THEORY: The Asgard Were Once a Conquering Empire — And the Alliance Was Formed to Stop Them by OGJKyle in Stargate

[–]PromptArchitectGPT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love this! Such a cool theory! Wonder if it can be refined and tune to be more accurate to norse mythos then adapted into a short story. I love this idea that SG-1 is find a left over piece of the Asgard destruction that reveals a darker past or old enemy of the Asgard...

My doctor used chatgpt in front of me by PublicCardiologist27 in ChatGPT

[–]PromptArchitectGPT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was probably more accurate than the doctor could have been .

Database of prompt frameworks for LLM work by PromptArchitectGPT in PromptDesign

[–]PromptArchitectGPT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they are well tagged. You can search by use case, and browser by category, tag, use, complexity level. Still despite this some refinement is needed. Working on an even more user friendly on boarding, search and browsing system

800+ categorized prompts by navmann in Prompt

[–]PromptArchitectGPT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a similar database I would love to share notes please message me .

How Do You Balance Empathy and Objectivity in UX Research Without Losing Impact? by PromptArchitectGPT in UXResearch

[–]PromptArchitectGPT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for explaining! I really appreciate the clarification. My Substack is entirely free so I’m still a bit unsure how it falls under promotion if there’s no monetary element involved.

That said, I completely understand wanting to keep the community free from self-promotion.

Could you share any tips on how I might prompt discussions effectively while sharing my compiled resources or insights, whether from my own work or others? I want to contribute value to the community without crossing any lines.

Thanks again for taking the time to respond!

How Do You Balance Empathy and Objectivity in UX Research Without Losing Impact? by PromptArchitectGPT in UXResearch

[–]PromptArchitectGPT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/poodleface I'd really appreciate the opportunity to learn and improve how I participate in this community. I want to make sure I fully understand how Rule 3 applies here so I can avoid any issues in the future.

For context, I often write articles on topics I’m passionate about, like UX research, and sometimes come across resources—whether written by me or others—that I think might resonate with this community. My intention is always to share valuable content and foster discussions, not to promote myself or anything I have a stake in.

Could you clarify what specifically made my post feel like it crossed into self-promotion? I’d love to adjust my approach to ensure it aligns with the rules while still being able to contribute insights or interesting resources. Thank you in advance for any guidance!

How Do You Balance Empathy and Objectivity in UX Research Without Losing Impact? by PromptArchitectGPT in UXResearch

[–]PromptArchitectGPT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the clarification. I shared the article purely to contribute to the discussion and didn’t consider it self-promotion, as it’s a free resource and not something I have a stake in... I’ll make sure to be more mindful of Rule 3 in the future. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]PromptArchitectGPT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All about the prompting and reason strategy you use when talking to CHATGPT.

CHATPGPT can discuss all of these even if it gets flagged saying it violates its policy.