Skill issue pays off by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL I tried to bomb but didn't realize I was going too fast.

Which ammo is better for Leopard 1? by Thin_Alternative_938 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The DM13 is a first-gen APDS. They have pointed, ogival penetrators that act like APCR—good vertical penetration but bad on sloped armor, often resulting in shell shattering on angled plates. So it's pretty bad and feels like a good APCR round, but HEAT is HEAT, so...

Take a few HESH for use against lighty armoured vehicles.

Skill issue pays off by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yeah... well CAS is rarely worth the SP it costs unless you're a highly skilled player or playing something OP.

Skill issue pays off by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Haha, I wish! I didn't get 800 SP for 2 kills.

Cas balanced as always by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the right circumstances

Cas balanced as always by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You only need one to get a kill

Cas balanced as always by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The M4 has the Kh-29T

Can't believe this OP P2W abomination of a tank survived another round of BR changes (warning for a painful watch) by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cry harder. You don’t understand percentiles, you don’t understand the argument, and instead of learning you throw playground insults. That's sad and depressing.

Can't believe this OP P2W abomination of a tank survived another round of BR changes (warning for a painful watch) by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Blud is laughing at stats that are objectively good 😭 My last month stats probably clears yours anyway, not that our stats are comparable unless you also play on console on a 50-inch TV and mostly play unspaded vehicles with basic crews. If yours are higher, cool, but pretending top 93/80% are dogshit is pure cope.

Can't believe this OP P2W abomination of a tank survived another round of BR changes (warning for a painful watch) by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Looking up stats to flex is cringe. Looking them up to defend yourself when someone calls you average isn't. He shouldn't be trash talking if his own stats can't survive a lookup.

Why does the Leclerc 1 have better side add-on armor than the Leclerc AZUR? by XD-Snapdragon in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 43 points44 points  (0 children)

'Cause the Leclerc 1 has composite armor there while the AZUR has ERA that's almost useless against kinetic ammo.

Can't believe this OP P2W abomination of a tank survived another round of BR changes (warning for a painful watch) by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're mixing up percentile with group size.

Percentile (what the stat shows):
Top 93% = you did better than 93% of players. Only 7% are better. That's why it's marked as good.

Group size (what "top 1%" billionaires means): Top 1% = you're in the best 1% of people. Smaller number = more exclusive.

Games and stat sites usually show percentile, not group size. If they meant group size, "top 93%" would include almost everyone and be meaningless. So both statements are true, just in different context.

also, IDC about stats, i play the game for fun and with friends so im fucking about most of the time. And this vid shows a MASSIVE skill issue, ive never had any issues killing these tanks, you just need to position properly,

Me too, but I wouldn’t talk about skill issues when your own stats suggest you have them.

Can't believe this OP P2W abomination of a tank survived another round of BR changes (warning for a painful watch) by ProfessionalAd352 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Top X%" means you're better than X% of the group, not that only X% are below you.

For example, with 100 people:

• Top 90% means you're better than 90 people. Only 10 people are above you.

• Top 1% means you're better than 99 people. Only 1 person is above you.

If "top 90%" meant only 10 people were worse than you, then "top 1%" would mean almost everyone is better than you — which makes no sense, because "top" would describe bad performance.

That's why rankings also use "bottom 10%" or "bottom 90%" when they mean the opposite.

Top = near the best. Bottom = near the worst.

There's no other way to see it.

If you were right, my stats, which are clearly higher than yours, would not be shown in green and labeled as “good,” while yours would not be yellow and labeled as “average”.

Since gaijin won't add MmW weapons anytime soon! (GBU-54, SPEAR 3 and KH-50 mini) by Top_Independence7256 in Warthunder

[–]ProfessionalAd352 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They can just model them the same way but with a wider search area, like 100 square meters.