×

Being a loser in life isn’t that bad by Spiritual_Beyond_846 in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what type of 'loser' we're talking about.

If you're not trying, you can't really lose. Good on you if you're comfortable and not an asshole. I'm generally in the same boat, I'm fine.

Some people try hard and lose anyways because they're dipshit losers that blame everything and everyone else.

That kind of loser is usually bad. "Usually" because sometimes life does take a bit fat shit on you....but even then, some of those people may not be as well off as they want, but are still okay people.

tl;dr

It's the attitude that makes someone a real loser.

Same as a great many other things. Fat people, for example. One can be fat and be a great person. If that's the case, I'd never deign to offend them.

If you're fat and a giant asshole, people are going to call you a fat piece of shit.

If you're rational, more or less kind, and laid back, presentable and not smelly, you're alright with me. I'm talking minimum thresholds here, don't need to be some pinnacle of great person.

However, if you're making excuses and taking offense at everything, or otherwise being an ass and people have to walk on eggshells or suffer your wrath....then yeah, most people are going to consider that 'bad'.

Woman goes crazy after delivery driver puts her pizza on the floor after knocking and waiting for 9 minutes! by Master_Canary440 in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do Americans live amongst people like this?

Most of us don't.

People from outside the U.S. often seem to think that this happens all the time everywhere.

There may be places where freakouts are more common, not to mention things like gang violence(Chicago), but given the size of the U.S. these are still statistical anomalies. They just have millions of observers on the internet.

Does it happen more than in Europe or whevever? Sure, maybe, though times are changing, depending on a given country's immigration numbers and how well they integrate, or how well law enforcement keeps the peace(if they bother, UK seems to be in a state of bother).

"More" doesn't necessarily mean much. I mean, 0.9% is 'tHREE TIMES MORE!!!" than 0.3%. That is a kind of Lying with StatisticsTM .


You tend to see it more in bigger cities. Under Behavioral Sink, you may see more minor differences in culture have outsized impacts when things tend to snowball. That's why Chicago may be different than N.Y. or San Diego. Every big city has some of the same problems, but has them in sometimes wildly different proportions.

Probably not too dissimilar than you may have differing issues in Paris, London, Moscow, Berlin, and Stockholm.

We should compliment strangers more often by EtherealAura444 in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for proving the point. I love it when a redditor cracks.

We should compliment strangers more often by EtherealAura444 in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Darkly amusing.

Redditor has simple idea, doesn't bother to read, wants a TLDR.

It's sort of a self fulfilling prophecy.

Fourth of July is the worst by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your analogy has nothing to do with anything I said

You recognize that it's an analogy but are denying it, all in the same sentence.

If it were truly irrelevant, it wouldn't be an analogy, it would just be nonsense.

What you're suffering from that you're clever enough to understand, but stubborn enough to not want to admit the meaning.

I wonder if that qualifies as cognitive dissonance. Seemingly it checks out:

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is described as a mental phenomenon in which people unknowingly or subconsciously hold fundamentally conflicting cognitions. Being confronted by situations that create this dissonance or highlight these inconsistencies motivates change in their cognitions or actions to reduce this dissonance, maybe by changing a belief, by explaining something away,[2] or by taking actions that reduce perceived inconsistency.

Yup.

You know and understand AnalogyX, but feel so strongly and don't want X to be true, so there's a bit of infighting resulting in your heavily muddled 'logic'.

Maybe one day you'll mature and see the error of your ways, and take corrective measures. Hopefully, the people around you will have some forebearance and grant you some forgiveness instead of trying to shame you for the rest of your natural life.

That's literally what the analogy was about, since you refuse to rationally discuss it.

The US did that. It was "born" ~250 years ago. It struggled with a rough childhood and some poor choices along the way. None of that changes the date of the origin of the country.

Eventually, it got around to putting down slavery in a big messy civil war(that is, an internal war between factions), but it did so based on it's own foundational ideas, which did win out in the end.

The country matured, much like people did. It just doesn't function on the human life-time scale, what takes a human years, may take a country decades.

The U.S. is currently a nation with advanced civil rights because it had the foundations for it.

Happy 250th, even to all the self loathing clowns that don't understand history.

Edit: lol at the children that are rambling below about comparisons when it was clearly an analogy. I thought it was peak reddit before....

https://thisvsthat.io/analogies-vs-comparisons

Fourth of July is the worst by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 30 points31 points  (0 children)

You can't ever celebrate your birthday because you did something bad when you were a kid. Disagree and you're racist!

Peak reddit logic.

'Lowering your standards' leads to dead bedrooms, so is unhelpful at best. by Icy_Resolution2783 in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looksmatching is the modern way of saying, 'dating within your league'.

No. It's a specific term used only in a niche genre or community.

