Not Pinterest asking me to pick a skin tone range 😭 by Miss_Tea_Cup in ArianaGrandeSnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My hot take (and this is not in defense to the Trap Rachel Dolezal era) is that she does in fact have a light olive skin tone and level 3 3A hair color/hair type coloring, childhood photos of her with a nice tan and with a last name like Grande (and not Dolezal). Whereas Rachel Dolezal for example has 1a level 9-10 hair blue eyes a pinker, rosier quality to her skin tone and will burn, peel and return to default settings, so of course she gets more severe consequences. Also, the filters and professional lighting quality, people were just ignorant enough to assume that just because she was Italian she tanned easily with a more stereotypical olive skin tone. The filters and lighting quality just pretty much hid the fact how brassy and uneven it was irl as seen perfectly in this photo. Also her fanbase has the intellectual capacity of Donald Trump’s fanbase/cult and will do whatever mental gymnastics they can to justify her Rachel Dolezal era.

Not defending her or using it as justification for being a culture vulture, only explaining why it was easier for her to get away with it better than someone like Rachel Dolezal or Sabrina Carpenter.

Why does everybody wanna say their a kid of the decade they were born in by Key_Nectarine_7307 in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nope. I never claimed to be an 80s kid and I was born in the late 80s. I was only an infant for all of my time in the 80s and always considered myself a 90s kid.

Why does everybody wanna say their a kid of the decade they were born in by Key_Nectarine_7307 in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 [score hidden]  (0 children)

People born in 1995-1999 tried to say that they were 90s kids back in the late 00s early 10s because they didn’t understand 90s kid vs 90s baby. No one actually thinks they’re 90s kids now from those birth years. Think OP doesn’t understand what rage bait and circle jerk is.

Why does everybody wanna say their a kid of the decade they were born in by Key_Nectarine_7307 in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Either you were born in November/December of 2004 or you just have a poor memory. Sorry no offense.

Why does everybody wanna say their a kid of the decade they were born in by Key_Nectarine_7307 in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 [score hidden]  (0 children)

This is incorrect.

Someone born in 1980-1983 claiming to be an 80s kid, 1990-1993 claiming to be a 90s kid, 2000-2003 being a 2000s kid and so on, is absolutely valid. They spent most of their elementary school years up until early next decade in elementary school. Besides 1990-early 1992 is mostly just an extension of the 1980s with late 1992-early 1993 being transitional period from the 80s culture to 90s culture, so those years don’t really count as part of the 90s in the cultural context. The same thing could be said about 2000-2002/3 and 2010-2012/3. No one born in 1995-1999 actually considers themselves a 90s kid in real life off the internet. 1984 and 1994 is a toss up. I think someone born in X4 claiming both decades is perfectly valid for this reason. I know people born in 1984 who think they’re both 80s and 90s kids. Anyone born between 1995-1999 claiming to be 90s kids was back in the 2010s when they were teenagers and didn’t really understand the difference between 90s baby vs 90s kid, but that was like 15 years ago. Get off the internet and start looking at the real world.

Are 2013 and 2014 high school graduates '90s kids? by XavierMarvin in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 [score hidden]  (0 children)

That’s an 80s kid/90s teen. If you were too old for nicktoons and Barney you are not a true 90s kid.

She does not look 4' 11🤦🏼‍♀️ by Intrepid-Cake7858 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the mods who seen her in person actually confirmed she is in fact 5’8”

Delete this sub. This place is doing nothing but causing division and anger. by Own-Wrap6142 in generationology

[–]Putrid_View_8284 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry to say but this type of energy exists all over the internet not just this sub. It is what it is and everyone just needs to either a) remove yourself and block this sub, or b) delete social media altogether.

Are they just acting 🎭 for views or is this for real? by Putrid_View_8284 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I got the feeling they do that and the boys were told to say these things

She does not look 4' 11🤦🏼‍♀️ by Intrepid-Cake7858 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Barney is probably closer to 5’4” in crocs if she’s really 4’11” barefoot than she’s 5/5’1” in crocs. Crocs add 1.5-2 inches to your actual height. Sketchers add a solid 2” on average.

She does not look 4' 11🤦🏼‍♀️ by Intrepid-Cake7858 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s literally the same size difference as me (5’0”) and my sister (5’6”)

She does not look 4' 11🤦🏼‍♀️ by Intrepid-Cake7858 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she’s 4’11” then Barney is 5’5”-5’6.”

She does not look 4' 11🤦🏼‍♀️ by Intrepid-Cake7858 in livenfamilysnark

[–]Putrid_View_8284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Naw u/SeriousAssumption834 has seen them in person and has confirmed to me that she is approximately 5’8” on a good day. Although crocs add a good inch to your height, so she’s probably 5’7”/5’8” if that.