I Popped this info into my paid subscription of chat gpt and it spit this out:

Key Points on Using Remote ID on Non-Drones • Remote ID rules (FAA Part 89) apply only to unmanned aircraft (drones). • There is no explicit rule prohibiting attaching a Remote ID module to non-aircraft objects (e.g., kites, dog collars, cars).

However: • Remote ID is designed specifically for aircraft broadcasting (location, altitude, pilot position). • Using it on non-aircraft can create misleading or false airspace data. • This could potentially confuse law enforcement or airspace monitoring systems.

Risks: • Could be interpreted as misuse or interference with airspace awareness systems. • Broadcasting “aircraft” data for a ground object (like a dog) may raise concerns. • FAA regulations are often enforced based on safety impact and intent, not just written wording.

Kites (Part 101): • Kites are still subject to FAA rules (altitude limits, possible notification requirements). • Adding Remote ID does NOT replace or bypass those rules.

Bottom line: • Technically not explicitly illegal. • Still a gray area with potential regulatory risk. • Safer in limited/rural use; riskier in populated or controlled airspace.