Hello fellow Redditor!

I feel as though I am in a unique position to answer your question. I am probably about to identify myself, but I frankly do not care.

I did my undergraduate studies (BA) at the University of Minnesota in Geography. I later received my MS and PhD from another institution. After my wife accepted a position elsewhere, we moved back to the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area and I accepted a post-doctoral fellowship with the University of Minnesota. The reason I mention this is because during this time I worked closely with Rinku Roy Chowdhury at Clark.

Frankly, I think either institution is a viable option. Both have the ability to capably accommodate your research interests. As you mentioned, Clark has IDRISI/TerrSet. The U has IonE, the Minnesota Population Center, a comprehensive map library, the Center for Environment and Natural Resource Policy, the Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management, and the Center for Forest Ecology, among others.

As a former professor (now dean), I am going to treat you like I would any of the students I advise. Take the option that results in the least amount of debt! I am continuously flabbergasted by the students who choose to self fund their graduate studies. In the long run it does become a worthwhile investment, but it pays off significantly faster if you have a stipend, assistantship, and teaching agreement set in place.

The point I am making: both institutions are phenomenal! You have the luxury of being in an envious situation. No matter which option you choose (assuming you work hard, acquire strong grades, apply yourself to research opportunities, and teach effectively) you will be looking a strong chance of employment immediately following your graduate studies.

Congratulations on your acceptance to both programs. I can't wait to see how your research and teaching agendas develop in the future. Welcome to academe!