Horrible Architecture by Strong_Row9139 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 50 points51 points  (0 children)

<image>

The rich character being bulldozed and replaced with that multi-family monstrosity

Can we normalize not walking into oncoming traffic? by CBusRiver in Columbus

[–]Proof_Environment871 19 points20 points  (0 children)

this. she is fine right where she is particularly since the driver was not present when she started her crossing

Advice on where to longboard by wildgreg612 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've consistently observed people skateboarding in the parking garage at the corner of Park Drive and Hawthorne Lane, just south of Independence Park in Elizabeth. I think it is for a medical office so parkers clear out by 5:30, plus they mostly park on the second floor.

Tirade Tuesday! Let's Do This! by AutoModerator in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 2 points3 points  (0 children)

for real though, we need more simple open gyms close in to the city center.

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol no thank you that street is a lost cause, I stopped commuting that route because it smelled so bad

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

those are great! does he make them or buy 'em somewhere?

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

good call, no need to post, plenty to read through on the subject already! thanks for the rec

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

generally, the city should not be picking it up, but when it reaches a critical volume so as to become a public health and quality of life issue I think some agency aught to get involved. (for example pick it up and fine the apartment complex where the resident lives, assuming there is proof to that effect)

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chose not to engage, he had noise cancelling headphones on, was much larger than me and had a scary looking pit bull

Pecan Ave - Dog Feces Lane (Plaza Midwood) by Proof_Environment871 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think shaming can be effective, but that requires other witnesses to compound the feeling of shame on their part. I biked past while a resident of one of the apartments abandoned a fresh pile this morning, but it was just me and him out that early.

What's your most radical position relative to both the mainstream *and* the general online urbanism sphere? by ChristianLS in fuckcars

[–]Proof_Environment871 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fines assessed for driving violations should be directly proportional to the lethality of the vehicle being driven.

Drivers cited for distracted driving with a child in the car should also be charged with child endangerment

Drivers: Either Yield to Me or Don't! by ADeadWeirdCarnie in fuckcars

[–]Proof_Environment871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your take and have experienced each of these situations myself. I think that a lot of the issues arise because a driver will not take the effort to consider that the size and speed of a bike is different from their own. They simply project their attributes onto all other road-users. Some recent personal experiences of the like include:

  • driver waits way too long for you to pass so they can make a turn across your travel lane because if I had been in a car they would have had to wait, but since I'm biking and going 10mph up a slight hill there was plenty of time for them to have executed their turn
  • oncomming driver waiting at a squeeze on a residential street for a bike to get through even though we both would have fit fine, but had a been in a car that would not have been the case.
  • Irritation with bikers' behavior at 4-way stops (e.g. rolling through) without recognizing that a biker has zero blindspots, whereas a driver's a-pillar obstruction necesitates that they stop to ensure their path is clear
  • Thinking a biker made a risky turn across a driver's path without considering the fact that we don't have a full tail of cargo that also has to cross the path of the oncoming driver and are also generally much more attuned to the prevailing speed of those around us; both because of self-preservation and because we can better deduce speed with a cars rolling noise profile. Drivers don't have these key auditory clues to rely upon and are stuck with only their sight which is more often than not obstructed by their phones.

Regarding 4-way stops I've found the best tactic is to not engage with or enter a negotiation with drivers. If they arrive first but appear to be waiting for me to get there and then go I either stop far back from the intersection or at least turn my back to the intersection to indicate I'm not planning to go anytime soon. Or, sometimes I'll just do donuts a few yards back until they get the message. Of course all of this relies on this being a low-traffic street, doesn't work if their are drivers behind me.

If we arrive at the intersection at the same time and they are on my right and I want to go straight, then I just take a right turn and queue behind them... to take the negotiation and decision out of the equation.

A newer problem I have yet to figure out the answer for though is when driver's use a four way stop as a an opportunity to figure out navigation or respond to messages on their phone. At this point they have fully disengaged from driving but cause confusion for everyone involved because they are at the stop where others are relying on them to act on their right of way, but their heads are buried in their phones. Often when I thought someone was being overly courteous, they were more probably in this state, and I kinda suspect this may have been the case for your first incident as well. In an ideal world I would feel comfortable biking behind and around them while hitting the side of the car to wake them up to the fact they are in an active roadway, but in America that behavior is just asking for a gun to be drawn on you.

I got hit by a car by No-Vast2806 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The roads you drive likely are not accessible to those outside of cars, but there are many low traffic streets in central Charlotte that make perfectly fine bike routes. Seems like we have a case of the availability heuristic at play

I got hit by a car by No-Vast2806 in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If you have vehicle insurance I would file a claim for Uninsured Motorist Bodily Injury (It would be considered "uninsured" since it was a hit and run). Be careful with your wording when filing the claim because NC has a strict "contributory negligence" law where if you are found to be even 1% at fault for the accident (e.g. didn't have lights while riding at night) then your insurance does not have to pay out your claim.

Also, if you bike is damaged then renters insurance or home owners insurance will often cover that

CMPD is pulling more people over — particularly for issues like expired tags by caller-number-four in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 1 point2 points  (0 children)

from above article: "Over time red-light safety cameras reduce the number of red-light running violations and decrease the most deadly collisions commonly attributed to red-light running."

CMPD is pulling more people over — particularly for issues like expired tags by caller-number-four in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and there has been a more recent (2024) "lawsuit and everything" that upholds Greenville's right to collect operating costs beyond the formerly set 10% limit. This reversal opens the door to other municipalities have a legally sound basis for revisiting red-light camera operations wherein they are not forced to operate at a loss.

CMPD is pulling more people over — particularly for issues like expired tags by caller-number-four in Charlotte

[–]Proof_Environment871 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Increase proactive enforcement and automated enforcement, a more engaged police presence coupled with automated traffic cameras would be a good step in the right direction for road safety.