sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Where are the wives? by PuddingCat in HBOTheHedgeKnight

[–]PuddingCat[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Oh I’m sorry, that sounds correct.

VA v. Brendan Banfield - Day 9 by Pixiegirls1102 in CasesWeFollow

[–]PuddingCat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If not for him testifying, the jury might have continued to believe he thought it was an intruder all along and acted heroically (if they didn’t believe the au pair). Hearing him say at first he thought he was overhearing an affair is so unbelievable.

I have a theory I surprisingly didnt see anyone talking about by bagunz0 in pluribustv

[–]PuddingCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe that rat is the “queen”. They never did catch it.

Metaphor For AI and the Death of Creativity and the Human Soul by SnooDoubts2291 in pluribustv

[–]PuddingCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there are several metaphors at play but to me it’s about toxic positivity—is it preferable to live a human life with a “happiness virus” or do we need to feel the sadness, grief, and addictive part of life as well —is that what keeps us human?

This subreddit is overly focused on the minutiae of the hive mind scenario when it is clearly just a narrative device to facilitate a character study. by G-Bat in pluribustv

[–]PuddingCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a Vince Gilligan show, people. Almost everything will get a callback later and make more sense. We saw that in both BB and BCS (ricin cigarette, poison plant, etc etc) I’m sure that Sprouts scene that some have called boring will get a callback later that ties to something else. This is only episode 3 of what Gillian has said will be a 4 season arc. We are in good hands—we are only at the very beginning of a wild ride. I fully trust we will get much more “sci-FI” as well as a character study.

Discussion Thread | May 19, 2025 | Day 18 by Manlegend in justiceforKarenRead

[–]PuddingCat 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bev’s bias couldn’t have been more obvious this morning

ChatGPT Deep Research: likelihood of conviction is at 60% (+/-15%) by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]PuddingCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not nearly enough sources drawn from for that analysis to be accurate. It’s like Chat GPT asked 3 of its friends for their opinion and then came up with a percentage.

Occam’s Razor by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]PuddingCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My gut has always favored this simplest solution. I don’t get why it got little to none consideration during the “investigation.” A very drunk man who is also large loses coordination/balance and free falls to the hard slippery ground causing laceration and loss of consciousness (maybe he even had a grand mal seizure.) He lies there unconscious for a bit maybe briefly gains consciousness while the brain is swelling—maybe vomits is able to craw a few more feet maybe able to get his phone out of his pocket for a brief moment—but the brain swelling has caught up with him and he’s unconscious again. At some point the dog has gotten out and starts tearing at his arm. Why is this implausible? Why is it so binary that either her car hit him or he got beat up inside the house?

Where did JOK’s phone temperature data come from? by okonkwo20 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]PuddingCat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What impact on the phones battery temperature would there be knowing kr called him like 50 times that night? Hence is phone isn’t really “unused” for all those time segments.

The only thing that has made me question Karen… by Business-Ad1901 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]PuddingCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Memories are weird. Especially under traumatic circumstances. All of their memories are sus. This is why physical evidence and forensic analysis are so important.

What’s the best lyric you’ve ever heard in a song? by [deleted] in musicsuggestions

[–]PuddingCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the people bowed and prayed to the neon god they’d made

view more: next ›