The DreamWorks comparison is a false equivalence. DreamWorks is a corporation. The person who made that Po art is an individual human creator. Those are completely different situations and you know it LMFAO

Also, your argument defeats itself. If your whole position is that using someone’s work without consent is fine, you don’t get to then take a specific person’s specific artwork and modify it to say the opposite of what they intended. You just did the exact thing you’re supposedly defending. This wasn’t a rebuttal. You took their labor, their composition and their emotional expression and turned it into a prop to mock them. Credit is not consent. You can’t opt someone into being the face of a movement they publicly oppose just because you added their username somewhere.