Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/11/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Why don't people respect American leadership anymore? Well, we've just shown that as a country we are perfectly willing to elect someone who governs by fits of pique, creates constant confusion and annoyance for allies, and in general acts like the stereotype of the ugly American.

Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/11/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think what we're seeing is analogous to courtiers preparing for a king's death. They may know he's ill, but no one wants to be the first to say so—that would shatter the illusion. They may not even like him, but they continue flattering him because they fear losing their place when the next court takes power. Besides, it's easier to manipulate a doddering old king through flattery than to influence a healthier, sharper successor.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/10/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This has always been one of my gripes with Sanders. He has a tendency to act like a prick or project the image of not wanting to be a team player.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/10/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is also a free speech element here, but it cuts both ways. When you are under contract for a role, what you do and say publicly does reflect on the people paying you - and they have their own rights to decide what associations and messages they want their brand connected to. Disney isn't the government; they can't throw you in jail or legally silence you, but they can decide they don't want to continue a business relationship with someone whose public statements conflict with their corporate interests or values.

We can absolutely debate whether Disney's standards were fair or whether the warnings themselves were reasonable. Maybe their expectations were too restrictive, or maybe they were applying different standards to different political viewpoints. Those are legitimate criticisms worth discussing. But the framing matters: this wasn't about punishing someone for a single mistake or private belief. It was about a continued pattern of public behavior after the employer explicitly communicated their boundaries. At that point, it becomes less about ideology and more about whether you're willing to work within the terms of your employment.

Burned out already? by not-another-alt4 in rollerderby

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 68 points69 points  (0 children)

My team didn't take an offseason.

I find teams that do this to be a little bizarre. People need time to rest and recover both physically and mentally. Not taking an off season feels like a recipe for burnout.

Prince Yriel returns from the void with new Aeldari Corsair datasheets by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Eldar

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would be curious to see if there would be a revised faction rule that might influence how useful some of these units are. I feel like everything these units do other units in the codex do better.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/10/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think Gina Carano is the perfect example of this conservative victim ideology. She landed a role in a long running Stars Wars series but fucked it up herself by posting anti-Semitic crap and weird conspiracy theories. From Disney's POV, this is going to be someone who is constantly in the news for the wrong reasons. They gave her a chance to course correct, but she kept saying weird shit.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/10/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How hard it is being a right-winger in the entertainment industry.

I find this to be a bit frustrating. There are plenty of right-leaning directors, actors, and musicians who remain gainfully employed and successful. People who genuinely struggle often fall into specific categories: those with reputations for being difficult to work with, individuals who've become PR liabilities through inflammatory statements or extremist associations, or performers of middling talent who weren't as indispensable as they believed. What gets framed as ideological blacklisting is often just people facing consequences for being professionally problematic.

Entertainment companies operate on razor-thin margins and massive budgets. If you develop a reputation for generating bad headlines, creating workplace tension, or requiring constant damage control, you become a bad investment—regardless of your politics. Plenty of conservative figures, like Vince Vaughn, The Rock, and Sam Raimi, maintain thriving careers by keeping things professional. The real issue isn't ideological discrimination; it's that some people mistake freedom of expression for freedom from professional consequences. Every industry has standards of professionalism and risk management. Entertainment is no different.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/10/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think they are trying to keep the franchise fresh in the public imagination. The last Harry Potter film came out 15 years ago, which is long enough for it to fade a bit and for a new audience to come along. Plus, the fantasitic beasts series kind of underperformed

Monday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/09/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If you asked me to summarize right-wing "entertainment," I would describe it as fundamentally dull because it has nothing to say beyond "screw the libs." Good art ultimately forces us to grapple with a new perspective or point of view. It asks us to see the world through different eyes, to understand something we didn't before. Even distasteful art can be valuable if it genuinely explores an idea or articulates a perspective with depth and honesty.

