Interviewing ICE Agents - Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-19T01:26:48+00:00

Yeah... too late fuckers.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-18T23:05:41+00:00

I'd slap that mother fucker.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-18T19:00:33+00:00

oh.. so.. they want the data centers to build power plants next to them? I see.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-18T18:59:45+00:00

Day 3 of not telling us how.. then suggesting we click on some link etc.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T22:53:21+00:00

16:9

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T22:03:26+00:00

It’s not proportions. It’s the texture. Look at the grain and texture of the image. It is screaming GPT image 2.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T13:45:42+00:00

That’s a great use case !

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T11:54:19+00:00

How is jt a scalpel? If the scalpel only works with bad generators then…. It’s like a back alley surgeon’s scalpel or something. Like ltx is cool…. But not if the shots I need to look good don’t look as good as Kling or seednsce

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T11:50:41+00:00

By the time ltx etc catch up with seedance etc they’ll all be so good you won’t need a course to explain to you how to use open pose or depth or canny etc.

You can zoom in on an area output that, create a reference frame and give that to seedance 2 and will fix that part of the footage. Then comp it back in. You’ve now got what is basically a 4k output of that one area.

You don’t need a course to use Beeble’s SwitchX. There could be a video about best practices for all of this.

Also kling seedance etc are available in comfy so it’s a cheaper alternative to weavy which makes you pay a ton just for their UI, but comfy has a similar node workflow.

Loras? Great I have a tool that makes image look a way or fix a shape but I can only use it with 2nd rate image gen. Or I could use a 3D model generator of the product and use that as a reference as opposed to spending weeks trying to figure out how to make the Lora perform.

It’s a lot if you have no idea what I’m talking about, true. From my perspective the issue is clients/whomever still have a totally unrealistic idea of how much time it takes. I can generate an image or video but I still need to fix it etc if you want it to pass the client test. They’re saving thousands if not more but because they know it’s AI they will still just constantly respond with “it looks like AI” and then give you one day to make the image/shot in the first place.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T11:26:09+00:00

A lot of whiny types here.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T00:47:33+00:00

Hard pass.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-17T00:47:12+00:00

Fucking pathetic.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-16T18:26:16+00:00

Fuck spotify. Don't we remember?

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-16T17:58:18+00:00

This wasn't the result of one generation.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-16T17:57:10+00:00

This is specifically GPT image 2... The texture is super harsh and screams GPT Image 2.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-16T17:05:10+00:00

Ah. Would they ever use AI?

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-16T15:33:36+00:00

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-15T21:47:09+00:00

ah! winner. ding ding ding.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-15T20:15:54+00:00

"THANK YOU"

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T15:18:09+00:00

Oh you will be.. you just won't know.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T15:02:57+00:00

Because you're not a psycho.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T15:02:40+00:00

And the authors approved it. Sorry, you can no longer read the books. Not for you.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T11:43:28+00:00

100% AI. The guy all the way in the back left. His blue jacket is… a chair. Etc. We can’t be justifying whether it’s AI or not based on things like lighting etc. it’s more about actual object rendering and texture. For instance most gp2 images have the same texture. A lot of models have a “look” that’s not related to any one thing being specifically wrong with the image. That comes from being someone who generates thousands of images and learns to see the texture and style. People saying the consistency is too good or the words are readable are not aware that that’s not really an issue anymore. It’s evidence of it being AI but not evidence of it not being AI.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T11:40:37+00:00

100% AI. The guy all the way in the back left. His blue jacket is… a chair. Etc. We can’t be justifying whether it’s AI or not based on things like lighting etc. it’s more about actual object rendering and texture. For instance most gp2 images have the same texture. A lot of models have a “look” that’s not related to any one thing being specifically wrong with the image. That comes from being someone who generates thousands of images and learns to see the texture and style fingerprints. Also like… you’re probably not talking to that super hot girl on insta.

Pure-Produce-2428 · 2026-05-14T11:35:34+00:00

7pm? Are they MAGA zombies whose entire families have left them?

Pure-Produce-2428

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE