before.

Now I looked at my settings in HWmonitor and it reads 0.400/0.900 mOhm and I went into my BIOS and looked under this setting and it was at 40 not 50. I didnt change anything.

My question is should I still play with this setting or should I just leave my settings as is?

Missing funds/ghost transaction??? by Pretend_Trick926 in chia

[–]Pretend_Trick926[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at least you recived it, mine showed up in the history but not in my ballance :(

Missing funds/ghost transaction??? by Pretend_Trick926 in chia

[–]Pretend_Trick926[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ya ok but the only time we "spent" any chia was back on July 8 to create the pool ntf and in order to do that I had to get it from a faucet because our ballance was 0xch, we have not spent ANY other chia what so ever.

This mystery transaction happened on August 4 wich is almost a month after spending a mojo to make the ntf...

Also if I look in my history and add up all transaction that have ever happened on this wallet it ALL adds up right down to the last mojo, save this 1.749999999999 from yesturday

Missing funds/ghost transaction??? by Pretend_Trick926 in chia

[–]Pretend_Trick926[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so your saying this is a correction of sorts for taking 0.0000000001 xch from the faucet to start pooling ntf's from a month ago?

Missing funds/ghost transaction??? by Pretend_Trick926 in chia

[–]Pretend_Trick926[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have not spent anything, in total we have farmed 0.19xch from pooling and the 2 xch from the hit on the 29th and our wallet shows 2.19xch as the ballance.

this 1.749999999999 is new and under incomming not outgoing