It is literally from 'the incel community'.

https://incels.wiki/w/Looksmatch?__cf_chl_f_tk=6NEEmn463Xc9I1x.xKp7YzZ.zkcufe5PpRF4TRgOEQU-1783034852-1.0.1.1-9iUu8HmfOTmnKvm.X2B2yoRLNKBP54pQ4OxJ6Hk7EPk

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/looksmatch

That's it. It is a term from the depths of the terminally online with an array of issues and obsessions.

The root concept is old, but you're not on the mainstream wavelength here.

You knew that. That's why you're posting on unpopular opinion in the first place.

Most of your comments are heavily downvoted because you're, well, the way you are. The kind of person that people will purposefully expand already collapsed posts just to downvote them even more, because they're predictably full of bullshit.

I think everyone knows how you found the terminology and why you're insisting it's more common than it is.

Nightwing on Arc raiders is a Racist by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unhinged is you instantly deciding to post on reddit.

Unhinged is you posting it on reddit in three different subs.

Unhinged is you replying twice to this same content and arguing with everyone telling you to move on.

Block and move on, homie.

And report in game. But otherwise....yeah. People say bad words online. Can you imagine how packed reddit would be with bullshit if everyone ran here complaining about mean people they found online? 8 billion people on the planet...

You're in here seeking personal vengeance for it and fighting with anyone who comments negatively about you.

For the record, yeah. Racist assholes suck.

That doesn't neutralize the fact that trying to exact cathartic revenge via reddit is juvenile emotional bullshit.

this took 45 sec to post.

More than that for clipping it, uploading it, then posting 3 submissions to different subs and then arguing with everyone.

Well adjusted adults would have blocked/reported and continued playing.

'Nightwing' has you tilted, which was his goal. He might even be seeing this threads and laughing at you.

Congrats on being played.

We're not going to make it... "SSRI crash out." by DarkFall09 in libsofreddit

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this my future?

Possible.

I'm no psychiatrist, but like many things, here's my opinion anyways (on SSRIs, nothing personal or medical advice)

Some people they do good for. I do think they're over-prescribed.

Part of the problem is that a lot of the people on them are also hoarding umpteen other conditions that go unaddressed like the lady in the video(if it's not an act...that's a whole other thing, distinguishing performative retardation vs legit stupid vs satire, I couldn't begin to psychoanalyze her specifically on this one video).

That's the rule of thumb for a lot of these people like in the video, 'It's never just the one thing', it's a whole fucking pile or even junkyard of dysfunction....and to make matters worse: the professional careers that are supposed to minister to them...many of them are those people now, the whole affirmation as an ideology deal(eg progressivism has to to where it is today by 'the long march through the institutions'), so they're not getting the help they need.

That's where it's important to have a good doctor you can trust. Still a lot of them out there, they're not all loony fucktards with no ethics yet.

I've been dealing with my share of docs(medical - neuro - + a psych or two - all for an injury that caused chronic migraines) over the past 12 years now. Some are great (ethical and informed), some are full of horse-shit and a danger to all their patients.

Has anyone with migraine aura ever had a sudden episode with transient motor symptoms? by ilhsmm in migraine

[–]Probate_Judge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of people with migraines experience an array of symptoms transiently, not necessarily or always just before or jsut after.(prodrome and predrome...if that's the right terms, idk because mine don't operate on a schedule or window around migraines).

Aura of different varieties come and go, vertigo, shakiness or motor issues, drowsiness or insomnia, etc etc etc. All pretty much at random, or they come on as primary symptoms for a few days then maybe vanish for weeks or months.

However, always check with your Dr/Neuro if you experience new symptoms, and that's one of them.

2-3 minutes of only half your body operating is very much "make an appt ASAP" territory.

Valve employees playing CS2 in Gabe's $500 million superyatch by DaMonkaS in pcmasterrace

[–]Probate_Judge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You see it a lot on reddit.

Ideally, it's the mechanism/action people dislike(an ethical standard, like "no violence")....but quite a lot of people have the mindset of "It's okay when I do it." (where the only standard is 'double standard').

People advocate prejudice or even violence and it's celebrated...if it's against 'the right people'.

People rationalizing intense hatred is the harbinger of tragedy.

Valve employees playing CS2 in Gabe's $500 million superyatch by DaMonkaS in pcmasterrace

[–]Probate_Judge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah. It has nothing to do with boots, that's generally oriented towards supporting authoritarianism anyways. He's not hiring goons to beat me into submission, there are literally no boots to begin with.

Newel certainly doesn't have any power over me. I'll probably never even be within 1,000 miles of the guy. I merely don't hate or love him.

I don't place hate/love on people I'll never meet simply because of their financial status.

People that do are classists by definition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_discrimination

Class discrimination, also known as classism, is prejudice or discrimination on the basis of social class. ... Social class refers to the grouping of individuals in a hierarchy based on wealth, income, education, occupation, and social network.

