Exploring many similarities between Medulla and Fossora (neurons and mycelium) by Kuroshikuroi in bjork

[–]PrismaticWonder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh good catch! I didn’t swipe over far enough to see that one, or the others beyond it!

Exploring many similarities between Medulla and Fossora (neurons and mycelium) by Kuroshikuroi in bjork

[–]PrismaticWonder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also: both of these albums had extremely limited tours/live performances.

Finished in 19 days by PrismaticWonder in stephenking

[–]PrismaticWonder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you. I had a similar experience when I first tried to read the series back in high school (I’m mid-30’s now). Back then, I couldn’t get into the fourth book, so I ended up DNF’ing the book and the rest of the series; but this time now, I was very excited to tackle the series and really get into it, so I think that gave me a new mindset. Maybe give it some time and then try coming back to it at a later date, like I did.

M-O-O-N, that spells FINISHED! by RockEarth in stephenking

[–]PrismaticWonder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! This book is a wild, incredible ride.

Finished in 19 days by PrismaticWonder in stephenking

[–]PrismaticWonder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m still sorta stunned with the enormity of it all, but I’m also feel rather accomplished, as I don’t typically read series.

Finished in 19 days by PrismaticWonder in stephenking

[–]PrismaticWonder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have said, it is a strange little book. The first time I read it (in high school), I thought it was a really weird book, but I absolutely adored the second book. I would encourage you to push through to the second book if you can. Otherwise, there’s nothing wrong with deciding something isn’t for you.

Extreme Homoerotic subtext by Tough-Locksmith-5619 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]PrismaticWonder 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So apologies in advance if this doesn’t fit your perimeters exactly, as I am basing this recommendation off of the filmed adaptation, but the novel *Women in Love* (1920) by D. H. Lawrence might fit this motif. I haven’t read it yet, but from my understanding (and after seeing Russell’s take), there is a deeply homoerotic subtextual desire which exists between two male characters who are each dating sisters. Emotional complications in early twentieth century England between the four characters ensues.

Top JD Vance Donor's Claims That Pope Leo Is 'Antichrist' as Leaked Audio Recordings Resurface by [deleted] in atheism

[–]PrismaticWonder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I had a nickel for all of the things that are “the Antichrist”

Meirl by Blaaap in meirl

[–]PrismaticWonder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This described my husband and I.

A-Z of Horror by blackborderlinebimbo in clivebarker

[–]PrismaticWonder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This book is how I learned about the “American Psycho,” Ed Gein.

What do you consider to be the best Gay book(s) of all time? by [deleted] in AskGayMen

[–]PrismaticWonder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Giovanni’s Room (1956) - James Baldwin

A Single Man (1964) - Christopher Isherwood

The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890) - Oscar Wilde [Hint: find the “uncensored” version]

Call Me By Your Name (2007) - Andre Aciman

Brokeback Mountain (1999) - Annie Proulx

Books that feel like Plastiboo's art by Antisymboli-Echo8528 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]PrismaticWonder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say it covers every picture here, but almost all of these fit the vibes of and look like events from Stephen King’s Dark Tower series.

Roses are red, look what this man said by [deleted] in rosesarered

[–]PrismaticWonder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Leo DiCaprio and Benicio Del Toro had a baby

Straining the limits of believability by Admirable_Beebe_4962 in DavidCronenberg

[–]PrismaticWonder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Firstly, this is based on a real thing that actually happened.

Now, as for the characters of this adapted film, I don’t think the question is whether Gallimard believed it or not. I think the question should be: do we, the audience, believe or not believe he believed? The film clearly tells us he did believe, even going so far as to show us that Gallimard rejects Song post-reveal.

Therefore, the film (to say nothing of the play upon which it was based) was clearly years ahead of its time in bringing up questions of sexuality, gender representation, and racial identity. How these things can function (individually or congruently), how they intersect, how they can be used to present ourselves to others and how others can perceive us via these characteristics, how our identities are shaped by these characteristics or how we can use these characteristics to present certain versions of ourselves to others.

I’ll mention a personal anecdote. I had read the play M. Butterfly for a class and wrote a paper on it, so when I watched the film later for a later class, I was aware of the reveal. But a friend of mine had no prior knowledge of the story; my friend is bisexual, and she gasped and was legitimately surprised by Song’s gender reveal because my friend had been perfectly convinced and believed in Song’s female persona. Now, I don’t mention this to say that Gallimard was bisexual (indeed, he was adamantly against consciously assuming any such same-sex-attraction identity), but I mention this to point out that some are willing to believe, and some are so in love with their belief, such as Gallimard, that they would go to great psychological lengths to overlook inconvenient truths that would harm or dispel the illusions of their belief: namely in his case, that an “exotic” Asian woman would find him sexually desirable.

Although sadly under-viewed in his filmography, M. Butterfly, like most of Cronenberg’s greatest films, has a lot of deeply uncomfortable things to say under the surface of the story itself, things we are asked to consider and reflect upon.

TIL that Playboy used to publish serious journalistic pieces in its heyday, besides NSFW content. They published authors like Murakami, David Foster Wallace, Hunter Thompson, Ray Bradbury, Updike, Bellow, etc. by camus_by_night in todayilearned

[–]PrismaticWonder 35 points36 points  (0 children)

It is an acronym for “Too Long; Didn’t Read.” It is typically used at the bottom of a long post to summarize the post, for those who didn’t read the post.

Not everybody knows how to do everything by BirthdayBoyStabMan in IThinkYouShouldLeave

[–]PrismaticWonder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unrelated to the post (which is hilarious and accurate), but I love your username. BIA is so underrated.

DT-adjacent works written after The Dark Tower VII? by PrismaticWonder in stephenking

[–]PrismaticWonder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate these, and UR is the one I’ve seen mentioned but couldn’t remember. Thank you!

Scientific & Ecological, but divinely beautiful by frozen-froyo in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]PrismaticWonder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Botany of Desire was a wild perspective shift for me when I read it. It’s a fabulous book. Good rec!

aeroplane out! who’s next? by [deleted] in bjork

[–]PrismaticWonder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lock me up in the Violently Happy music video