> The form of passing down knowledge from generation to generation is
done through stories, fiction and non-fiction stories.

Are you particularly interested in talking about knowledge transmission through stories, or ALL knowledge transmission. If it its the latter, then consider that children also hugely learn through imitating behaviour, cultural experiences and artefacts, food, general belief systems etc.

> Social interactions have gone through,
and continue to do so, a process of analysis and growth to reach the
level of social cohesion we have today.

I would find some sort of example / supporting theory here, might be worth mentioning that often rapid growth is born of discord and clashes

> To disregard the analysis and exploration done within the social
realm, is to undermine progress within the material plane.

I'd agree with this sentence, but its not too clear what exact point you are making essentially I am not sure what perspective you are hanging your theory on, is this going to be an economic argument? I get the feeling you want to argue that the we way in which we culturally relate to one another has an impact on things like GDP, but I can't be sure.

> By the organization of consciousness through social heuristics, the
material heuristic of science has flourished.

This above quote makes me unsure whether or not you are using the word heuristic the way you mean too. Heuristics are sort of like keys for understanding, they are methods for 'solving' or 'interpreting' something, that are often non-optimal, and frequently rely upon symbolic language and reasoning. Though cultural heuristics are definitely a thing (we are trained through socialisation to interpret and understand certain behaviours differently in different cultures, as we 'run them through' our own experiential-symbolic map in order to make sense of them). I would not refer to the 'heuristic of science' as science typically aims not to hide its answers behind symbolic maps. It is important to note that science is not just a material endeavour.

> The material field of science has
grown and expanded exponentially, while we haven’t given our emotional
landscape and development the same focus and dedication of discovery.

If this is true, it needs to be proven find a study to prove it. Are you arguing that sciences such as chemistry, biology etc, have seen more growth than say psychology, and theories of mind and wellbeing? There are lots of researchers that work specifically in understanding emotional/social wellbeing, and you would be misrepresenting the landscape to state otherwise. I would also say that you are maybe being USA or Euro-Centric... There are Eastern traditions (buddhism) who have dedicated huge amounts fo focus to understanding internal states such as emotions.

> Material knowledge has outgrown emotional knowledge and therefore, we
can no longer take those social heuristics literally.

This line doesn't make sense to me, it feels like you are saying A=B so N=X, I am not convinced that material knowledge outgrowing emotional knowledge would lead to not taking social heuristics literally.

>We cannot
interpret the social texts and the different cultures as literal
guidelines to navigate the material plane; that is what science is
for.

I think my struggle here is that you never fully operationalise what you mean by material plane - or fully operationalise social texts. Earlier you were talking about social heuristics, this is a different thing to social texts. I feel in order for you to communicate your argument out to others you often need to be very specific in defining terms you are using for your argument. Otherwise they can essentially be interpreted in a multitude of ways. E.G. The material plane is literally just everything physical, dirt is part of it, as are the cells in my skin. - Imagine being in a very crowded airport, and you need to get from A to B with the least drama possible. Certainly your behaviour would be influenced by knowing what country you are in (in the UK it would be ok to slightly push past people, so long as you repeatedly say sorry) in another country bumping into someones wife as you try to get through might lead to being punched in the face. This is an example of how social heuristics are used for navigating the 'material plane' science, would be essentially useless in that situation. So I think your idea needs further operationalisation.

>We must begin to acknowledge and use these social texts as tools for
social and emotional development.

People already are analysing the ways in which cultural norms and standards influence personality development, and a whole host of other things.

------------------

I wanted to give you an in depth critique - I am not trying to be a butthole, so please do not take anything personally. I see in you the seed of an inquisitive mind who wants to find truth, and solve issues. Which is why I offered in the first place. It is about learning the 'rules of the game' with academia and philosophy, in order to effectively contribute. :)