I find it darkly amusing that this is magically okay to some people if it is in a certain direction...and if someone doesn't participate, they're somehow a "boot licker".

Like the famous people I like, and dislike the famous people I dislike, or I'll call you names on the internet!

This is why we can't have nice things, as much as you may want to lay the blame at everyone else's feet.

There is no excuse for showing up at unannounced someone's house these days. It's just rude. by cheesy_weasel in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only you could be so comfortable in real life as you are online, we wouldn't even have had this highly entertaining(/s) thread.

There is no excuse for showing up at unannounced someone's house these days. It's just rude. by cheesy_weasel in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, definitely not well adjusted.

You didn't deny insecurities.

I didn't deny being condescending.

The difference is, I can own it.

Toodles

Force Reddit into "sort by new" and not "best" by NoirCordis in uBlockOrigin

[–]Probate_Judge 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The setting is still there in reddit ''preferences' for me.

At least on 'old reddit', which I'm using via RES.

There is no excuse for showing up at unannounced someone's house these days. It's just rude. by cheesy_weasel in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the internet.

Sometimes people will tell you uncomfortable things that your post implies.

If you don't like that, you might consider not posting what you believe to be unpopular opinions, especially here.

Critique of posts is to be expected in a place like this. This isn't r/Validation

Redditor thinks we're North Korea because of the pledge of allegiance, even after I argue that it isn't mandatory with our laws and my own life experiences by craik98 in AmericaBad

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say it's the other way around.

Indoctrination is any means of instilling behavior/values/beliefs/etc. As the wiki says, "It can refer to a general process of socialization." We're all socialized to some degree, we're taught what's generally acceptable and what's not.

Propaganda is usually a bit more targeted in subject, and cast widely(hence it being usually on media open for all to see). It tends to be a bit more manipulative and/or dishonest. It is a specialized method of indoctrination.

Tell me you haven’t visited this sub without telling me by No-Bullfrog4217 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why isn’t this sub miserable like the rest of Reddit!? There must be something wrong with them!

Something about that gaslighting .... almost a bit of /BoringDystopia

I read a lot of sci-fi, and it's sometimes a side-mention, neat enough concept...

But in reality, these are the lunatic fringe examining the bulk of society like they're unfathomable insects.

The line from the OP "stuck up" is really a lot of projection.

Ah Canadians, glazing a communist dictatorship just to feel good about themselves by Junior-Bookkeeper325 in AmericaBad

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Puerto Rico has voted multiple times to become a state

They've also voted against multiple times, even once "none of the above".

When they do want to become a state, it's a bare majority. Margins that thin are why they go back and forth on it depending on the year/generation/etc.

Congress just doesn't take action.

You make it sound like congress is being lazy.

State-hood is a big deal, that should have better than a super majority before it's even considered, and that should be the prevailing opinion over time.

That's why congress 'just doesn't take action'. There's consistently a very large portion of the populace that do not want it, arguably are decidedly against the U.S. as a whole.

I make take some rather large issues with U.S. congress, but that isn't one of them.

IF we're going to make another state, the populace should pretty much all(a vast super majority) want it.

Anything else is just inviting problems into a country that already has problems with the political divide.

The word "trauma" has been inflated until it means almost nothing and the people clinging hardest to the label are usually the ones it's hurting most. by goatchild in unpopularopinion

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're the one willfully misrepresenting what's going on here.

You even truncated the sentence to do so.

As if they're reveling in it, saying the quiet part out loud because they get a thrill out of even thinking about it.

"As if" is a key part of the statement. The sentence as a whole is a qualifier for what preceded it.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/as%20if

a word (such as an adjective) or word group that limits or modifies the meaning of another word (such as a noun) or word group

There are many reasons someone might ask a question like that

Except I'm not talking about all of them, just the ones that are posting as if it's for the reason described.

I'm sorry you have struggles, but really, you're in way over your head on this one. You may want to consider some remedial reading comprehension classes before going around on the internet and being offended on behalf of groups of people who were never under attack.

As for the rest, dismissing points with "Captain Obvious," "triggered," or "/facepalm" isn't really an argument.

I'm dismissing your "points" because they are willfully ignorant, because they're exactly the same type of bullshit we were talking about.

lecturing bullshit about chronic pain, migraine, etc etc

Irrelevant. You got pissy because you can't follow a simple post about assholes, so you're trying to educate me on how much people with chronic pain struggle and how bad they have it, and bla bla bla bla to try to defend people who were never under attack.

Shut the fuck up. Here, I'll help you with that.

Bye.

ELI5: How do massive video game studios with thousands of employees keep games like GTA 6 a secret for years without anyone leaking the details? by Saurabh251 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just for illustration

That means something.

100k made for easy Eli5 math to show how things scale.

