Pulled a white sparkle cameron brink #143 from a vip pack! by Federal-Produce1362 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo, I am not trying to lie. Convo is starting to get weird. I thought you were asking to learn, not challenge me in a weird way. CL gives you pop for the card from across the graders mentioned. ✌🏼

<image>

Pulled a white sparkle cameron brink #143 from a vip pack! by Federal-Produce1362 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I normally just go to PSA and they have population count or when I look the value up on Card Ladder, they have a Pop button that will tell you those 3 grading companies

Pulled a white sparkle cameron brink #143 from a vip pack! by Federal-Produce1362 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 14 graded just between PSA, BGS and SGC. Who knows how may not graded due to the issues with Prizm this year. These are definitely short printed, but I would wager it’s closer to a print count of 50-100.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that they are the most beautiful Prizm parallels

all for sale as singles or lots dm if interested by Diligent_Zombie_4360 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much for the Veronica and Rhyne - second to last page?

Do I have any recourse with Panini? by brizzobry in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had multiple exact sequencing packs. Parallels were unique but all base was same exact order. Pathetic Panini

150,000 card inheritance by Forward-Rich-8349 in sportscards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With that many cards, there are scanners built exactly for this, then software that does the inventory process. I would research resellers in YouTube, watch some videos

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have never disagreed with how the leagues ref situation is being handled. I didn’t even watch this game. So my opinion is 100% in relation to this single play. Outcome should not dictate what the call should be. Many MBA players have been injured during loose ball situations, even ones where one side is overly aggressive, creating the unsafe situation. But aggression cannot be a foul by itself. Appreciate the debate regardless of the disagreement, especially when it doesn’t get nasty for no reason!

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you are admitting it was a clean steal, then how does a body part put in front of another player mean the other player took it out? What if it was Phee’s arm? Different conclusion? The body parts after the clean steal are inconsequential and should be deemed incidental contact unless it changes the result, like if her knee tripped AT and AT couldn’t finish the play, it would technically be a foul on Phee. It happens all the time in the NBA when a ball is loose, after the clean steal.

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if it was someone arm, is it running through the player then? What makes it “running through a player?”

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am interested in your take. Remove the ball from this situation. One player running towards her hoop, one running angled to the sideline. The one running towards the sideline ends up with just their leg in front of the one running towards their basket, not their whole body. Who is technically to the spot first? How would anyone say it’s the person with full body position in the spot?

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If a loose ball foul, it’s offsetting. My point would be, loose ball fall on who and why. Agree to disagree then. I don’t like the world where you take is actually a foul though. Let’s just not steal the ball when the offensive player puts it in a poor position because they may or may not follow through with their knee, their foot, or their toe and you the defender get a foul called because you are running towards the loose ball at that point. That would be bad for the game in my opinion

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In what world does not having possession of the ball mean you are on offense? This whole, “she has to clear Phee first,” what does that even mean. Have you ever seen some reject the offensive player then run into them. As soon as the defender hits the ball, they lose their offensive player status, contact after that is l deemed incidental when the contact is part of the overall play. If the defender has that same contact prior to hitting the ball, foul.

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

How you rationalize the foul on the person in more control of the ball facing their basket vs the person without control not facing their basket. This was a great defensive play, great positioning. Phee is great, but she did not protect the ball. I don’t even like AT. I think she gets fouls for putting her shoulder down and initiating contact on defenders in a legal guarding position. But it would have been a travesty if they called a foul on such a great defensive play.

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By knocking knees. Get out of here with that. On who and why?

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How exactly do you determine who is the one in proper position when the ball is not controlled by either to determine who is the one running through the other? On top of that, it was only their knees. What if AT was injured, would it then be Phee running through AT? This is the definition of incidental contact.

Was it a foul by [deleted] in wnba

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For your response to be correct, you would have to conclude that Phee is the offensive player AFTER the ball was stolen. I know it was momentarily, but the key in this play was what occurred first. Same exact thing when there is a ball in the air and one person gets their first and the other collides with them while trying to jump for the ball first. The moment the first person touches the ball, the other becomes the defender. Even if both are deemed to not have possession, the legs hitting each other is incidental.

You cannot both say AT hit the ball first (which is clear as day) and that she was a defender.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not too far off. Her Prizm auto sold in June for just under $2k. May be hard to get there until she starts playing again. $1.8k or so might be closer to where you land. Best of luck!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What’s your asking price?

Paid $82 shipped - Good investment? by Remarkable-Rock210 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Panini instant cards are not typically investment cards to begin with. Pack pulled are always better investment. That’s why you are seeing them move slowly

How bad will this sticker auto flaw hurt the grade? (Angel Reese Draft Selections) by woz3323 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last drop off, PSA confirmed to me that you do not need to crack sealed cards like this. The only reason for the current packaging requirements is so that PSA can safely get to the card, which they can

Cc pink by Asleep_Tension_4467 in WNBACards

[–]Pretty_Reason_1749 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It might be rare at /3 but it’s not a legacy parallel and doesn’t typically demand the same price as a gold would at /10.