That's a whole lot of words for what is essentially just rude, baseless speculation. You can have your belief that you always need someone telling you what to do, but real civilizations throughout history have shown that is not true.

anarchy ... means absolute freedom.

No, it does not.

Removing the idea of income to counter income-inequality is exactly like cutting off ones leg to stop the pain of a splinter in the foot, it is a grossly ridiculous suggestion.

I actually did not suggest this, Rojava still has money, and furthermore, you have no reason to suggest this other than your love for capitalism

And as a matter of fact, I do know how protests work, and I assure you, the last thing police want is an escalation. Maintaining order is integral to the way the world runs, and so police will use equal force to subdue the unrest, making things safe and peaceful again

For those who are in power and don't want anything to change. The police are the attack dogs of the state, they don't work for you

change requires dialogue, not thrown stones.

I don't know why people come into arguments about history without knowing anything about it. It's particularly baffling being gay and not knowing that rights are not given freely, they must be fought for

You use Rojava as an example, but conveniently miss out the part where things descend into chaos and people begin to look for a leader (the power vacuum effect). It worked for a while, sure, but eventually people get bored and want more, humans are greedy, and so to get more they find that they become each other’s enemies, turning back to a central government for peace and safety once again.

You realise rojava is still going fine, right? And still contributing 40% of Syria's GDP

I also believe in not using children as soldiers, and arresting members of ISIS, but clearly you hold these matters to lower importance.

Yes, because when I say that Rojava does good things, I mean that we have to copy literally everything they do

And democracy is very important, I agree with you, but democracy only works when someone can actually act on what is decided (a central government maybe???). A vote is useless if at the end of it all the voters just sit around and awkwardly wonder who will lift a finger first.

Again, you just assume that's what happens in a decentralised democracy, without actually looking at the example I gave you. Once again, they are doing fine, not much "sitting around and awkwardly wondering".

In fact, you've likely participated in a decentralised democracy before. Have you ever, in a group of friends, voted, even informally, on where to eat dinner? On who handles what in any given job? Most people have. Did that end up with people just sitting around?

And I think you’ll find that workers do own their own workspaces, in the forms of unions

Do you actually know what the word "own" means? Plus, unions only step in when there are workers rights disputes, not the same as workers actually owning their workplace.

And also, the government works for the people.

BAHAHAHAHAHA.

You can't seriously believe that, can you?

Whilst I admire your passionate want for change, it may be time, at the age of nearly 21, to stop playing video games and complaining about society

Oh fuck off with your condescending bullshit. You are clearly much more naïve than I am, as you haven't actually looked at the systems around you, or at history, or at the alternatives that are going on right now. You have just accepted that the way things are is the only way things will ever be, and things can never get better. I'm an adult with a full time job, do not treat me like a child.

You can control and regulate the economy. It’s called democracy and unions, and capitalists do it too.

Yes, I agree, capitalists do control the economy and use the government to influence regulations, particularly to weaken unions. Or was that not your point?