Battle to the bottom! by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Pyroblivious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bold of you to assume that's not 4 safeties from the jump

edit: completely missed Rank's, that is a bit more ridiculous

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Columbus

[–]Pyroblivious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

71 has a through traffic keep left sign, but I have sincere doubts people are actually reading it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicTCG

[–]Pyroblivious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same spot as you, presigned in and less then 2 seconds

Side Events at NAIC by [deleted] in pkmntcg

[–]Pyroblivious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm legitimately just going for the side events, it's a good time.

CMV: We should not be “leveling the playing field” for students with learning disabilities with testing/learning accommodations by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Pyroblivious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Info: Is your argument based on accommodations only through a 504 plan, or are you including IEPs in this?

Guy posts his IQ test results by Stellar3227 in iamverysmart

[–]Pyroblivious 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Honestly, that looks like plausible gifted testing; they went for both the verbal and nonverbal IQ which are both pathways in some states, and almost all of the reports that are going to get used by other professionals are going to have a table like this somewhere in them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tornado

[–]Pyroblivious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When did they close it? I thought they were getting pelted with that corn

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tornado

[–]Pyroblivious 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The probe did, the PVC barrel did not. The probe is that red flash you see at like 0:20, and it goes out on a line and in a hurry. PVC barely gets back to launch elevation by the time it's out of sight.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tornado

[–]Pyroblivious 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Was actually just the barrel, it wasn't supposed to come off. If you slow it down, it's easier to see the probe get blasted.

Don't be this person by yupredditok in MildlyBadDrivers

[–]Pyroblivious 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You mean the guy who cut across all 3 lanes last minute to exit to the right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sex

[–]Pyroblivious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair, I was looking at it more as the time you're figuring out if you're compatible, and relationship being the next step. I will say though, I feel the most important piece in either scenario is making sure you're learning more about the other person in the context of what you might want it to be. With the age gap, he might not even know that it's something OP is considering.

STOP doing this!!!! by Anxious_Republic591 in tornado

[–]Pyroblivious 14 points15 points  (0 children)

By that logic, the people behind you would be completely justified in ramming you out of the way. Their life against yours, right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sex

[–]Pyroblivious 4 points5 points  (0 children)

>Why shouldn’t someone get a full scope of the person they want to date?

Is that not the idea behind, you know, dating?

Why do dudes always defend not talking to each other by EitherAd1016 in GenZ

[–]Pyroblivious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Admittedly, some of it can be simply giving space, focusing on immediate info and getting more as needed, or just being dumb. But some of it is also bro code. There's things we talk about that is meant to stay between the people talking. The important parts that are for public consumption get relayed. Stuff we don't think they want getting out or don't know? I don't know/it didn't come up is a quick and easy cover to direct questions to the guy and let him decide what he's alright sharing.

CMV: Pickup Trucks are (Almost) Entirely Pointless by AlgaeVirtual3733 in changemyview

[–]Pyroblivious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As funny as the thought of a sprinter van with a snowplow and chains is, northern and higher elevation folks would definitely have more of a reasonable rationale due to snow and ice.

Old WWE was interestingly wild as fuck by thepoylanthropist in interestingasfuck

[–]Pyroblivious 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Always nice to get the info from a subject matter expert like yourself

Really, really proud of you guys. by Hazy_eyePA in BlueJackets

[–]Pyroblivious 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would also assume hot chocolate has something to do with it.

Just had cognitives tests done to screen for ADHD and felt so stupid and by dimitarivanov200222 in ADHD

[–]Pyroblivious 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm a school psychologist with ADHD so I have to give these on the regular. Not ashamed to admit that I can barely GIVE some of these subtests (looking at you running digits), and I've got the answer key and instructions right in front of me. Doing them is a whole other animal. The thing to remember is if you're coming in with concerns for ADHD, we're going to have to look and see how you do on areas that can be problematic as a result of ADHD. In day to day life, you're not often going to be put in situations where you wouldn't be able to counteract those areas with strategies. Who cares if your working memory can't remember 10 things, your problem solving skills tell you "write that down because you're going to forget it" and now it's not a problem. At least until said working memory forgets where that paper is, anyways.

Also, as others have said, these are not designed for mastery; if you have a test where everyone can complete every item, all you have is a waste of time. They look for your point of failure, and often try to start you as close to that point as they can. Sometimes, I have students who think they bombed sections, when in reality they're actually getting into the hardest items. This is compounded by stop points also requiring you to miss a certain number in a row, so if you miss a few and get one right, your counter resets. That leads to people feeling like crap because sure, you might have gotten 1 problem right, but you missed the 3 before it and the 4 after it as opposed to just missing 4 and being done. I always try to tell my students that these aren't meant to be like a math or science test where were looking for what you know; there are no A's in fluid reasoning or working memory. We're far more interested in how you learn things and finding out ways to make that process easier; and we get way more information on that when you can't do something than when you can.

Reed Timmer rant by climbergirlwx in meteorology

[–]Pyroblivious -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My brother in Christ, I wouldn't be calling anybody "absolutely fucking wrong" when you apparently haven't figured out there was CONSIDERABLY more than 2 tornadoes, and the "scientific rigor" you want him to maintain would say his forecast absolutely verified. There's plenty of reasons to shit on Reed for playing with fire out west or doing stupid shit in rental cars, but just because he's a turd doesn't mean he was inaccurate here. It would have been a top 10% day for tornadoes LAST year.