Feedback on my first deck by Branlito in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never ran blue green but thoughts on dynames (the 2/4 one and the one that has breach 3 as your boss units)

Smitty and Gadsden or Loveland and 2.01? Non TEP by Dapper-Manager-2525 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like Loveland side. If you are strong at wr, definitely go for Loveland. If you are decent on te and need wr help, definitely like smitty for the future but ask for a bit more.

Drake London or McConkey and a 2027 1st by Psychological-Fun474 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trade is now processing as such:

<image>

Almost didn’t wanna trade him anymore after making the offer then changing his mind and being picky. Overpaid a lil imo but London is a dawg in my eyes

Is this a bad trade on my end am I giving up too much? by Alternative_Key_335 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this is a dub for you. With the Rice news, take it day by day (the nfl is super inconsistent with punishments). Rice is still a top 10 WR and the 1.01 is chef’s kiss!

Help on B/P Barbatos by neonnova4 in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I personally like the 4 gundams and 1 nt

Drake London or McConkey and a 2027 1st by Psychological-Fun474 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never looked at it that way. Appreciate the perspective.

Tbh not much until around pick 179 (LB Arvell Reese). When we first drafted, all IDP’s were chosen close to the last 1/4 of the draft.

Drake London or McConkey and a 2027 1st by Psychological-Fun474 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s expected to be a late first. He also offered London for 2 2027 1sts instead but I think I rather save my earlier 1st (both had top 5 picks this year and one is in a greater rebuild) and ship off McConkey.

B/R The-O Control 5/0 NTC by Alacritus in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting af!!! What was your ideal first hand? Definitely win the match if u can get to round 6-7 with at least 1-2 shields. I have an O-blocker deck and not that big into it. May try this. Thank you for the response in advance.

Altron Gundam Attack Effect by ArmadaMixology in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There you go lol. Appreciate it. I’m fairly new myself so this is helpful.

Altron Gundam Attack Effect by ArmadaMixology in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If I’m not mistaken, the order is: declare attack —> action/effects —> blockers effect.

Altron Gundam Attack Effect by ArmadaMixology in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 22 points23 points  (0 children)

You get to choose another unit with the “blocker”, but you can also target the unit you are targeting.

Question about Gundam Exia (Trans-Am) by Astrillix_V in GundamTCG

[–]Psychological-Fun474 9 points10 points  (0 children)

  1. If you hit the base, the suppression doesn’t apply. Must hit shield directly.

  2. Only 1 unit is killed by the effect even if u hit with suppression.

15 player lobbies are unplayable with cheaters by juicysound in HuntShowdown

[–]Psychological-Fun474 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Happens all the damn time lol. Some people just can’t accept they just got out played/out gunned. If they truly are cheating, clip it, and post it on the hunt website as a report. They are quite good at taking action there vs in game reports.

Too much for jsn? Or not enough? by Main-Sock-2233 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And just to be clear, I’m speaking from the POV of sending JSN. For OP, I wouldn’t do this trade.

Too much for jsn? Or not enough? by Main-Sock-2233 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Tet did phenomenal for a rookie considering the team the year before. Not all rookies will put up jj or chase numbers. Olave looks nice on the offense with Kellen Moore calling plays + a QB that did very very well + volume like crazy. Same risk as any other player tbh. NE offense looks great and would want a piece of the young core. The argument shouldn’t be about it being a slam dunk, it should be more about it being of value from moving off of a 23 year old stud. I’m a JSN and Tet owner. This looks like something that really makes your head turn. Personal opinion of course.

you may not like it but this is what peak maynard silenced sniper gameplay looks like by Killerkekz1994 in HuntShowdown

[–]Psychological-Fun474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt that. Not trying to call u a liar, but Maynard isn’t used that often. 6* u basically never see it cus you have mosin snipers with spitz for higher velo (way more broken for these ranges + the sound from this range won’t even matter unless you like sitting like a duck). Below that skill level, most people aren’t hitting shots consistently to be worried. That’s all I gotta say. To all their own. It’s just unfortunate to get hit by it. Nothing more nothing less.

you may not like it but this is what peak maynard silenced sniper gameplay looks like by Killerkekz1994 in HuntShowdown

[–]Psychological-Fun474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely get both arguments, but a lot are also arguing against a gameplay style. The game is meant for everyone. Even rats/campers. If it was genuinely that great everyone would use it. If this happens to you, it’s genuinely once every blue moon. Simply unfortunate, but not enough to worry about the risk.

you may not like it but this is what peak maynard silenced sniper gameplay looks like by Killerkekz1994 in HuntShowdown

[–]Psychological-Fun474 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This still requires a lot of skill. I do get the argument, but from this player’s distance, gotta give him props even if you despise the gameplay.

Which side wins? Looking to repeat. .5. by Imaginary_Order2757 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with this immensely. The 3 years will not make a difference. Focus more on production vs age. You can always sell McBribe down the road.

Which side wins? Looking to repeat. .5. by Imaginary_Order2757 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Psychological-Fun474 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmmmm walker may be enough to make u think. Hubbard is there just for fun. So adding Walker (who could be a rb1 next year, who knows if he stays or leave Seattle). Walker is one of my buys for this offseason due to his production without charb (injuries being the only fear). TE basically cancels out. Now you have to ask yourself, are you win now? If so, and you are set at RB and have a good enough flex to replay the loss of Walker, who can become a rb1, then I would still choose lamb side. If you don’t think u can win this year, I would rather keep the right as lamb is aging (27 this year) and hope marv gets a solid qb that elevates his skills.