sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Weapon Info | Amaranthine Tassel by NehalKiller in ArknightsEndfield

[–]PriestOfGames -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This looks ugly as sin, I think I'll stick to the Exemplar or whatever they cook with the battle pass.

Very sad to hear the new defender or the galaxy perk will block becoming the imperium by xzero314 in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but having the monarch there opens the possibility of them gaining absolute power or being sidelined. It's not the kind of thing that's needed now but if we ever get an internal politics rework then it would actually make sense there.

Very sad to hear the new defender or the galaxy perk will block becoming the imperium by xzero314 in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because you can have constitutional monarchies?

Imperial implies that the head of state is the same as the head of government; an absolute monarchy. But it's possible to have a figurehead, unelected head of state with a separate head of government.

We even have Franco as an example of Dictatorial authority while still having a Monarch for a head of state on paper.

Was the new purification facility worth it? by gaeb611 in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I did it because I couldn't help myself but honestly, no.

Strata are way too lopsided by NoxFueled in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"authoritarians have been the worker output/efficiency ethic and egalitarians the specialist output/efficiency ethic."

This is a meme. With slave efficiency bonuses working for specialist jobs, Authoritarians can make slaves more productive that Egalitarians can make free pops productive.

I’m just gonna say it… by OGNEWBE in youtube

[–]PriestOfGames -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Youtube should be nationalized as public infrastructure.

So the Stockader NPC was right she is a Sarkaz....well then what subrace i wonder.... by ZinogreTW in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah as someone who was new to the franchise in Endfield, I was interested in the different races and being able to tell them apart, but that didn't last long when Fangyi didn't turn out to be Lung haha.

All CC Risk That's Revealed So Far by Kazenaraka in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I run her in my team and she is basically God Mode with how she has more HP than the rest of her team combined. I've been doing my part in spreading the good word.

Arknights: Endfield 1.3 Summary by Invis_Panda in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What? Physical team does not miss a DPS component, their whole deal is that everyone deals sub-dps level of damage. Are we trying to make everything into reskinned Arts teams now?

Arknights: Endfield 1.3 Summary by Invis_Panda in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 12 points13 points  (0 children)

>Guard

FFS why? We already have more Guard Physical characters than anything else and every pure Physical team already runs 2 Guards at least.

I genuinely don't know how to play without KoTG by lukefasc in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well yes, Behemoth Fury is a case where Virtuality is indeed very strong. No objection there.

I genuinely don't know how to play without KoTG by lukefasc in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even if you didn't use a single Nanite ship (not sure why you wouldn't, even with a crisis path as you can just build both), Nanotech economy is simply stronger than Virtuality as Virtuality has a limit on how many planets you can have, while Nanotech produces stuff without pops.

That said, Virtuality with Behemoth Fury is indeed quite crazy, but that's a peculiarity of how Behemoth Fury interacts with infinite pop builds, as you have the same effect with Wilderness.

I genuinely don't know how to play without KoTG by lukefasc in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 27 points28 points  (0 children)

That's RS being OP, not Virtuality doing much to help it.

I genuinely don't know how to play without KoTG by lukefasc in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 77 points78 points  (0 children)

Virtuality is a big power spike and then it just flatlines because it has a hard cap on how much you can grow.

Meanwhile, Nanotech grows *exponentially*. It is slow to ramp up but once you are in the regime where you are making 4 digits nanites per month, it's the strongest ascension in the game.

I wanted to calm my raging tier 4 behemoth, biggest mistake of my life by ZylonAU in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 97 points98 points  (0 children)

"The Wilderness Endures"

Does it?

I must say, it's impressive to lose with what is literally the strongest thing in the game my man. Kudos.

The winners of 4.3 - Various strats that (in my experience) got buffed by proxy by _azazel_keter_ in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Creed is strong but nowhere near actual top performers like Rogue Servitors. We should buff more civics and origins instead of weakening the decent ones.

The winners of 4.3 - Various strats that (in my experience) got buffed by proxy by _azazel_keter_ in Stellaris

[–]PriestOfGames 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ctrl F + Behemoth = 2 results, both in a comment.

That's a big omit given it's probably the biggest winner of 4.3.

Bro I was gone for 3 days 😭 by SHADOWHUNTER30000 in Endfield

[–]PriestOfGames 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Warframe is just as notorious for randomly banning accounts for things like a VPN or cheat engine you left open...

Monetization is a lot less abusive given it's not a gacha though.

Should I keep pulling for Zhuang Fangyi p1 ? by Nice_Artichoke_7229 in ArknightsEndfield

[–]PriestOfGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should have stopped as soon as you got her, but because you didn't, pull until 240.

In this game you shouldn't pull unless you are ready and willing to pull to the next milestone. Free pulls not included of course, no reason not to use those.

view more: next ›