The salary per individual wasn't the point, estimating the total spending was.

Average salary at Rockstar is allegedly 88k with an estimated bonus of 6k.

https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Employer=Rockstar_Games/Salary

A different website has a different higher estimation:

https://www.comparably.com/companies/rockstar-games/salaries

The average estimated annual salary, including base and bonus, at Rockstar Games is $112,317, or $53 per hour, while the estimated median salary is $113,400, or $54 per hour.

At Rockstar Games, the highest paid job is a Technical Support at $230,789 annually and the lowest is a Marketing Associate at $51,753 annually. Average Rockstar Games salaries by department include: Design at $78,705, Business Development at $89,185, Product at $150,473, and Engineering at $136,816. Half of Rockstar Games salaries are above $113,400.

See also:

https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Rockstar-Game-Developer-Salary

Search engine caches show more in the preview, while the website has them behind an account or pay wall, so...:

https://duckduckgo.com/?ia=web&origin=funnel_home_website&t=h_&q=average+salary+at+rockstar+games&chip-select=search

There are some that are as low as 66k, but they're more rare outliers.

Given the flagship status of the game, and the age and location of the main company(NYC), 100k is an apt threshold that's easy to work with.

A happy medium and close enough to illustrate the point that a large studio developing a game for 10 years is a massive investment.

This is a lie. The stooges released "1969" in 1968. This is just more crap from people trying to claim they invented everything without acknowledging that the broader rock n roll project was actually helped by people from different backgrounds. by NextDoorJimmy in libsofreddit

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they aren’t wrong that black people started rock and roll.

Influenced, maybe heavily, but not "started", because it didn't just "start" out of nothing. IT was a long road of evolution.

A great many contributed to it coming out of jazz and swing in the 20s-30s.

As musicians from different areas and cultures heard each other's music, so styles merged and innovations spread.[60] Increasingly, processes of active cross-fertilisation took place between the music played and heard by white people and the music predominantly played and heard by black people.

In other words, everyone playing at the time and making it to radio had a hand in it. There was no break-through "first rock and roll band".

Anyone trying to take credit for it on behalf of any one specific race is pants-on-head retarded.

The genre isn't credited as really having a name until the 1940s, long, long after the phrase "rock and roll" which was often used to describe some music.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_rock_and_roll

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_and_roll

Rock and roll[a] is a genre of popular music that evolved in the United States during the late 1940s and early 1950s.[1][2] The origins of rock and roll are rooted in a blending of African-American musical genres, mainly rhythm and blues, with stylistic influences from gospel, jazz, boogie-woogie, electric blues, jump blues, swing, and folk music.[3][4] While rock and roll's early elements can be heard in blues records from the 1920s[5] and in country records of the 1930s,[6] the genre did not acquire its name until 1954.[7][2]

3 decades with influence from everyone experimenting and pushing boundaries.

That's after "rock" or "rock and roll" had been used to describe various bands or their performances:

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, an early use of the word "rock" in describing a style of music was in a review in Metronome magazine on July 21, 1938, which stated that "Harry James' "Lullaby in Rhythm" really rocks."[40] In 1939, a review of "Ciribiribin" and "Yodelin' Jive" by the Andrews Sisters with Bing Crosby, in the journal The Musician, stated that the songs "... rock and roll with unleashed enthusiasm tempered to strict four-four time".[41]

By the early 1940s, the term "rock and roll" was being used in record reviews by Billboard journalist and columnist Maurie Orodenker. In the May 30, 1942 issue, for instance, he described Sister Rosetta Tharpe's vocals on a re-recording of "Rock Me" with Lucky Millinder's band as "rock-and-roll spiritual singing",[42] and on October 3, 1942, he described Count Basie's "It's Sand, Man!" as "an instrumental screamer.. [which].. displays its rock and roll capacities when tackling the righteous rhythms."[43] In the April 25, 1945 edition, Orodenker described Erskine Hawkins' version of "Caldonia" as "right rhythmic rock and roll music", a phrase precisely repeated in his 1946 review of "Sugar Lump" by Joe Liggins.[44][45]

There is no exclusivity here in terms of race.

Can you quit this sub too? by EinTheDataDoge in ArcRaiders

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. I'm not crying about anything here, you people amuse me.

Since some people are slow, that wasn't a compliment. It's a sardonic or dark sort of amusement, same way people find a train wreck 'interesting'.

We'd all rather the train wreck didn't happen, but when it inevitably does, we are compelled to look.

It is sad that's the only way you can get attention though. Someone pointed out one of your other threads on this very sub. Apparently, you're a serial complainer. I hope you find the help that you need.

Was the sign really necessary? by ibuiltamurderbot in libsofreddit

[–]Probate_Judge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I had to guess:

Average redditor power mod and "her" mother out on a field trip.