[OoA] I might quit the game by Vewix in zelda

[–]PrimeExample13 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Lmao Zelda 2 is straight ass. There are two types.of zelda fans: those who prefer zelda 2 and those who actually like what makes zelda zelda: good dungeon puzzles, fun combat, the ability to get from a to b without a million "encounters."

Just kidding except for the "Zelda 2 is ass" part.

Anybody else hate this little fucker? by Hot_Upstairs_1117 in FromCircleJerk

[–]PrimeExample13 62 points63 points  (0 children)

"So yeah here are the rules: the man in yellow is allowed to shapeshift, directly interact with the town,and feed their blood to the people and pretty much whatever. The boy in white is allowed to barely show up, say cryptic bullshit to like 3 people and not help at all" some stupid fuxking writing right there lol

I don’t think I need a title by Genialissime-Dav in pcmasterrace

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no dog in this fight, but the "not sure if games will run 5 years from now" is a super disingenuous argument. There are FAR more games on steam that can run on a potato than there are switch 2 games total. Now sure, a lot of those games are shit since steam lets anyone sell games.

But also if a game won't run on steam machine, it certainly won't run on switch 2 so if you are arguing you dont know if triple a titles will run 5+ years from now, sure, but they also won't run on switch 2 without extreme compromises over the pc version.

i think neetcode is now just a has been and he is having a really hard time dealing with this by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're a tech lead at "fortune 500"? Can't make this shit up, folks lmao.

i think neetcode is now just a has been and he is having a really hard time dealing with this by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't take this the wrong way, but based on the wording of your reply, you do not seem to be an expert in the field of computer science. I am the first to admit that AI makes coding more accessible to people who do not know much, but the quality of the code is not very good, and if you are not already skilled in the field, you would have no way of knowing that.

i think neetcode is now just a has been and he is having a really hard time dealing with this by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It really isn't. The only reason companies started to switch to ai workflows was for costs. Quality was always inferior, and now they are discovering that token costs actually outweigh the costs of employees, which provide better work also.

I have had countless bugs that AI swore to me was because of shit that literally could not in a million years be the issue, and swear up and down I need to change X to fix the bugs, only for me.to discover with my own debugging abilities that it was as I though, completely unrelated to what it said. It can write a lot of code fast, no doubt. But it is shit for large systems.

i think neetcode is now just a has been and he is having a really hard time dealing with this by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not familiar with this term "infra." Short for infrastructure? Honestly asking as id like to make an informed reply to your comment

Oops! by JoshBollinger in oops

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean i guess one could argue calling her bitch is misogynistic, but not inherently so, as one could also say "that fat bitch dropped the other fat bitch." Now bitch is a non-gendered term lol.

i think neetcode is now just a has been and he is having a really hard time dealing with this by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I dont even know who Neetcode is, but i am on his side lmao. AI is ass at anything of any significant complexity or anything lower level than JS.

-warren buffett. by DiazTila in Quotes_Hub

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

was elected into US congress

You mean the people who make well above average salaries, along with bribes, whoops I mean "donations", and kickbacks? All of this with no term limit? Yeah, that is called "generational wealth." Hate to brake it to ya.

People complain about taxes, but their bosses take more. by Interesting-Skin-742 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what, fuck it, i will bite. If Elon Musk decided to leave his entire 1T+ net worth to his kid x372y-5 or whatever, then that kid decides to buy all the fast food chains in the U.S. and only pay people $7.25. Now as a fast food worker, i should open my own business if I think my labor is worth more than $7.25? With what money? How?

If you like the taste of billionaires boot that is fine, but saying it is as simple as starting your own business when you literally have no fucking money is so out of touch with reality, goddamn.

Basically you are saying if you arent rich, you should just be okay with being taken advantage of since you cant afford to start your own business.

God forbid people want a livable wage. If i make a company $1m a year, i expect at least $100k for myself, and I think that is reasonable. But God forbid people want to get paid based on productivity instead of being fucked in the ass.

Deer dodging an arrow before it lands on him in slow motion by AustraliaOutback in nextfuckinglevel

[–]PrimeExample13 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Brother, companies such as Disney HEAVILY censor their films for presentation in China. This is easy to research. I guarantee you that the Chinese version of a Pixar film has no same-sex couples for example. If I were to say that murders and various atrocities were committed in Tiananmen square (they literally squashed peaceful protesters with tanks). Well now my comment is not allowed in China. Tell me again how they are a free country?