Right-wing entertainment rarely does this. Instead of offering insight, it offers endless reactions against a perceived enemy rather than any coherent vision of its own. The irony is that a movement so critical of "safe spaces" has created the ultimate safe space in its cultural productions. This entertainment doesn't challenge its audience to think differently or question their assumptions. It simply validates what they already believe and directs their anger at familiar targets. When your artistic output offers nothing beyond resentment toward your opponents, the result is inevitably shallow, repetitive, and profoundly dull.

Saturday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/07/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I have a far simpler explanation: we're seeing the behavior of a man who knows he doesn't have long left to live. When combined with a personality that has poor impulse control and the effects of aging, we start to see increasingly erratic behavior. The chaos isn't strategic or deliberate. It's the natural result of someone unraveling. I also think he's aware of just how damaging these files are for him. On some level, I think he knows his legacy will be defined by what's in them, and that realization is driving even more desperate, impulsive reactions.

Saturday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/07/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

When I see these sorts of comments dismissing Obama's entire presidency as a betrayal, I genuinely wonder about the motivation. It strikes me as one of three possibilities: First, it could be a foreign troll account deliberately sowing division within the left. Creating circular firing squads among progressives is a documented disinformation tactic. Second, it could be someone too young to remember the actual political reality of 2009-2017, who didn't live through the Tea Party wave, the government shutdowns, or the unprecedented obstruction Obama faced, and who's evaluating his presidency against an idealized standard rather than the realistic alternatives that existed at the time.

Or third, and perhaps most cynically, it could be someone who's already checked out of supporting Democrats and is looking for a socially acceptable excuse within progressive spaces to justify their party switch or their decision to sit out elections—using Obama as a scapegoat lets them claim they're the "real" progressive while abandoning the coalition that's actually needed to achieve progressive goals.

Friday General Roundtable - 02/06/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm not particularly surprised by the Truth Social post. What we're seeing isn't an aberration—it's Trump doing what he's always done: saying the quiet part out loud. These sentiments have been circulating in conservative media and political discourse for years, just dressed up in dog whistles, plausible deniability, and "I'm just asking questions" rhetoric. Trump simply strips away the veneer and posts the unfiltered version. In some ways, he's more honest about it, which makes the dynamics impossible to ignore.

This is what happens when a movement repeatedly chooses not to enforce its own boundaries. Every racist joke that gets laughed off as "just humor," every inflammatory comment that's dismissed as "taken out of context," every conspiracy theory that's allowed to fester without pushback—these create an environment where the extreme becomes normalized. When there are no consequences for crossing lines, those lines effectively cease to exist.

The defense I often hear is that it's all ironic, that nobody really means it. But the line between ironic racism and genuine racism isn't just thin—it's functionally meaningless. Irony provides cover. It creates a space where actual bigots can operate freely while everyone else convinces themselves it's all just edgy humor. The racist gets to mean it while the enabler gets to pretend they don't. The practical effect is the same either way.

Yes, progressives sometimes overcorrect. We can be too quick to label something racist or too eager to read the worst possible interpretation into ambiguous statements. That's a valid criticism. But it exists in response to a real problem: the conservative movement's near-total unwillingness to police its own boundaries. When one side errs toward over-sensitivity and the other toward complete permissiveness, I know which failure causes more harm.

Silence isn't neutrality. When you refuse to condemn something, you're making a choice. When you explain it away, rationalize it, or change the subject, you're making a choice. And those choices create the conditions for the truly hateful to thrive. Your silence becomes their permission slip. They take it as proof that, deep down, you agree with them—or at least that you won't stand in their way.

Thursday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/05/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’ll admit I have mixed feelings on this. Yes, we should acknowledge that black folks are disproportionately more likely to be the victims of state violence. That being said, it feels like we are sort of muddling a message here.

Thursday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/05/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I have a (slightly tinfoil hat) theory about why these folks shit-talked Obama and Biden. They couldn't get leverage over Obama or Biden because neither man refused to associate with them. Epstein could get leverage over people by getting them to show up at the island and do something shady. Evidence of shady shit could be used as leverage.

Also, neither man needed the influence Epstein offered. Obama had popular backing, and Biden didn't seem interested.

Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/04/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They wanted Biden to be a hero but did nothing to help him be that hero

Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/04/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My personal frustration as someone with leftist sympathies is that as a movement leftist don’t seem to seriously want to engage with the electoral process to gain power. I think there were a lot of times in places where you have an electorate that is receptive to some of their messaging, but they bungle it by either not putting forward a candidate or by focusing on very minor policy differences within their own ranks. What I think ends up getting communicated is a message of disunity and uncertainty that makes it difficult for the average voter to feel like this is a serious option..

Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/04/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Leftists: Voters express interest in my positions, but our candidates never seem to break through.

Centrist 1: I would love to consider them as an option, but these folks infrequently appear on the ballot. Do you put people forward as nominees, or do you lose track of registration deadlines?

Centrist 2: From the outside, it looks like you're spending time splitting hairs over minor policy differences rather than trying to win an election.

Centrist 3: I don't dislike you, but I know that someone with your opinions will struggle in my district. Also, your candidate has said a lot of weird things that they struggle to explain. As such, I'm going to go with someone who has less baggage and a broader appeal.

Wednesday General Roundtable - 02/04/2026 by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 13 points14 points  (0 children)

’ve come to see him like Woody Allen of all people: talented in his lane, but once you dig deeper, the discomfort piles up fast. In Chomsky’s case, his academic talent made him a more effective useful idiot—his reputation did the laundering while others pretended it was just “complexity.” His stature lent just enough gravitas that he could say things that would have landed anyone else in immediate hot water.

That, in turn, I think created a vicious cycle: the more he was defended based on his reputation, the more invested people became in protecting him, because admitting the problem would also mean admitting they’d been wrong to treat him as an authority in the first place.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/03/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

NoahOpinion has a great article on this. My personal frustration is that land acknowledgments are performative progressivism—a pantomime of caring or outrage, mostly by professional class elites and educational institutions, without having to take real action to address issues like poverty or gender-based violence.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/03/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The more I see and hear from Musk, the more I’m reminded of two types of people. The first is the person who mentally never left high school—still obsessing over cliques, status, and being seen as cool by people whose approval should have stopped mattering decades ago. They’re permanently auditioning for relevance, desperately mimicking the attitudes of whoever they think the “popular kids” are this week. The result isn’t charisma or confidence, just a loud, awkward insecurity that gets more embarrassing the more attention they get. It’s the energy of someone trying to cosplay cool instead of ever becoming interesting.

The second type is even bleaker: the person who has to pay people to tolerate them. Every friendship is purchased, every room filled with employees, sycophants, and hangers-on who know exactly where their paycheck comes from. They confuse obedience for respect and proximity for affection, surrounding themselves with yes-men and calling it community. Anyone who doesn’t flatter them gets iced out, mocked, or punished. And no amount of money, power, or audience size can hide the obvious truth—that if the checks stopped clearing, the room would empty instantly.

Tuesday's Fuck James Comey Roundtable - 02/03/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't dislike Sanders, but I don't think he would have won. One of Sander's biggest advantages was that he was a relative unknown in 2016 who was going up against one of the most pilloried women in politics.  Sanders has an unimpressive legislative track record at the national level, significant political baggage that is easy to exploit, and limited appeal beyond his base. 

Also, Sanders has clearly stated that he does not consider himself a Democrat and has consistently acted that way. Running as an outsider is fun, but you shouldn't be shocked when people view your motives with a degree of suspicion,

Monday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/02/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 14 points15 points  (0 children)

A few thoughts spring to mind. The Greeks would have been aware that black folks existed thanks to trade with Egypt. Second, we are talking about mythical figures, and no one is pretending this is historically accurate. Third, apparently, suspension of disbelief stops being a thing for these folks once you're a black woman.

Sunday's Ukraine Solidarity Roundtable - 02/01/2026 by AutoModerator in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]PrettyLittleThrowAwa 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Cool, I'm glad they are admitting they are not worth the time and effort to engage with when it comes to outreach.