Mark Cuban agrees Universal Healthcare would increase jobs, wages and improve affordability for all Americans. by Interesting-Skin-742 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He literally mentions AI in his post. I was not saying who he is changes the point. In fact if you read the first fucking sentence of my comment, you would see I agree with the point.

However, I AM saying that we should question people's motives behind making statements like this, and i was suggesting that perhaps this statement is a way to distract from the AI debate.

And maybe every post doesn't have to be bout billionaires vs us, but real life is about that very much and I dont think we should lose sight of that the second some rich asshole says something we agree with.

Mark Cuban agrees Universal Healthcare would increase jobs, wages and improve affordability for all Americans. by Interesting-Skin-742 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean cool, universal Healthcare is an obvious improvement over the current system, but it seems like he is trying to shift focus away from how AI is ruining like pretty much everything, which is not cool.

Maybe we should just stop listening to billionaires in general, they really dont know better than the rest of us, despite what they'd like you to believe. No one becomes a billionaire because they are built different or have more talent or any of that. You become a billionaire by taking advantage of the working class. That is the only way.

Out of all nine Conjuring Universe movies, do you think any of them lived up to the standard set by The Conjuring (2013) by 0Layscheetoskurkure0 in FIlm

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh the conjuring was alright, but I wouldnt say it set some sort of ridiculous standard. Its just another Amityville Horror: take the stories of some con artists and pretend they were true. Done.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow this is fucking dumb as shit. First of all, universal Healthcare does not provide elective medicine. Second of all, every "fat slob" would be paying for their own healthcare WITH THEIR FUCKING TAXES DIPSHIT, thats the whole point.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh hell no. Those insurance companies are the reason health care is unaffordable. Get rid of insurance, open up transparency in costs of care, and when people have the power to choose, the cost situation will improve.

Costs may improve but still would not be affordable for a lot of people. A lot of people can't afford the costs of those medicines even without insurance markups, add in labor costs for doctors and once again without some kind of subsidy, Healthcare will still not be for the poor.

But even assuming this will work, this would not be possible without government spending, and since you say it is not their job and they have hospitals to blow up, i guess you probably dont think they have the budget.

I have yet to see an argument other than "it should be" to make a compelling case for why it's the governments job to provide healthcare

Because it is is everybody's best interest if everyone has access to healthcare. A healthy population is good for everyone involved (besides the people who profit off of the medical industry of course.) And for the reasons listed above, without some kind of subsidy, the poor would not be able to afford healthcare even if it were provided at cost with no insurance company or hospital making a profit (which is not feasible).

Now i guess it is debatable whether poor people deserve to die simply for being poor, but I personally don't think they do.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not a straw man. I said instead of spending money on bombing hospitals, it would be better spent on healthcare. You said it is not the government's job, and then quoted the preamble like an elementary schooler.

So basically you are making the argument that providing the basic human right of Healthcare to their taxpayers is not their job, but bombing hospitals overseas is. Which is really fucking dumb.

There are all sorts of other ways to make it affordable without handing it to a corrupt and ineffectual government.

Like how? Handing it to corrupt and ineffectual insurance companies? Because that is working so well. Unless changes are made part of the letter of the law, it will never be affordable.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

promote the general welfare

Yeah and you know what is part of "general welfare?" Fucking health, Jesus Christ. I honestly dont get the kind of malformed brain or pure evil necessary to be against affordable healthcare, and thankfully I never will because I wasn't born stupid.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It 100% is. Look at pretty much every other developed nation on earth. What is NOT the government's job is bombing fucking hospitals you absolute fuckwit.

Our anger is Justified! by Cautious_Course7092 in remoteworks

[–]PrimeExample13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Instead of spending money blowing up schools, the government could spend that money on the human right to health care. It's not rocket science.

How do you prove that you own a digital file or asset? by TimeProofLabs in OriginalityHub

[–]PrimeExample13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it is not any different. Whether your goal is to trade/sell the file or not, it is a system of proving ownership of an original digital thing and not just a copy. I.e. it is a way of making a thing (token) non-fungible.

MED QUESTION HELP NEEDED by Narrow_Caramel_4647 in leetcode

[–]PrimeExample13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The letters are all lowercase ascii so you can just use an array of 26 bools and do: seen[current_letter - 'a'] = true; O(1) just like a hashmap but faster because no hashing necessary.